Controversy: PCB chairman Ashraf’s reinstatement challenged

Govt files appeal in apex court against IHC’s January 15 order.


Hasnaat Malik January 24, 2014
Zaka Ashraf. PHOTO: TARIQ HASSAN

ISLAMABAD:


Challenging Islamabad High Court’s (IHC) January 15 order for restoration of Zaka Ashraf as chairman Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), the government on Thursday requested the apex court to stop him from taking part in the affairs of the PCB.


The government said that even before it received the IHC’s January 15 detailed judgment, Zaka Ashraf had taken physical control of the PCB.

“Since then respondent 1 (Zaka Ashraf) has started a process of vendetta through arbitrary hiring and firing so much so that amongst the casualties was also the longstanding legal adviser of the PCB, who cautioned against any premature action. A chaotic situation has been unleashed by the respondent no1,” the petition said.

It added that Ashraf had already initiated the process for the removal of the PCB arbitrators/adjudicators, who were all former judges of superior courts.

“Respondent no 1 is… taking undue advantage of the fact that the PCB constitution does not have any provision with regard to passing a No Confidence motion against the chairman in a situation where the chairman becomes destructive to the institution,” it alleged.

Ministry of Inter Provincial Coordination moved the petition through Barrister Asma Jahangir under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution for leave to appeal against the IHC division bench’s verdict.

The petition further said the government had amended the PCB constitution, through an SRO issued on October 14, 2013. Afterwards, an Interim Management Committee (IMC) comprising five members was appointed and they unanimously elected Najam Sethi as chairman of that committee, it said.

“Since then the IMC had been managing the affairs of the PCB. Further the earlier SRO dated Oct 14,  2013 was further extended for a period of 90 days on January 10, 2014 and the said SRO is still in field,” said the petition.

The petition contended that the SRO (1) October 14, 2013, which had so far not been declared as illegal or without lawful authority, be recognised as the valid and legal instrument in appointing the management of the PCB, especially as it has also been extended through notification dated January 10, 2014.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 24th, 2014.

COMMENTS (4)

oBSERVER | 10 years ago | Reply

The mere fact that Sethi an incompetent and highly dubious character is involved makes this challenge untenable.

Hehe | 10 years ago | Reply

Somebody plz tell Sethi to get over his removal and stop asking the government to challenge the IHC orders. Let Zaka complete his 4 year tenure and give him a chance to prove his mettle.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ