When the ‘specialists’ are quizzed about the prevalence of terrorism and its deadly ideology in Pakistan, they often say, “But the majority, the ‘silent majority’ rejects them”. But the real news is that this ‘silent majority’ is dead. For a long time, the term ‘silent majority’ referred to the dead rather than the living. It was only during the 1970’s with Nixon’s Watergate scandal that he referred to the ‘silent majority’ which supported him — obviously they were dead too. Dead, too, is our population which opposes terrorism and its ideology. Our collective apathy speaks louder than our words and actions. This menace has killed scores of our military men and civilians in recent months, let alone the last decade or so, and we still want to negotiate. We must be dead to think this.
One of the reasons why this menace is getting stronger and is perhaps, not going to leave us is because we have yet to take this menace seriously. Just imagine, a few weeks ago, the firings on the Line of Control created war hysteria against India, mainly at the behest of the media, but no such hype has ever been created against the Taliban. Since 1947, India has killed a fraction of the people the Taliban have killed in Pakistan, but we still consider India as our main enemy and react to them strongly. The Taliban have practically held the whole country hostage for over a decade and are the biggest threat to our lives, but we still have most of our military focused on the Indian border. So, if the Taliban were really accepted as the real enemy, we would treat them like one and show our commitment to wiping them out.
Among the reasons why we are lukewarm about the Taliban is because our country is becoming increasingly bigoted and intolerant. As a matter of fact, a large majority of our country is deeply prejudiced and fanatical. This change is not new. Religious fanaticism has been seen throughout the centuries — from the blood baths due to religion in early modern Europe, to the ‘communal riots’ in British India, nations have had to deal with fanaticism.
That is why one of the hallmarks of becoming modern was that people learnt not to kill just because of religion. The West took hundreds of years to internalise this and has hopefully achieved it to a large extent. South Asia, obviously, has yet to achieve this milestone. In fact, in Pakistan, we are fast going in the opposite direction. There are so many examples of our bigotry and intolerance that I simply do not know where to begin; we only tolerate intolerance is all I can say!
Several years ago, I was walking through old Peshawar and stumbled upon a beautiful white mosque which had Persian inscriptions on the outside. On closer examination I saw it was not a mosque, but a church, in the style of a mosque. The builders also chose to adorn it with Pashto and Persian verses on the outside, giving it a more localised exterior. I went round the church and marvelled at the construction since it so beautifully and skilfully linked Christianity to the area, and took away the foreign feeling we often have in churches in South Asia. It was poignant that terrorists attacked this church on Bloody Sunday. This church represented the welcome of the Pashtun culture to the Christian religion and the acceptance of local culture by the incoming mission — the terrorists clearly wanted to break this link.
In 1883, this church was dedicated to ‘All Saints’; now on this Bloody Sunday, this white-washed church has indeed been washed by the blood of these newly martyred saints.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 24th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@MQ:
"Newton, What did the worshippers last Sunday at All Saints Church have to do with the drones? Were they flying the drones? Were they even supporting drone strikes? What was their exact culpability vis-a-vis the drones, that they had to pay with their lives? Would be glad to hear your reasoning. May be I am missing something here."
You are confusing reason with justification - what I have provided in my original comment is the reason for the attack, namely that it is a reaction to actions that create militants. Justification will require more effort than I care to provide here - do a little research and you'll get that too.
Dude silent majority is killed in masjids, imambarghahs and has its cars windscreens shattered and wallets and valuables looted during the "protest" by christians. Get stuck in a traffic jam at eesa nagri and then we would ask you where is the silent majority
@Usman Waraich
Very well put. I like the reference to the width given to the different colours in the Indian flag. Very well observed.
The silent majority is doing a great disservice to Pakistan by not raising their voice and making themselves counted against the mayhem unleashed by TTP. Though there are still many apologists of this organisation which includes top politicians who still advocate talks, but mostly due to fear and the same has been conveyed by them both on Pakistan and Indian media which makes the situation more complicated. In such a scenario the majority has to rise to the grave situation and voice their opinion for a punitive action against these barbarians. The cowardly attack against Malala was a fit case for taking a decisive action when most political parties including the powerful establishment were on the same page but unfortunately PPP govt did not muster courage for the same. In the backdrop of this case, the present mayhem would soon be forgotten beyond condemnation and resolutions in NA, TTP barbarities would continue and more innocent lives shall be lost in the future as well.
This is true. Shahabuddin Ghauri, Aurangzeb, Muhammad-bin-Quasim, Mahmud Ghazni are heroes of Pakistan and not Badshah Khan, Abdus Salam.
Author is an historian. He must know that silent majority is also deeply ignorant because they have been fed lies in the form of distorted historical content regarding pre and post independence Pakistan. When your syllabus is radicalized and you teach children that Pakistan was created in the name of Islam and do not share with them Quaid's 11th September speech to the first constituent assembly and discuss the way forward, you are crafting blinkered mindset which is not all inclusive. Ever wondered why would he choose to give this speech to the "constituent assembly"... because that was the kind of vision he had for the constitution and the country. You need to start telling the truth in your classes and change the syllabi.
You need to highlight the contributions of the people in the white stripe of the flag as well and the people who you have tried to push from green into the white stripe....
Ever wondered why a large proportion of population did not buy in to the Pakistan for muslims argument. Over there in India they were also in the Green part of the flag (not white) and it was of same width as the saffron stripe... and two of them also got elected to highest state position of President as well What does the Pakistan constitution say ?.
I am an atheist and have found no need for religion at least for five decades after I became a teenager. May be, those who have a spiritual bent of mind need faith, whatever it is. But, I can certainly say, nobody needs "fanaticism". That is the poison that Pakistan seems right now to suffused with.
@Murad Malik: hahah - first sort out your mess - Dont worry about India , we can easily take care of you
Sir the people have never had a voice. Our rulers have only thought of themselves and their pockets and amongst them are those who arrogated unto themselves the responsibility to defending both our borders and our idealogy..........and have failed. Blaming the people is the easy way out.
This article would have been perfect until you brought the Indian side to it. made you sound like an Indian apologists here. Please lets just focus on TTP Barbarians and their Apologists. No need to go all idealistic right now, we cant afford such a fight right now under these circumstances.
@Newton: "It is disingenuous to talk about any reaction like this church bombing, and not talk about the actions that cause these reactions. When innocent god fearing tribal folk are attacked by drones or local us and Indian proxies in uniform, will they not retaliate? " Sure, every action has a reaction, but then why not to attack US and India (the real source of action-as per you) instead of killing hopelessly powerless folks. By the way , these Christians were also Pakistani's and not representatives of either US or India..........................why so much hate??????
@shahid: The sophisticated, democratic and socially responsible world has forgotten the apartheid regimes of Africa with countless stories of torture and killings. The stories of black Americans and Africans or not worth mentioning as these does not fit in to the scheme of things of today leading to the better future of humanity.
A Peshawary
@csmann: The silent majority does speak and it speaks through votes, what else is expected of them? Should they pick-up the guns or destroy the fabric of society in an other manner. Given a chance silent majority always make a prudent choice and deliver their verdict loud and clear. But the problem is with after election performance of elected ones. For example all the parties promised local bodies election which are still in-waiting. The local bodies are institutions that have direct and visible impact on the people's life.
Silent majority does not submit to tyranny or have dead conscious.The voice of the silent majority in all civilized societies is casting of vote, socially responsible media and civil society organizations. The later two institutions (perhaps either of the institutions are immature or have vested interest) are not performing up to the required international standards.
A Peshawary
A topical article in the Indian Express of 23 Septemeber ("Two nations and a divided family"), triggered by the Peshawar bombings, brings out the difference in the life of minorities in India and Pakistan.
I am not attempting to paint India in rosy colours. It has a lot of imperfections. But in an imperfect world the country is still an amazing melting pot - one that allows people who somehow find it difficult to live together in other parts of the world, to co-exist, even thrive.
It is probably too late for change. One can only wish for what could have been!
MQ
Newton,
What did the worshippers last Sunday at All Saints Church have to do with the drones?
Were they flying the drones? Were they even supporting drone strikes? What was their exact culpability vis-a-vis the drones, that they had to pay with their lives?
Would be glad to hear your reasoning. May be I am missing something here.
MQ
Well said. The silent majority is a chimera in the minds of those who would rather not see the how monstrous the soul of our potentially great nation has become.
@Newton: If you are man enough and have sauce in your balls, then petition your government to stop accepting financial assistance and aid from the Christian nations such as the US and the West. The Christian nations are pouring billions of dollars to Pakistan through various programmes for the past 60 years. Learn to stand on your own feet first instead of walking on crutches provided by the Christian nations. When there were floods in Pakistan, including KP, all of those who were affected by the floods willingly took the aid provided to them by these so-called infidels or kafirs. Why you guys didn't reject it then? As for the drones, ask Gen. Musharraf about it. There is an official agreement signed by Pakistan and the US on the use of Pakistan territory, including aerial attacks, to deal with terrorists. Do you think, the US would have violated the sovereignty of Pakistan without such a deal? A simple question, can anyone enter your house without your permission?
Having internalized all that the author tells us about, they decided to go ahead and attack Afghanistan - first Russians then the US - and slaughter tens of thousands of people with millions still living as refugees in the neighboring countries. Then they decided to attack Iraq after brazenly lying to the world about WMD's and in fact the slaughter there has not yet ended. Let us not even talk about Palestine/Israel conflict. Egypt's western supported over throw of a democratically elected government - 2013 - and a military coup are still progressing with a couple of thousand dead already under its belt. A little earlier we had the two decades long war in Vietnam with millions killed and injured. The slaughter in south and central America has only recently come to an end. The unrestrained use of poison gas against the Kurds during the eighties by Saddam Hussain and against the Iranians with the active support of the western powers is thoroughly documented in the public media. Let us not even look at the details of the two world wars and the use of atomic bombs against civilians in Japan and the relentless bombing of Dresden in Germany. Need one say more?
Unfortunately violence is a part of human psyche and is not limited to or restricted to a specific people of society. This is in the nature of the beast and to ascribe it only to a particular group is superficial at best.
Aurangzeb, Ghori Mohamed are all your heroes. Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad were sworn enemies of Pakistan. What kind of country do you expect?
Didn't this author write a column some time ago "this IS jinnah's Pakistan "???
You are right; we are everything but a nation. The social polarization and wrong understanding of Islamic teachings has compelled us to the present mess. I hate to sound pessimistic but I do not see any guts in present political and religious leadership to tackle this issue effectively. Their attitude is typical phrase from Nawab’s of Lukhnow, “Ib ke maar ke daikh”.
Silent majority is silent killer
It is disingenuous to talk about any reaction like this church bombing, and not talk about the actions that cause these reactions. When innocent god fearing tribal folk are attacked by drones or local us and Indian proxies in uniform, will they not retaliate? Perhaps the author expects Muslims to die like good little mute sacrificial lambs to suit imperialistic designs and not react. However nature tells us every action must have a reaction
If you don't condemn and fight against the tyranny,you are part of oppressors.Silent Majority is even more dangerous than a vocal minority.It tacitly belies the acceptance of the tyranny,and the violent minority portrays this as an acceptance of their agenda.And they are right in doing so. How else could Mullahs and other bigots declare openly hounding,and killing of Ahmadis, destroying their property,and excommunicating them out of Pakistan.without the fear of a consequence.A dead conscience is worse than dead body.And Pakistan has lost its conscience.
Beg to differ. IT is not apathy but complicity when the police of a country go and destroy a place of worship. http://tribune.com.pk/story/607912/ahmadi-persecution-police-bow-to-clerics-to-tear-down-minarets/
IT should be noted that this happened not in FATA but in Sialkot. Have not heard a word of condemnation by any political leader.
Well said.
'The silent majority are against extremists' excuse has become redundant. It got best exposed from the overall reactions after Salman Taseer's assassination, who supported the murderer, best captured by the rose petal throwing lawyers.