Pervez Musharraf. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE
ISLAMABAD:
The federal government on Monday finalised the charge-sheet in the high treason case against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf.
The document catalogues five charges against Musharraf including imposing emergency in the country on November 3, 2007, detaining superior courts’ judges and abrogating the constitution by imposing the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO).
Speaking on the condition of anonymity, government officials said they could back all the charges listed against the former president with ‘written evidence’. “We have the original copies of his (president Musharraf’s) written orders authorising emergency in the country besides other unconstitutional steps,” said the official.
Musharraf is the country’s first military ruler to be charged for treason, and a conviction could lead to life imprisonment or the death penalty.
The interior secretary, who is the complainant representing the state in the treason trial, will officially submit a copy of the charges against Musharraf before the registrar of the special court set up for Musharraf’s trial under Article 6 of the Constitution.
The nine-page document also refers to the powers assumed by the ex-military chief to amend the 1973 Constitution.
In the light of the inquiry report prepared by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the charge sheet held Musharraf “solely responsible” for abrogating the constitution with no collaborators.
Where are Musharraf’s collaborators?
The former president has been denying the existence of any written orders that could prove he committed treason. A member of Musharraf’s legal team Ahmed Raza Kasuri accused the government of deliberately hiding the para 2 of Article 6 of the Constitution.
“Para 2 has these three magic words, ‘collaborators, abettors or those who aid’ and they refer to all the collaborators as guilty of treason,” Kasuri told The Express Tribune. If Musharraf committed treason then all those who supported his acts should be charged with the same and brought before the court, he added.
Kasuri said the same constitutional provision states that any ‘act of treason’ cannot be validated by any higher court.
He said all members of parliament and provincial assemblies who validated the emergency were collaborators. All the judges who legalised the October 12, 1999 acts and validated the PCO were liable to treason as well, Kasuri added.
Accusing the government of interference, Kasuri said FIA was directed to focus only on the former president and not the collaborators. “But the court’s hands are not tied. We demand the court include all the collaborators,” said Kasuri.
A three-member special court has been set up for the treason trial.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 10th, 2013.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The most disgraceful act of this family based government (as there is no sign of governance anywhere in the country), which couldn't do anything for the people. Instead they are humiliating Musharraf, whose whole tenure was filled with public welfare. Most interestingly the Indians are enjoying the whole drama of Musharraf's humiliation, as he had booted them out of Kargil. Nawaz Sharif should be tried for creating humiliating environment for the Army as an institution, which reacted in response and turned over his government. Musharraf then serving COAS, was in the air and being pushed to land in Indian custody, had to accept the overall act of Army as an institution. Should this Choudhry as the Chief Justice, not be tried for instigating, coaxing and instigating people through newspapers to make concocted cases against Musharraf?
Life imprisonment or death - Waaaah, it's very disappointing to use this sort of language for a leader who sacrificed his entire life fighting for the country and doing everything possible for the progress and prosperity of Pakistan. No one can even dare to give any harm to this great leader, while I am very disappointed because of the words used by the unprofessional writer.