The terrorists have struck again. The blast in Kissa Khawani bazaar is the third major terrorist attack in the last week. Should the current trend continue and our government remains as indecisive, wavering and hesitant, we may see many more innocent lives lost at the hands of these terrorists.
There are only two real alternatives to the war that we fight against terror, both of which are unpleasant. Negotiate with these terrorists, who continue to murder innocents and refuse to renounce violence, or wage an all-out war against them.
Talking peace with the Taliban has taken us nowhere. All serious security analyses validate the bankruptcy of negotiating peace with Taliban as the favoured option of our state. The benchmark for those against peace talks with the Taliban is the failure of several such efforts in the past. Those still optimistic about negotiations should look at the seriousness with which these terrorists have responded to the government’s desire for peace from an all-encompassing political front – the all parties conference.
As far as waging an all-out war against the terrorists is concerned, our security establishment seems to consider it as an irresponsible choice, which entails killing our own countrymen. But are these terrorists not taking lives of innocent people, our own people on a daily basis? Where is the state response? Why is the state so reluctant to make a choice? Is it the cost and fear of implementing a high risk political and military strategy that ties our hands?
It’s time we stopped appeasing and misguiding the people of this country by our procrastinated acts of policy formulation. It’s time for policy implementation. If there was any seriousness in our approach to the national security, our anti-terrorism policy should have been on the table by now, jumpstarting the state’s response against the murderers of our people.
The army may also exercise restraint to a point. It cannot wait eternally for the democratically elected government to seek a ‘responsible end’ to this war. Although the army has pursued peace talks in the past, it realises now that this policy has failed.
The army understands that the Taliban and its many factions don’t understand the language of peace. It has for long believed that these ideological crusaders, emboldened by the reluctance of our political leadership to own this war, have in their minds the grand design of state control.
The fact that the Taliban remain resurgent, that the army has suffered huge losses in this war and that it cannot pull out its troops deployed on the western frontier means that there can only be one responsible end to this war and that is taking the war to the militants. The army knows that history will eventually judge it not for how it practised neutrality as democracy took root in the country but for how it fought when national security was threatened. The onus of responsibility on the army becomes ever enlarged when it knows that the tragedy that this nation suffers has got everything to do with the blatant mistakes committed by its own military leaders in the past.
The army’s current strategy for fighting terrorists is to keep hardening their targets while they select new soft ones. A decade of disjointed civil-military effort has only allowed terrorists to hammer us at will at times and places of their choosing. It is almost as if they are sure that the state would do nothing beyond fighting this as a defensive war.
Our preventive measures, no matter how secure, will never stop the determined terrorists. There are too many targets and there is too less money to harden all of them. Mosques, churches, hotels, schools, military establishments – we have tried to safely protect all of them. Yet the terrorists keep shifting to new targets.
We need to make a choice and make it now. Terrorists must be deterred through the fear of state retaliation and punishment.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 30th, 2013.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The military has too many choices to make before it opens fire — the good militants, the bad militants and the ugly militants. The making of these choices sap the military of its energy and will. What the author wrote sounds soothing but what the ground realities tell are bitter but factual. The fact of the matter is that Pakistan Army does not have capacity to take the war to the enemy's camp, be it professional, technical or financial. At the most, it can occupy some of their areas, but making preemptive strikes and choking their financial lifelines are unfortunately not the strongest point of our Army. And the less we talk about intelligence gathering, the better.
The army of the country should necessarily conduct all out operations against the rebels who had waged war against the state killing 45000 people including soldiers ruthlessly, irrespective of the fact they belong to the same country and religion.
Articles like these tend to ignore that the govt doesn't control the military - so does it really matter whether the govt decides that enough is enough? Sharif has many problems to resolve but none as big as his lack of control/influence over the military.
It seems word has written off Pakistan. There is hardly any condemnation from any world leader even after so many people died in Pakistan during last few days. What to talk f world leaders, even prominent Pakistani leaders haven't condemned openly in strong words. Does Pakistan have conviction to fight the monster?
wake up pakistan,
why we not all of pakistani do countrywide and even worldwide strike(sitin) against those terrorists.
Hey, guess what? Its captains and majors who shall be butchered during the full force attack you are so supportive of. Why dont you and the rest of the breed exit your comfy homes and vet your respective neighborhoods? Then ask army to cleanup the agencies. Its not a movie that you are watching. Real life war is gruesome and difficult which is fought with guns instead of mouse pointers or TV remotes.
Just see 'Aman ki Asha'... It is a done deal now, no negotiation with Terrorist states i.e. India
@Water Bottle: very interesting and short comment. So, the Pakistanis should wait how long to fix their problems? After how many more attacks and how many more dead? Please throw some light on your ingenious suggestion.
//Terrorists must be deterred through the fear of state retaliation and punishment.//
Sums it all up a dozen more of such articles and we would have the govt. ready to start acting on behalf of people of Pakistan and stop being advocate of TTP.
Why do Pakistanis seek quick-fixes to all their problems?
Spot on...talks should be held with people who respond to talks in a civilized way...in this situation another Swat like operation is needed, though its the hard choice but a necessary one.