Stopping Nato supplies that sustain troops of 47 countries in Afghanistan is a confrontational stance on the part of Imran Khan and his PTI. Maybe it is a symbolic protest and might end in a day or two, but the message it would send to the large number of countries involved will further damage the image of our nation, which is already very bad. The blockade won’t starve the Nato troops in Afghanistan or seriously impact their mission. Nor would it hurt their war efforts that are on a very low scale, as they have started winding down their military engagement. By all indications, they are on the way out.
Imran Khan has been consistent in his opposition to drone strikes for good reasons — innocent lives lost along with the terrorists, fear and insecurity in the tribal regions and more importantly, angering the local population and fuelling militancy. These are very valid reasons and his cause against the drone strikes has found a lot of support in the humanist and genuinely liberal sections of the world population. Pakistani ‘liberals’, of course, don’t think the way the rest of the liberal world thinks and it is not surprising that those of them commenting on the media sing praises for the drones because some of the missiles fired by drones, according to them, have landed on the ‘right’ heads. My view is that it is morally wrong to cause death and destruction to peaceful, civilian populations, and it doesn’t serve any long-term objectives of our national security either. Just imagine the anger of the tribes losing their loved ones. In this region, it never ends unless an offence is avenged. Since the drones and their button-pushers are invisible and remote, the tribes have taken on the Government of Pakistan and security forces.
Having said this, blocking roads and leading major protests on the roads is not the right strategy. In many ways, what Imran Khan has done will hurt Pakistan more than it would help. It seems Imran is taking the too familiar and convenient route of populism — saying and doing things that would please peoples and garner support — than making hard and rational choices. Why is his road occupation strategy a wrong strategy? With the much desired democratic transition having taken place in Pakistan, it seems we are moving fast into a protest political culture. Protest culture has badly damaged many countries in the world and in our case, with so many polarisations and conflicts, it will be disastrous. Today, it’s one political party, tomorrow, it could be another and this could be parallel to water and power riots and religious factions taking to the streets and on their way, damaging public and private property. Leaders of major political parties must establish different standards of conduct and stand out from the rest, rather than follow the popular current such as Imran appears to be doing.
I admire Imran’s courage, optimism and confidence but at the same time, I am worried about him flowing with the popular wave of anti-Americanism and anti-Western attitudes. Any seasoned politician would be more pragmatic, wired to the world and bold enough to defy popular sentiments than contribute to confrontation with the world. That will not serve Pakistan’s interests.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 26th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Make reason thy master
Make reason thy master Imran sb.Better think twice to stop dharna politcs.it will be futile .You won"t get ur desired result
: @Sexton Blake:
Very well said!
Habib ur Rehman, Imran Khan is against the Drones and so are others peace loving people of the world; it is the Drones which are terrorising civilian inhabitants of the region with their noisy overflights. The victims are not the terrorists but those who are terrorising the victims are the perpatrators of terrorism be it the individuals or State sponsored. Sooner or later the USA administration will have to answer for their deeds. Sir, your narrative is based on misinformation and fabricate fibs; you must try to comprehend the basics that neither a military or a political entity has any jurisdiction over the freedom and the independence of the individual or communities. People are born free, have the right to freedom and to choose their destiny. Force cannot be the opition for the democratic order.
Imran Khan is not a friend of the Talibans nor a man of vision but a genuine friend of the Pakistan army and has keen interest to help restore peace of whatever is left of Pakistan. The Talibans have defeated many armies of the world and are capable to remain engaged with Pakistan army as well for decades to come if they must Imran Khan fully knows this option.
Rex Minor
Once again the basic premise of most people is incorrect. The Taliban were the legitimate Government of Afghanistan, but with Pakistan support were overthrown by America. Ever since then the Taliban have mysteriously been labelled as terrorists. Very strange.
Imran is all in and all out against the drone attacks on Pakistani territory because drones kill innocent civilians and violate Pakistan's sovereignty. Well and good.
He has however, never acknowledged that most of the victims of drones are terrorist leaders using Pakistani territory to kill soldiers and civilians on the other side of border. He seems to think that Pakistan has a right to harbour terrorists within its borders. He also seems to think that it is neither a violation of UN resolution, nor a violation of international law. Therefore, he has never asked the federal government to stop terrorist raids from our territory into Afghanistan. Probably, he denies that such activities are taking place, in the first place. He is in a state of total denial.
He has never condemned TTP for whatever atrocities they have committed on Pakistani (equally innocent) public. He also seems to think that Taiban exist only because of drone attacks and they have no agenda except for avenging the attacks. He also seems to think that Taliban have a right to avenge drone attack on the innocent Pakistani public. That's why he thinks we will have fruitful peace talks as soon as the drones are stopped or shooted down.
Does the TTP agree with him. Alas, it doesn't. It first put forward a charter of 10 unacceptable preconditions for talks which resembled their earlier program in Swat, and then rejected the talks, altogether.
@author: Take a proper stance, you cannot have feet in two boats. It is clear IK is aligned with right wing and ultimately with terrorist sympathizers if not terrorists themselves and he is on the wrong side.
Not sure how author can avoid discussing the obvious --- why is Pakistan allowing terrorist to use it's territory to attack it's neighbors and allies - wheres the moral justification in that?
Who is Pakistn's enemy? India-Afghanistan or Pakistani themselves? We dont need these type of politicians and rulers too.
The author has choosen the right profession but is making a denk fehler(unsound thinking) if he reckons that Pakisan has the responsibility to provide infra structure for NATO war machinery in the neighbouring Afghanistan and at the expensed of its on people. Any military man with the intelligence of an insect should have known that once one agrees to provide the use of air space or roads one bedcomes automaticaly a party in the conflict. Close down the highways if one must, terminate the contracts if the former military man has made, adopt non violence as the integral part of the foreign policy. Let those who seek wars and hegemony go where the pepper grows, political leadership is responsible alone for the peace and the prosperity of its own people. It must assert itself on the world stage.
Rex Minor
"My view is that it is morally wrong to cause death and destruction to peaceful, civilian populations, and it doesn’t serve any long-term objectives of our national security either. Just imagine the anger of the tribes losing their loved ones." Well author, I am afraid I cannot accept the accuracy of this statement. These are not peaceful civilians if they are sheltering the likes of Hakeemullah or benefit from their extortion money. Do they really love the country they live in? Nobody is happy to lose their loved ones specially those who get blown up in suicide bombings controlled and inspired by these radicals. There is only one way to deal with this menace. Eleminate their existence by whatever means possible and as quickly as possible. That is an imperative for national security otherwise you may not have a voice left to write these columns. Fazlullah will see to that. Finally, do not even for moment be under the illusion that all that the TTP want is the imposition of Sharia. No sir, they want to rule Pakistan like Mullah Omar in Afghanistan.
Shame on you for writing a whole lot of non sense.
Isn't his government democratically (in your articles,you put a lot of emphasis on democracy) elected,and his policies/views were same before elections,so the people of KPK want him to rule with the policy he declared.