Remittances up 9.4% in first half of FY14

Saudi Arabia takes the lead with amount of $2.2 billion.


Our Correspondent January 10, 2014
Home bound: $7.8b are the remittances sent by overseas Pakistanis in the first half of the current fiscal year. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI:


Overseas Pakistani workers remitted $7.79 billion in the first half of the current fiscal year, an increase of 9.4% compared with $7.11 billion received during the same period of the last fiscal year, a statement released by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) said.


The inflow of remittances in July-December from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, United States, United Kingdom, other Gulf countries, including Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman, and European Union (EU) countries amounted to $2.2 billion, $1.57 billion, $1.24 billion, $1.13 billion, $897.69 million and $216.57 million, respectively. In contrast, inflows from respective
countries in the corresponding period of fiscal year 2012-13 were $1.96 billion, $1.46 billion, $1.15 billion, $1 billion, $811.18 million and $188.77 million.

Remittances received from Norway, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Japan and other countries during the first half of current fiscal year amounted to $511.42 million as opposed to $534.68 million received in the first half of the last fiscal year.

 photo 18_zpsc8abc3b5.jpg

In December 2013 alone, the inflow of remittances from Saudi Arabia, UAE, US, UK, other Gulf countries and EU members amounted to $410.01 million, $275.12 million, $223.96 million, $177.09 million, $165.05 million and $37.43 million, respectively.

Remittances received from Norway, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Japan and other countries during December 2013 amounted to $96.05 million, the SBP said.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 11th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ