Thanks to this path dependency, they focused more on promoting the charismatic side of Imran Khan. The strategy they adopted did produce a massive crowd of youthful supporters equipped with all possible tools of digital communication for Imran Khan. But their passionate presence on social media also made the PTI look more like a cult rather than a political party with doable ideas to govern.
For whatever reason, Imran could not make it to prime minister’s office, but for his party that is hardly the end of the world. Besides running the government in a volatile but dynamic province, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, the PTI also has an impressive presence in the National Assembly. Many youthful persons sit on the NA benches, rubbing shoulders with acclaimed professionals and veteran parliamentarians like Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Javed Hashmi. They have tremendous potential to dominate the discourse in the National Assembly with a carefully crafted script and the ability to execute the same by intelligent coordination.
Of late, many from the diehard fans and ardent admirers of Imran Khan have started to feel disappointed. They just can’t understand why he continues to promote and defend the need of engaging Taliban in negotiations for peace, even after the killing of a major general in Upper Dir and the massacre of Christians in Peshawar.
Imran Khan and his party need to wake up to the reality that their core constituency is primarily made of urbanite middle class. His supporters do not feel good about the US and feel rather annoyed with its arrogant and militaristic policies. Doing so, they do not want to look like political activists mostly identified with our religious-right. They want to appear as ‘liberals.’ Imran Khan will certainly alienate this constituency by behaving like a rigid ‘Taliban Khan.’
Javed Hashmi does appear conscious of the possible blowback: his speech in the National Assembly on Tuesday seemed to confirm his desire to retain the loyalty of the party’s urban liberals.
Legislators use this day to introduce laws in their private capacity but on this Tuesday, they all agreed to abandon that privilege and deliver speeches to express solidarity with Pakistani Christians. Notwithstanding the noble intention, they sounded duplicitous while beating their chests on the House floor.
Javed Hashmi proved an exception by bravely taking on the blasphemy law in a sincere sounding flow of empathy with minorities living in the country. Before coming to the point, though, he proudly reminded the house that even when the anti-blasphemy law was introduced in the early 1990s, he had opposed it despite sheer violation of party discipline. Those days, lest you forget, he had been a front ranking member of the PML-N. After calling it a ‘bad’ law, he firmly asserted that most people in this country abuse this law to settle personal scores. “While in jail I even met devout Muslims serving terms under the same law,” he claimed.
Sitting in the press gallery most reporters were shocked to notice that no one from the crowd of self-styled ‘liberals’ sitting on the PPP and the MQM benches cared to build any momentum in favour of Hashmi’s position during their speeches. Mindlessly indifferent they squandered away a perfect opportunity to revisit the anti-blasphemy law and prepare grounds for its reformation.
Dr Shireen Mazari did not need any tutor to discover that with clear support expressed from the PTI benches, media would prefer to presume as if Hashmi had simply stated “personal reservations” against the blasphemy law in a whimsical fit. Demanding the parliamentary review of this law was not the “PTI policy”.
After a lengthy preamble that also acknowledged the fact that she had attended Convent schools, she profusely praised the Christian community’s contribution in the fields of health and education and finally came to endorse Javed Hashmi’s demand for a dispassionate review of the blasphemy law. In the process, she also admitted that the curriculum taught at our schools for the past many decades has turned most of our youth into mindless bigots. “As a professor of Quaid-e-Azam University,” she admitted with regret, “I have personally witnessed the devastating sides of this curriculum.” I fully affirm her thoughts.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 25th, 2013.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@John: It does not have anything to do with secularism. Problem would have arisen if they were denied their right to practice their religion which was declared as a separate entity than Islam.
I salute Javed Hashami he is a man of courage and not a coward he should be the Prime Minister.
I am thankful to the
Someone above commeneted that PPP has been saying this for years and also the common perception is that they are secular.So Just a question,was declaring Ahmadis as Non Muslims by ZAB secular? Perhaps the definition of the word secular changed and i dont seem to be aware of it so someone please enlighten me.
The timing is interesting too. Could this be a make-up attempt due to the failure to properly condemn the attacks on Pakistani Christians earlier?
Regardless it is a good step by Javed Hashmi, and seems he is not beholden to the likes of Hafiz Saeed, despite his unfortunate relationship. The support from the other PTI members was a pleasant surprise too, considering their own criticized past comments in regards to Taliban extremism.
The other opposition parties continue their disappointment, who now seemingly even stopped talking about making such reforms a priority.
Excellent arrticle Nusrat sahib. And well done PTI. Lead the way!
MQM (Altaf Hussain) asked for amendments years ago
http://tribune.com.pk/story/127966/blasphemy-laws-mqm-will-protect-pakistan-from-religious-tyranny/
Javeed bhai good article as always, specially about problem of IK to carry both Taliban and liberals in Lahore and Karachi .what I can not understand your harsh attitude in your talk show. believe me most of the time I was agreed with you but at last I gave up to watch your talk show . As a democrat we should tolerant and good listener . Even it is the policy of program or producer instruction , it is not good . Your content always good I am just talking about presentation . Change gradually you will be more popular and effective .
@whats the big deal: "PPP, MQM & ANP have been saying this for years now."
If these parties thought that the blasphemy law should be reformed, they had the opportunity during 18th amendment passage to introduce necessary changes. They could also have wihtdrawn 2nd amendment which is used for oppressing Ahmadis. Again they did not.
Good show by PTI. But the problem is that PTI does not understand one thing, in order to pass new laws or make changes to the existing ones you need to do negotiation and get in touch with other parties. If PTI really wants to make a difference it has to cut the rhetorics and get down to work by engaging people that agree to the changes, even if it means working with PPP,MQM or ANP for the people.
Kudos to you sir, I appreciate your candid article and hope that others will follow the logic what Ms. Mazari and Mr.Hashmi is saying, they deserve our applause. Pakistanis may not realize it that what kind of damage General Zia and his cohorts with the help of the US and Saudi Arabia has done to the society of Pakistan. I grew up in Mardan in the early 60s and we were all friends regardless of who believed what. There was even a mosque of the Ahmedis in Mardan beside the Christian Churches and Hindu temple. Granted, you will find extremists in every religion but some how we have exceeded negatively the human capacity to be more accommodating and kind to others with different faiths.
We must give rights to minorities without a sword of blasphemy law hanging on their heads. And there should be a double punishment who tries to falsely accused non Muslims. They are loyal and proud Pakistanis and have to honour them.
@whats the big deal: When did BB become Rani ? And who is responsible for looting the country for past 5 years without any development being done ?
I am proud of Javed Hashmi and Dr. Shireen for speaking out against the law. God bless them!
@whats the big deal: PTI lost an MPA within the first 3 months of their government. Lets stop with this sympathy politics and discuss policies on merit rather than emotion.
So when a good thing comes up it becomes Javed Hashmi and not PTI. Great. So journalists in Pakistan can twist news in whatever way they want.
in this land of pure, its hard to "discuss" blasphemy law, if someone does, he must be appreciated! Thanks Hashmi sb.
PTI is in the process of evolution. This is the only party that revisits its stances, opinions and views after healthy and dispassionate discourse within the party. I have no doubts that PTI is going to wade through these ugly times and will emerge as a vibrant and dynamic party. The only thing that they need to do right now is to have a thought provoking and deep analysis of their stance on militancy.
PPP, MQM & ANP have been saying this for years now. They are the only parties willing to give minorities a chance in Pakistan, a chance promised by M.A. Jinnah. As a result these parties were targeted viciously during election campaign 2013 and lost several workers.
Due to a strong stance against extremism in the past PPP lost Shaheed Rani Mohatarma Benazir Bhutto & Salman Taseer, MQM lost 2 MPAs (Raza Haider & Sajid Qureshi - who was killed along with his son) and ANP also lost 1 MPA (Bashir Bilour).