Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa has been battered relentlessly ever since the PTI came to power. The party’s leadership never tires of calling this 'Amreeka ki jang'. Who are we kidding here? I vividly recall the exceptional siege of Khar — the headquarters of the Bajaur Agency — by Sufi Muhammad and his armed lashkar from atop the surrounding hills way back in the mid-1990s, before 9/11, before the war on terror and before the American footprints on Afghanistan. This was just one strand of the brewing militancy in the country, which later on engulfed Swat, Buner and Lower Dir. During this period, we also witnessed mayhem in the Mominpura graveyard in Lahore, in which many innocent lives were lost. That was perhaps, the first-ever gruesome incident targeting funerals in the country. This period also saw the assassination of a leading cleric Maulana Ziaur Rehman Farooqi outside the district court in Lahore. Sectarian militants were acquiring training on the outskirts of Kabul and were guests of Mullah Omar's government. There was already a huge swathe of foreign warriors in Afghanistan — Uzbeks, Chechens, Arabs.
Given these facts, we need to desist from distorting history and calling this ‘America’s war’ and forge ahead with clarity. This brings us close to the grave problem of the never-ending supply chain of militancy in the country. Militancy in Pakistan is very distinct from militant movements in other parts of the world. Unlike movements of political and cultural rights, militancy in Pakistan is not area-specific despite tribal areas having assumed the role of being its hub. Its palpable identification with prevalent religious norms and beliefs instantly facilitates its ingress into massive swathes of the country’s population. However, it does lack the capacity to engage with regular combat troops and civil armed forces on a long-term basis. This handicap is overcome through the agility provided by staging sudden strikes, with an eagle eye kept on security gaps, and then vanishing from the scene or merging with the local population with ease.
Militant outfits are well-knit and highly autonomous with varying driving forces. They do not have an overarching command structure. Availability of an ideologically aligned human resource from across the country keeps the furnace boiling. The next stage is the transportation of this human resource to the tribal areas for training. Drug money coming in from Afghanistan, to a great degree, facilitates militant operations. According to estimates of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, accruals from opium harvesting have lately been crossing the $3 billion mark. This has been a credible source of oiling the war machine with its spillover occurring across Pakistan. Within Pakistan, donations, charities, extortion and ransom money are also providing a mixed amalgam of funding for militancy. These flows are also directed towards the subsistence of families of suicide bombers.
The presence of unregulated markets dealing in the sale of acids, chemicals and raw material for explosives is an area which has received scant attention by the various provincial governments. For instance, chemicals for explosive-laden vehicles in the attack on the Marriott Hotel, Islamabad a few years ago and in the attack on Hazaras in Quetta this year were procured from Akbari Mandi, Lahore but there has been no check on the sale of such items in this market. Ammonium nitrate, as a key ingredient of explosives, is traded in abundance without an effective monitoring system about how it is actually used. Assorted components, like ball bearings, are some of the basic lethal matter used in prosthetic vests worn by suicide bombers and are readily available. In civilised countries, it is next to impossible to get even a sleeping pill at a drug store over the counter. When will we wake up to the fact that it is necessary to bring these deadly cogs under a regulatory and enforceable framework?
Except for the Swat operation, there has been no comprehensive underpinning of militants in the strife-torn areas despite the physical presence of the army, whose personnel have laid down their lives in episodic encounters. Our political and security establishment continues to rely on an inbuilt ambiguity when it comes to setting a course on how to deal with militancy without realising that our adversary has taken advantage of this lack of clarity. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's government is running out of time. It has to move in one clear direction without any further dithering. Showing clips of APCs, which churn out nothing but bland platitudes at a time when our house is on fire, looks out of sync in the current climate.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 15th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rex Minor, " No power in the world......overpowered them ", have you taught of leaving them alone & making them live as per there rules. You try to use them for your benefit, they see through u and use u in turn, that is it. Also what I read from news is that this 60million tribesmen are fighiting each other too.
if you compare this population to Indian diverse population, then you can see, what is the difference in the living? where Indian diverse population is atleast much more varied both volume and types
@Bilal: I am not going to spend even 15 minutes but simply ask two questions to the author namely,
. does the author speak the Pashtun dialects of the tribal territory he is talking about, and
. is he aware of the culture of these tribesmen who in total exceed the mark of over 60, million, the largest tribe population in he world. And I bet that he does not. Any force which is able to do this wil break into their security system and rule them. No power in the world in their history have overpowered them!!!!
Rex Minor
Every line in this excellent piece of writing points to our shortsightedness and past follies. We are actually seeing the consequences of our past actions. The fact that we are still confused about a suitable response, and continue to grope in the dark, shows quite clearly that we have learnt no lessons. What Mohammad Hanif had termed as 'Kaffir Factory' has graduated to become a 'Shaheed Factory'. There are clear indications that we have turned many of our 'assets' towards the LOC in Kashmir in our effort to keep them occupied. We are destined to see the current mayhem continue for much more time.
@naeem khan Manhattan,Ks:
I say these were the same people who were encouraged and financed by US, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to fight the Russians and when Russians left, these same very people wanted to liberate Pakistan too from the infidels in Islamabad,
Brother, the Russians left Afghanistan way back in 1989, i.e. a full quarter century ago. Perhaps they forgot to tell you. Now that you are aware of this fact do some quick thinking,
A. Those trained by the Americans are long dead or dormant. Do names such as Rabbani, Ahmad Shah Massoud.,Abdul Rashid Dostum, Mohammad Mohaqiq, Abdul Qadir, Sayed Hussein Anwari etc ring a bell?
B. The current crop was purely a Pakistani creation. Do a search on names like Mullah Omar, Sufi Mohammed, Nek Mohammad, Ilyas Kashmiri for further enlightenment.
C. While on the subject, please also look up Gen Gul and Col Imam etc for greater clarity.
D. And you would be shocked to learn where Adnan Rashid was trained. But do find out.
Well, if Pakistan is a special case, why are the following Muslim majority states facing Islamic movements?
Afghanistan, Mali, Somalia, Libya, Egypt, Iran(once), Syria,etc.
If Pakistan is a special case, why even majority non-Muslim, but substantial Muslim population countries facing the same exact movements?
India, US, UK, Kenya, Ethiopia, Spain, etc.
Come on.. Pakistan is just ahead of the curve of most of the contenders, here. Surely, not different.
The second group at least have a chance. They can and have recognised where the problem originates. But, can the first group do the same?
A nice piece of writing. You have addressed all aspects logically. I wish to draw you attention to a couple of more points : 1. Apart from the physical menance of Taliban, we need to address the insidious "Tabilization" and its concommitant mind-set. This mind-set i beings fueled by the fifth columnist media personas and politicians. 2. Apart from drug and local donations, there are viable reports that a lot of money is also coming from UAE, Kuwait and KSA. 3. We need to reform our education also, which presently is geared to produce religious bigots. 4. Even after more than a decade no viable info/ psy - warfare operation has been mounted; which has resulted in national confusion and ambugity.
There are two main reasons : 1 which the author has rightly pointed out and we must accept it.
2 after each military Operations is such scenario, it is an international recognised strategy that económic activity is simultaneously launched in those areas in order to revive civilian activities. This unfortunately is the responsibility of the civilian govt. This is misssing due to which the terrorists regroups threathning the locals of their support. This vicious circle must be broken if we have to nip this menace in the bud.
It is plain and simple ... After the fall of Russians ..the Pakistanis thought that we have brought the giant to its knees by using the Jihadis and the militants ... We can do the same with India and the other affiliated to Indians ... So they actually nurtured the jihadis for there own use ... Pakistanis wanted to as usual BLACKMAIL the world with the lethal power of Jihadis which they had total control over ...Everybody knows why how and where OBL was .. gives a meaning to the whole story .. Unfortunately 9/11 happened and the whole game went upside down.. Rest is history ...
This article nails many lies being propagated by columnists, politicians, army and bloggers.
It is a mistake to think that Pakistan had no interest in dealing with Soviet Union.Having a belligerent super-power,that is allied to India,and bent on getting to warm waters of Indian Ocean,at one's door is hardly a palatable thing.And Pakistan acted accordingly.The blunder was to let the Jihadi forces to continue their whole apparatus,after its work was done.It was rather strengthened and fortified by the Government.The result was 9/11 and its aftermath.Pakistan had no choice other than joining the international forces against the terrorists.It would be naive to think that the war would not have followed the Al-Qaida into Pakistan,with Pakistan as an adversary.The consequencees would have been disastrous for Pakistan.(not to deny that it has been disastrous anyway,but at least Pakistan is not a pariah).It is not as simple as to label it as America's war,and Pakistan to shun its obligation and duty to reign in the terrorists on its soil.But however it is,it is Pakistan's war now,and it has to fight it.Negotiations with TTP and other terrorists is part of it,but it can not be won by diplomacy alone.
You have some very valid reasoning how to curtail this ongoing gruesome activity in Pakistan. In the US there is no way for a common person to buy Ammonium nitrate or any other chemicals which can be used potentially in terrorist activities or making illicit drugs. To buy farm chemicals, one has to be a registered practicing farmer and be registered with delivery companies too, this restriction went up right after the Oklahoma City bombings. I am surprised that even after so many devastating bombings and so many years later these chemicals were not restricted in Pakistan, it just shows the lack of resolve of the governments in different provinces of Pakistan. You have pointed out that these religious zealots were trained before 9/11 in Afghanistan, I say these were the same people who were encouraged and financed by US, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to fight the Russians and when Russians left, these same very people wanted to liberate Pakistan too from the infidels in Islamabad, in a way it was American's war then and perhaps it is their war now after 9/11 and Pakistan became a partner by one nod from a military dictators before and after 9/11. Some time I wonder if democratic governments would have gone that route which both Zia and Musharaf took while disregarding Pakistan's interests.