Indian cabinet repeals move to shield convicted MPs

The ordinance was decried by the main political opposition as unconstitutional.


Afp October 02, 2013
The ordinance was decried by the main political opposition as unconstitutional. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

NEW DELHI: India's government took a U-turn Wednesday on a move to protect convicted lawmakers after ruling Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi blasted the policy as "nonsense" in comments that opened up a rift with the prime minister.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's cabinet approved an executive order last month intended to overturn a Supreme Court ruling that national and state lawmakers convicted of serious crimes should be ejected from public office.

Following a cabinet meeting, Information Minister Manish Tewari acknowledged Gandhi's opposition, and said that "under those circumstances the decision was reconsidered" and the order, also called an ordinance, had been taken back.

The ordinance was decried by the main political opposition as unconstitutional, and condemned by anti-corruption activists who questioned the government's commitment to battling growing graft in India ahead of elections next year.

The Congress party had earlier moved a bill in parliament to protect lawmakers, but was unable to pass it. The bill will also be withdrawn in the upcoming winter session of the national assembly.

Gandhi, number two in the Congress party and chief election campaigner for Congress, dismissed the executive order last week as "complete nonsense" while Singh was on a US visit.

Singh met Gandhi, the new generation of the Gandhi-Nehru political dynasty, at his home on Wednesday morning for about 30 minutes, where the young leader reportedly apologised for the bluntness of his comments.

Amid speculation about his future, Singh stated there was "no question of resigning" as he returned from meetings with US President Barack Obama and Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif.

He also said that the ordinance had been discussed twice in cabinet and approved by the Congress party high command, headed by Gandhi's mother Sonia, which raised questions as to why Rahul had waited to air his opposition publicly.

The cabinet's ordinance would have shielded government ally Lalu Prasad Yadav, who was convicted this week of corruption. But some observers said it sent the wrong message before elections next year when graft is set to be a key issue.

"Better late than never," said Rajnath Singh, chief of main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) after the cabinet decision.

The government had argued that the Supreme Court ruling barring convicted law makers from office was unfair because it did not take into account if they had appealed against their sentences.

Ministers also said that MPs were often targeted in frivolous legal cases which could lead to them being unfairly disqualified.

Disqualification would only apply for serious crimes carrying a sentence of more than three years.

COMMENTS (6)

IndiaFirst V/s HinduRashtra | 10 years ago | Reply

Congress has capacity and responsibile to people of India. Reversing of such decision is part of maturing and consolidating democratic & secular values in India. BJP , RSS can also take leaf or two from this , by apologising all riots , demolitions done by them . India would be better place , if RSS , BJP gives its communal agenda, avoids making tall claims on so-called development and behave like mature/ responsible opposition party. By opposing GST , FDI in retail exposes double speak and duplicity of the "decisive" leadership of BJP .

Californian Desi | 10 years ago | Reply

Hopefully Indians are sane enough not to elect anyone from Gandhi family anymore. If you don;t like Modi vote for Kejriwal, but seriously your coming generations will suffer if Congress is ever again elected under Gandhi family leadership.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ