data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472c9/472c991d74d953b87652d00a31509baac67ff47d" alt="the writer retired from pia in 2008 after 33 years of service malik tariq tribune com pk the writer retired from pia in 2008 after 33 years of service malik tariq tribune com pk"
There are reports that almost two years ago, this draft proposed by the three rich cricket boards was discussed in an ICC meeting attended by the PCB chairman and Chief Operating Officer (COO) Subhan Ahmed for restructuring of the ICC, with India using its financial powers in tandem with Australia and England in a bid to acquire control of the ICC through veto powers, giving these countries the power to censure any member country on any ground, even if such a move is opposed by majority of other countries. However the Pakistani delegation chose not to alert the patron or the PCB board members and chose to be subservient to India and accepted the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s hegemony. Thereafter, in the last ICC Executive Board meeting attended by Chairman Najam Sethi and the COO, the issue was discussed again, but the patron was still not informed about this proposed plan and its dangers. Whatever the goals of our foreign office vis-a-vis cricket diplomacy, the fact remains that if India were to reciprocate and cooperate with Pakistan, the ban on holding international matches on Pakistani soil could have been removed by now, because an almost similar or even worse security crisis exists in Bangladesh and earlier was present in Sri Lanka, too, during the days of the Tamil-backed insurgency in that country.
Political appointments in the PCB have had an adverse impact on not just the board, but also our domestic cricket structure. In addition, the PCB has also been playing a subservient role to the BCCI on many occasions to its own detriment, with no reciprocal gestures of goodwill.
The patron of the PCB needs to take note of dangers facing Pakistan cricket and use his powers to appoint men of integrity and international stature, who are well versed in ICC affairs, to head the PCB. As it is, following the collapse of our domestic cricket structure, there exist neither genuine zonal boards, nor clubs owning playing fields and teams, which could claim voting rights to select the PCB head. It is a fallacy to hand over the PCB to former cricketers, even if it is through the election process, without putting preconditions that they must have minimal education qualifications with administrative experience in an organisation of repute.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 25th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.a
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ