Indian cricketer Sreesanth banned for life on spot-fixing charges

Sreesanth, who has played 27 tests, was arrested in May by Delhi police.


Afp/reuters September 13, 2013
Former Test bowler S. Sreesanth. PHOTO: AFP

MUMBAI: Former India fast bowler Shanthakumaran Sreesanth has been banned for life on spot-fixing charges, the country's cricket board (BCCI) said on Friday.

"S Sreesanth is banned for life from playing any representative cricket, or in any way being associated with the activities of the BCCI or its affiliates," the BCCI said in a statement after its disciplinary committee meeting in Delhi.

Sreesanth, who has played 27 tests, and two other players were arrested in May by Delhi police on suspicion of spot-fixing in the Indian Premier League.

Ankeet Chavan, Sreesanth's team mate in IPL franchise the Rajasthan Royals, was also banned for life. Domestic Indian cricketers Amit Singh and Siddharth Trivedi have been banned for five years and one year respectively, the board added.

The fourth player, Amit Singh, who played in the IPL till last year, was seen as the conduit between the cricketers and bookies, and described by Sawani as "the bad fish that spoils the entire pond".

All four players belong to the Rajasthan Royals franchise, but Sreesanth, 30, is the only one to have played for India. He was part of the teams that won the World Twenty20 in 2007 and the World Cup in 2011.

Gambling is mostly illegal in India, but betting on cricket matches thrives through networks of underground bookies.  Spot-fixing, in which a specific part of a game, but not the result, is fixed, is also illegal.

COMMENTS (12)

ufaquarian | 10 years ago | Reply

@sid : He was mediocore at his best , even Ishant Sharma would be better rated versus him. One or two performance dont define great bowlers if that would be the case then Rana Naveed , Sami on their best days would be labelled as Test great bowlers.

Anand | 10 years ago | Reply

@Water Bottle “Sreesanth should be banned from TV appearances in such lewd shows as bigboss and lifetime ban on his dancing.”

I’m a bit surprised, coming as it is, from someone whose comments are mostly quite perceptive and less jingoistic, or xenophobic. Sreesanth has commited an offence for which he has been tried and the punishment has been handed. One can argue about the quantum of punishment, fair enough. But what it has got to do with his right to earn a living? Dispensing justice is not the same thing as extracting revenge.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ