We went to the polls in search of a solution to what is, ostensibly, a basic problem. Six months on, it seems as if we are back to square one. But that is where we are wrong. You see, democracy is an interesting beast. It heals, but in a manner that is more painful than we would like. It is a drawn out, evolutionary process. It requires patience and maturity.
Turkey’s example demonstrates as much. In 2002, the Justice and Development (AK) Party came to power in a landslide victory. Since then, three AK governments have brought tangible change on multiple fronts.
In the past decade, Turkey has grown at a rapid pace while keeping inflation in check. The country has become a model for economic development in the region. Its GDP per capita has skyrocketed from $3,500 in 2002 to $10,000 today. Exports are now at $114 billion, increasing from $36 billion in 2002. Turkey’s annual GDP is $780 billion — three times what it was 11 years ago. The country is now the world’s sixteenth largest economy. In 2002, inflation was at a crippling 65 per cent. In 2010, inflation hit a 41-year low of 4.9 per cent.
Successive AK Party governments have unified the hospital system in the country and substantially improved access to healthcare. In 2003, 39.5 per cent of Turkish citizens were satisfied with their health care. In 2011, that figure almost doubled to 76 per cent (compare this with a satisfaction of 62 per cent in the European Union).
The law and order situation has improved with crime rates steadily declining. A country that suffered from significant mafia control is now devoid of a mafia presence.
On the foreign policy front, Turkey has worked to improve relations with its neighbours while pulling its weight in the global diplomatic scene. From having isolationist inclinations, the country has progressed to having lofty ambitions for regional influence. While the Syria conundrum is one that has impacted progress on the foreign policy front, the improvement in the past decade is undeniable.
How can we bring a similar age of progress to Pakistan? A short history lesson will provide the answer.
The Turkish Republic was officially proclaimed on October 29 in 1923. From 1923 to 1943, there was a single-party government in the country as Mustafa Kemal Ataturk led the nascent nation. Post-Ataturk, the country struggled as it tumbled into a cycle of repeated political and economic crises.
In 1980, the military came to power for the third and final time as the country descended into anarchy. Three years later, elections were held and Turgut Ozal, a respected bureaucrat, came to power. Ozal liberalised the Turkish economy and pursued a more open foreign policy. Despite having an initial impact, Ozal also struggled once he became president in 1989.
The following decade saw the Turkish economy turn back the clock as a series of coalition governments pushed the country into a sticky abyss. But despite the ups and downs, the Turkish people remained true to the system. In 2002, they went to the polls and brought substantial change with the landslide election of the AK Party. Ever since then, they have reaped the benefits of their patience.
The sad truth is that democracy is no magic wand. As much as we would like it to be, the hype is not realistic. The reality is that we are on a very bumpy road. It is always winding and often dark. But we must continue in a patient manner, with our foot strongly on the pedal. The modus operandi is not to wait and watch, but to act and be patient. We are currently in flux and it should be expected that this flux brings with it undesirable outcomes. But if we carry on, we will reach our destination. The journey is the challenge, the destination the reward.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 9th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Aish khan:
By eastern I guess you mean a developing country whereas Turke is a developed one?
Rex Minor
@x: @rafia noor: @unbelievable: @whitsky:
Let us please do not ignore the fact that Turkey is ruled by the popular religious political establishment which has declassified its kemalist military by retiring most and sending to prison some Generals. It is gradualy desecularising the laws of the country by removing the ban on head covers for female university students and certain state employes, uncontrolled sale of liquar off bar in stores, and lately the discouragement and the prevention of unmarried couples living in partnership. I personaly support the christian or muslim majority countries whose constitutions reflect the values derived from the scriptures and their Governments function secularly independent of the religious institutions or bodies.
Pakistan could take the line from Turkey not only in economics but also in its political enterprise within the bounds of the religion of Islam.
Rex Minor
The anology drawn between turkey and pakistan doesn't come along. We seriously cannot overlook the element of being an eastern country with a stern regard for relgion and customs.a country devided and disunited over the issues of caste,sect and class. But i believe this is indeed a well written and sensible articlen, as i strongly believe that "democracy itslf is a delayed process ....but the destiny and reward is worth the delay !
Turkish dramas highlight their social situation, so different from ours. Progress is not low necks and mini dresses and alcohol but its certainly freedom to make those choices if one so wishes. Turkey is secular, gives freedom whereas we do not.
a very well thought and well wirtten article, based on the comparative study of the two countries discussed. Economy, health,law and order situation, foriegn policy; these issues are well written and the role of military . regarding the secularism of the country, Turkey is not told or said to be an IDEAL COUNTRY to be followed in every aspect. secularism is due to the OTTOMAN EMPIRE , to end the ottoman empire from turkey, the elites deliberately injucted the non-islamic values and practices, so there will be no more emergence of KHILAFAT MOVEMENTS that can take the whole world into ISLAMISATION . this article dont suggest us to follow the social structure of the country but to follow the economic and political structure. and i think we as a nation instead of incorporating the positive qualities of nation into our country, we start behaving like pessimists, those always find an excuse to tread onto a hardship path, by making lame excuses of NON-ISLAMIC behavior of so and so country, so we condemn their everything .
Pakistani authors like to use Turkey as an example of what's possible - but most ignore the obvious The key to Turkey's success is it's close ties to the West and the fact that it's a secular country. Sometimes I wonder if anyone in Pakistan understands that Turkey is a long standing member of NATO - has troops in Afghanistan - etc.
Pakistan with its Islamic society and its inclination towards religion is not comparable with Turkey. Of course there will always be a process of learning through trial and error method and the emphasis is on the democratic system to continue.
Nice article Ibrahim and Congrats another Khan on Tribune now. You'll have to come up with some great articles to catch up to Asad.
The literacy rate thereof was what held them in good stead for where they were headed. Whereas here, with our lot, nomatter how many a lofty idea the govt. may be harboring as to the progress of the country, it shall remain a distant possibility for any progress per se would need to be helped by the people of Pakistan who, for the most part, have to have an education first.
A very well written article which recognises the progress Turkey has made in the economic field as well as in its foreign policy eversince the popular Islamic political party came into power. The author has by design or error omitted the role of secularism and the strong Kemalist military in the domestic policies.
Is the newly elected Prime Minister of Pakistan strong enough to follow what occured in Erdogan Turkey? As an outsider I am not sure, besides the current Prime Minister earlier experience with the military was not positive and cost the country a military rule for more than a decade..
Rex Minor
Comparing us to Turkey is like comparing apples and oranges.They had strong institutions and a dedicated leadership(Erdogan,Gul). We are pretty much a two party system,where both parties are 2 sides of the same coin...and politicians know only one thing-how to make more money.