Basic services for all

Pakistan is undergoing a major demographic shift, which adds a new dimension to the issue of basic services.


Dr Akmal Hussain October 10, 2013
The writer is Distinguished Professor of Economics at Forman Christian College University and Beaconhouse National University

Having signed an agreement with the IMF for short-run balance of payments support, there is a tendency for a single-minded focus on ‘stabilisation’, while ignoring issues of economic growth and human welfare. In this article, I will draw upon research to suggest that not only is the universal provision of basic services necessary for achieving social justice and hence social cohesion, but could also be a key factor in sustained economic growth. Historical evidence shows that a policy of universal provisioning of education, health and social protection was a crucial precursor to the economic ‘take-off’ in a number of countries that got onto a high growth trajectory. Even more important, when most citizens in these countries had access to these services, they could develop their capabilities and thereby not only enable higher economic growth but also improve the quality of life.

Recent research by the UNDP shows that there were three common factors amongst countries that undertook universal provisioning of basic services (e.g., the Scandinavian countries, Germany, Japan, Costa Rica and China): First, in most cases, a policy of universal provisioning was adopted before their economic take-off and before they had achieved high per capita income levels. Second, the initial measures for universal provision of education, health and social protection were taken under a wide range of political structures, ranging from authoritarianism to democracy. Third, social justice was achieved not at the cost of economic growth, but became the basis of long-term growth.

Almost complete literacy was achieved in Germany by the late 18th century, while policies for universal compulsory public education were introduced in Denmark, Sweden and Norway in the first half of the 19th century. Policies for social protection, such as social insurance and medical insurance, were introduced in Germany under Bismarck and in some of the Scandinavian countries in the late 19th century. Such measures were taken before these countries became industrialised. Under very different social and political conditions, Chile introduced social protection programmes in the early 20th century, while Costa Rica adopted reforms for education, public health and social protection in the mid-20th century.

The orthodox view holds that developing countries cannot afford universal provisioning of basic services and they have to adopt a targeted approach. Evidence indicates to the contrary that many countries undertook universal provisioning of basic services when their per capita incomes were lower than that of Pakistan today. For example, when schooling was made compulsory for all children in Sweden in 1842, its per capita GDP was only GK$876, which is less than half the per capita GDP of Pakistan today at GK$2,239 (with GK$ being a hypothetical unit of currency that has the same purchasing power parity that the US dollar had in the US at a given point in time).

It can be argued that the provision of basic services can become a key factor in economic growth and is not just a palliative to the inequalities generated by a market-based growth process. In the contemporary knowledge-based economy, an educated, skilled, healthy and socially secure labour force is critical to the process of innovation that drives economic growth. In this perspective, as research by the UNDP suggests, the provision of basic services can be seen as a ‘social investment’. The provision of basic services also helps in achieving social cohesion. Recent research by economist William Easterly and earlier by Dani Rodrik shows that cohesive societies achieve higher economic growth than fragmented societies.

Pakistan is undergoing a major demographic shift, which adds a new dimension to the issue of basic services. The labour force in the age group 15 to 49, which was estimated to be 96 million in 2010, is projected to increase to 181 million by 2050. An estimated 3.1 million persons, of whom 2.1 million are young, are entering the labour force annually. If we provide education, skills, health care, social protection and livelihoods to the rapidly growing and increasingly young labour force, their creative energy can bring about a cultural, social and economic transformation. If not, the millions of deprived youngsters, ignorant, hungry and angry, can spell disaster for the country.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 11th, 2013.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

whitesky | 10 years ago | Reply

Author, It is the economy which will decide if the universal provisioning norms can be adopted even at a future date. Pressing priorities are different.

Munir Kakar | 10 years ago | Reply

Sir there is no one in the political arena to take all those issues seriously that you have eloquently described. Our national priorities are reflected in the provisioning of resources in our budgetary allocations. Education which should have been accorded highest possible priority has is regarded as the least favored and resource-starved sector. Even the resources that are specified are sub-optimally utilized. Teacher absenteeism is rampant, curricula is outdated and ideologically focused, cheating in exams is chronic. Worst of all the teachers are politicized and involved in unionism more the teaching. Every aspect of education needs to reformed. WE are precipitously moving towards apocalypse and reversing this overwhelming thrust is urgent and inevitable if we are willing to survive.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ