This small example, however, is an indication of how people in the subcontinent have — surprisingly — thought for centuries. Reading Mughal history, I was rather surprised that even at the height of his power, when the Mughal world was miles ahead in terms of wealth and development than most of the world, Shah Jahan still dreamt of transforming Delhi into Isfahan. Granted that the mesmerising power of the Persian culture and tradition had its lure, but Shah Jahan’s lack of confidence in something purely ‘Indian’ was clear. Similarly, with the advent of the British, we began to worship everything British, so much so that even when India began to produce its own cloth, most people still preferred cloth made of Indian cotton in Manchester over their local product.
More recently, the way in which Pakistanis have taken on American styles and culture since the 1960s has been more than obvious. I always marvel at the fact that after only a few months in the US, Pakistanis begin to speak with an American accent, whereas they cannot even learn simple grammar at home. The same is true for the recent enchanting effect of Turkish soap operas. Despite the fact that Pakistan has the capacity to produce excellent soap operas, we still want to import Turkish soaps — with the extra effort of translating them and paying a hundred thousand rupees in tax for each episode, and not focusing on producing high quality Pakistani dramas. Similarly, the recent fascination of Punjab with everything Turkish gives the impression that the Turks have got it right and we simply need to copy them to succeed — only if life were that easy!
While emulating something good is not a bad idea, doing it at the cost of one’s own self is detrimental. Continuously trying to adopt the ways of an alien culture will not only make one think less of one’s own, but also lead to a loss of identity and self-confidence. How can we stand up and compete with the rest of the world if we are unsure about what and who we are? We are first Anglophiles, then Americanised, later Arabised, and now Turko-fied — when will we become Pakistanised, I wonder? (and that, too, without pre-defining what Pakistanisation means!).
More importantly, this fascination with something foreign leads us into a kind of a ‘dreamland’, which often leads to delusions. Since we do not know how these foreign cultures achieved what we envy, we simply think that they can be easily obtained. Therefore, we want all the benefits of democracy enjoyed by the US and Europe, but do not want to endure the harsh times they went through to achieve this. We want the standard of living of Britain but do not want to suffer the hardships of the industrial revolution. We want everything sorted and that too in 90 days. Indeed, we have become a ‘90-day or bust’ nation.
This dreamland situation is something that is, I argue, leading to our ambivalent attitude towards violent non-state actors and the real reason for the stagnation of the country. We are sick and tired of the rampant corruption, ruinous economy and decrepit government and want it all fixed, but do not want to take the tough steps to fix it. Therefore, a number of us actually like the ‘milk and honey’ dreamland offered by extremists and hence, honestly sympathise with them; but after learning its processes do not want to walk the talk.
‘Fixing’ Pakistan is and never will be an easy task. The uniqueness of its inception means that its problems are also, in some ways, unique and not easy to solve. ‘Fixing’ Pakistan, therefore, will be a long and arduous task and can only be undertaken if we first address its abstract, yet critical, thought processes. Being self-confident, working with our own strengths, and actually focusing on processes rather than the perfect end result, might just be the beginning.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 28th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (83)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Truth Told: History of Afghan invasions of India came to halt only for a few centuries. It is going to repeat itself. Brace for it, period. Your denying it, won’t stop it. Don’t confuse the last few centuries as giving you enough strength to resist, they were a breather.
Almost all the turkic invaders that entered India did so after decimating the lands and the armies of what is now known as Pakistan and Afghanistan. What was significant about each and every invasion though was how meekly the people of these countries surrendered to these turkic hordes. In fact what Ghaznavi did to Lahore and Babar did to Kabul should make the point abundantly clear. And going by your attitude one can see that the future holds for you. On the other hand Indians have been able to throw off all foreign powers in due course of time. What the Marathas did to the Mughals and the Sikhs did to the Durrani's should serve as a reminder.
Indian meddling in Pakistan's affairs, is causing a drift towards driving Pakistan to march towards theocracy, which eventually is going to hurt India.
@robin: "These savages" are the ones that liberated Azad Kashmir. But for India's false promises to decide Kashmir future through an independent plebiscite, Pakistan would not have reigned them and the entire valley would have been freed of Indian yoke.
@robin: History of Afghan invasions of India came to halt only for a few centuries. It is going to repeat itself. Brace for it, period. Your denying it, won't stop it. Don't confuse the last few centuries as giving you enough strength to resist, they were a breather.
@Rex Minor: The English Oxford Lexicon is a dictionary rex. No sensible person making a rational argument can claim a definition printed in a dictionary to be the sole and irreconcilable truth in such a matter.
@Khadim Karrar: It's your mistake to believe that we in india wish for these barbarians to take over your land, as much as it's your mistake to think that these savages have any support base in India or for that matter can cause us any harm. If after 66 years and your efforts both overt and covert have not yielded you an inch in kashmir, and neither have these ideological currents failed to find favor among any sections of indian muslims, then how can they ever hurt us. In fact they can't even hurt your nation, as long as you don't let their ideology become national narrative. That is where the challenge is. i hope you can appreciate that.
@Khadim Karrar: So you're saying that its game over Pakistan? That you've handed the victory cup, in this case your nation, over to the these people who've never really been in control of their own lands in close to 3000 years.
The time is not far when Indians would also become quislings of another wave of Afghan Muslim who shall invade India once Pakistan lets them to. Be beholden to Pakistan who acts as a buffer.
@np: See the similarity between the Persian “punj” and the Sanskrit “punch” and also the similarity between Persian “aab” and Sanskrit “ap.” But for variations between the two languages, since Punjab sounds closer to the Persian version of the words, it is more likely that this word has Persian roots. Similarly, Pak in Pakistan is exactly from the Persian word “pak.” And, stan is also exactly Persian as it is in the Persian words, “Afghanistan,” “Kurdistan,” etc.
@BruteForce: I think that Indians have difficulty understanding the history of Pakistan because they don't know that Pakistan is not only in South Asia but parts of it are considered as being Middle eastern or Central Asian too. They find it easy to ignore this reality but just take a look at the differences in the native peoples of Pakistan compared to Indians. Also, Ahmad Shah Abdali was born in Multan in present Pakistan so who are you to tell us he is a foreigner. The land and people of Pakistan have been part of Persia, Greek Empire, Mughal Empire and have many influences. Indians like to generalize but they don't want to accept the diversity of Pakistan's peoples and history because it threatens them. You can see how desperate they are on this web site to try to deny Pakistan as anything other than India! British did a good job of brainwashing Indians!
ET editorial board, I love the articles written by Prof. Bangash & thoroughly enjoy reading them. Please restore his frequency to 'weekly' status as before. I would be grateful if you did this. Thanks in advance, K B Kale, Indonesia
why indianos are so worried about us please guys go solved your problems and leave us alone the way we did it seven decades ago.
@GoSilver:
Hinduism is not a religion per say but a cult based on ancient tradions and culture lacking in morality and ethics, and without recognising the super authority of God the creator, who demands obedience and worship.. It accepts in its midst atheism, agnostics and all those who refuse to accept the divine scriptures of the Ibrahimic religions.
Rex Minor.
@Rex Minor - "Why not name the Indian heroes?"
Some of these are - Chandragupta Maurya - King Porous (now can be considered Pakistani) - Prithviraj Chouhan - Shivaji - Rana Pratap - Akbar - Ashoka - Lachit Bhadphukan - Chola & Pandya kings in Southern India - Queen of Jhansi - Ahilyabai Holkar - Durgadas Rathod
Philosophers & Scientists - Adi Shankaracharya (philosopher) - Aryabhatta (mathematician & astronomer) - Bhaskaracharya (mathematician & astronomer) - Panini (probably a Pakistani) - Shushrut (medicine) - Charvaka (atheism philosophy) - Chanakya (statescraft & economist) - Gautama Buddha (founder of Buddhism) - Mahavira (founder of Jainism)
You get confidence when you achieve something. It is natural to be impressed with someone's progress (if you lack it in your own country). . I visited Dubai and saw Italian/Spanish/French nationals looking for jobs. Later I found on their facebook pages words like 'Marhaba' or 'Salam'. Had we built our land, we would have seen European taking interest in our art, culture, language.
@Truth Re Told:
Why not name the Indian heroes? The muslims who talk about Persia or Turkey are mostly those whose ancestors converted to Islam.
Rex Minor
Hinduism was also a central Asian religion, besically
Truth Told, Indians might have come from Africa, but they speak of India and India alone. The only people who talk of Persia and Turkey are Muslims. That is the difference between the two.
@Rex Minor: And, isn't also true that a number of Indian heroes, and quite a few of them during the times of Vedas, came from Persia?
@Brute Force:
And pray tell us please about the Indian heroes?. Not everyone on this post were several civiliser is a Pakistani and it would be of great interest to learn about the non muslim Indian heroes as well. There were several civiIisations in the region that we do not know too much about them and others disappearing without any plausible explanation or concrete traces. The term 'hindu' was given to the folks by the Persians and so is the name 'Hindukush' for the mountain range.
. Rex Minor,
Aren't you reading too much by citing a few number plates with Al-Bakistan on them? Also, very few Pakistanis speak with American accent and similarly your citing of foreign influence characteristics is truly an exaggeration. You fail to define or even describe what a common Pakistani, if indeed, there is one, is like. That is a daunting task but well worth the effort. Please endeavor to meet this challenge and enlighten us. Thanks.
Bang on target, Well done! We, as a nation look like "a lost identity" case. Reading through your article, I felt, as a nation we are like a sponge which can soak up everything but fails to leave a mark of its own!
@Mehmoob Khan: A lot of insecurity that only points to your Indian origins. Why are so many Indian trolls (BruteForce, Avatar etc) obsessed with posting on Pakistan blogs under either real or imagined names? I think India has a greater issue with insecurity since it is always obsessed with Pakistan and wants to stamp out all foreign Muslim culture - the problem is that nothing will remain!
Grace: You pretty much sum up what is wrong with Pakistan! Have you ever asked Arabs or Persians if they think of Pakistanis as part of their "Muslim" culture?
I dont know if moderators would let my comment to be published or not. And i also know that most people will not like my comment. And let me also clarify that I am a conservative person who would better vote for right wing parties than secular left wing parties.
But in my humble opinion, Pakistan was created more at the behest of British empire's tactical strategy of dividing India than due to the efforts of our leaders at that that time. The sudden coming together of diverse personalities from different backgrounds does not seem natural. Quaid was a secular person who liked flaunting his British clothes and shoes more than wearing the traditional muslim dress of Shalwar Kameez(I would not dare question his sincerity but he was no symbol Pakistani Muslim nationalism like Gandhi was a symbol of Indian Hindu Nationalism in person and character). Similarly Sir Agha Khan, the first Muslim League president belonged to a sect which has no dreams of Islamic nationalism and which would like secular system more than true Muslim state which was supposedly the cause for creating Pakistan. Iqbal was a dreamer of Islamic Renaissance.
So it was an unnatural nexus by diverse leaders from different backgrounds and these differences were never meant to be reconciled. Iqbal's admirer's want an Islamic state like that of Medina, Quaid's admirers want a secular Muslim state like Turkey. And they are both our national heroes.
Perhaps, after creation if our leaders succeeded in giving us something truly exceptional like Napolean's conquest of most of Europe, Hitler's ambition of 1000 years Aryan rule over the world, America's dream of being the leader of the new world, etc. then perhaps we would feel proud to call ourselves Pakistanis. But unfortunately all the attempts by our leaders are mostly aimed at prolonging their rule on this clueless nation whether by being sycophantic to America or by licking the feet of our neighboring Arab monarchs.
Our attempts at becoming the first Islamic nuclear power succeeded mostly due to some not-so-ethical acts of stealing rather than actual scientific research. So this too, despite giving us a sense of security vis-a-vis Indian aggression, is nothing much to be proud of.
So it simply does not make sense to be proud of being a Pakistani....why try?
Always enjoy reading you. Pakistan is directionless in more ways that one but yet it stumbles along..........defying many. Possibly that is how it was meant to be, we will never know otherwise until some force provides a direction.
We need a strong liberal system here which would be able to implement laws justly. People are required to be transformed to think optimistically, be sincere and honest to their professions and ultimately have spirit of love with Pakistan. I think we need to hold each others hands to come out of problems rather than pointing fingers at each other.
Because blaming and degrading others will not help Pakistan to be prosperous.
If we think our educational system is weak and we have a strong educational background we should contribute to make it error free.
Yes we want all the benefits of democracy but don't want to pay taxes. Yes I want to have good laws but not applicable to me. In Pakistan people have lot of misconception . There is nothing free and has never been.
Mr Khan Bangash writes well, recalls history which is good if there are lessons to be learnt and as long as one does not ignore the period related to it. People who make history becme legends, are turned into stories to be told to children. Todays Pakistan has more or less a two century history of colonial period; which has influenced its cultures to a great extent and prevents them to become a cohesive independent Nation, not yet at least. Peoples orientation is towards anglo saxons in terms of language and psyche who were their occupiers. It is good that Mr Khan Bangash is showing his national feelings but it will take time before Pakistan becomes a Nation.
Rex Minor
I think Punjab should also be transliterated to Al Bunjab
I think you are making a mountain out of a mole hill. We too lived in the UAE and laughed when Arabs could not pronounce Pakistan or would call the nation " Al Bakistan". I think Pakistanis as a nation are confident of themselves and their identity - hence such non issues do not concern us. We know that Pakistan is Pakistan and those of use with the most minimum of schooling will still know that the very name Pakistan is a Persian root word just as the Punjab is a Persian root word. No Punjabi wants to be called Bunjabi because we understand that. Turkish dramas, American movies or British documentaries just reflect a globalizing Pakistan. Frankly I think it's better than watching Indian movies and Saas Bahu dramas which are even more alien and foreign to Pakistanis. I don't know how you would want Shah Jahan or any of the Mughals to forward Indian culture because there was no real Indian culture except for that which is found in the deep south of India - all the stuff in the north is largely copied from Muslim civilizations outside of South Asia. When you think about the Mughals, they themselves came from outside of South Asia and ruled the area- so why would they want to celebrate Indian culture? They were not Indians and did not identify themselves as such. They were Mughals.
@Author With great respect to you, I think there is nothing to be "fixed" in Pakistan. This is how it was supposed to be. Jinnah had chosen this for you. I respect him for that as an Indian for obvious reasons. Please do not delete my comment because I am being sincere.
Why not Pakistan-ized? Simply because we as a nation refuse to acknowledge our roots to the land where we belong i.e. India, with its multitude of religions, cultures, ethnicity and languages. Embrace our roots without giving up your Pakistani statehood and see how quickly we eliminate terrorism and all other social inadequacies.
Confused English man nhahahahaha
Quaid Azam allways wore western three piece suit and cigar in hand with British accent English and then he made Pakistan the muslim country with Shalwar kamiz national dress Urdu which he very rare spoke as a national language then English official lang that 80% of peoples of this country don't know and the English speakers think Urdu speakers uneducated and vis virsa and whats wrong if Al Bakistan or Al Bunjab.....
Bravo !
Not to be pedantic, but it is not proper Arabic to say Al Bakistan; the definitive article "al" (the) is not used as Bakistan is quite definite in itself and is a foreign proper noun that has no Arabic origin whatsoever.
So you might want to correct those number plates. ;)
My two cents -- Happy debating!
You are so right here. Our burger population has to speak English with an American or at least British accent. And our maulvi has now learned the perfect Arabic accent and uses it to exhibit his superiority over others.
And most funny are those folks who have lately realized that Urdu has many Arabic words in it and they want to purify Urdu by uses Arabic accent for Arabic words even though they're speaking Urdu.