Despite unanimous resolution, many ambiguities remain as to what may happen after Nov 20. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE
The provincial government managed to pass a much-hyped resolution against drone strikes and Nato supplies earlier this week. However, what this resolution is going to achieve is still unclear.
After long deliberations with opposition lawmakers on Monday, the assembly unanimously passed the resolution, which seemed softer in what it asserted as compared to what Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan had claimed after the killing of Hakimullah Mehsud in a US drone strike last Friday.
The resolution brought nothing to the fore that had not already been discussed. It asked the federal government to take practical steps to stop drone attacks and Nato supplies by November 20, otherwise, the province will pursue its own course of action. However, the resolution stopped short of elucidating what that course of action might be.
Constitutional expert Advocate Qazi Anwar said the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government cannot stop Nato supplies through a resolution. “The only way Nato supplies can be stopped is if the people of K-P came out and stopped them. The government does not have the mandate to do so,” he said.
“Who is going to decide the next course of action?” asked Anwar. “Will the provincial assembly convene again after the expiry of the deadline?”
He explained three grounds on which the provincial government cannot stop Nato supplies. Firstly, he said, the roads used for transporting these facilities fall under the domain of the federal government. Secondly, Nato supplies fall under foreign affairs, which again makes it a federal subject where the provinces have no powers. Lastly, Anwar pointed out that these supplies were not only American but rather there were several other countries with military presence in Afghanistan. “Can we move against all these countries at once?” he questioned.
“If the federal government passes a resolution directly asking the provincial government to do something, it is binding, but not the other way round,” added Anwar, implying the final decision will lie with the centre.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 8th, 2013.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1725030039-0/Untitled-design-(2)1725030039-0-405x300.webp "article")
@Abdul Kadir , Who told you it is only upto 2015 . As per my knowledge Pakistan has committed at the floor of UN general assembly before the world community the total eradication terrorists and their breeding ground from the country . She has signed a MOU with NATO and US saperatly to work togather for this perpose then how there can be a time limit for the on going operation . So far Drone is concerned , it is not being operated by army but an expert team of scientists for which no law exist at international court of justice . It's operation can only be regulated by scientists community of the world who has credit to shape the mordern world and it's destiny .......????
There is an agreement between NATO and Pakistan to allow NATO supplies till 2015. A resolution is not required in the National Assembly but only an executive order to revoke the agreement, if Pakistan is ready to face severe consequences.
Let KP separate
Pashtuns don't bow to anyone ,not US and def not Punjab
if KPK govt stops nato supplier, then pak army might come into picture, to gently nudge kpk govt to fall in line
PTI government must not misuse the mandate of people of Pakhtunkhwa. They were elected to run a responsible government and lead them to 21st century needs. Such immature acts will create more trouble for the troubled people of Province and Pakistan.
first of all the heading is wrong. Drones is federal issue plus it takes place in fata where there is no kpk authority