Making parliamentary history: Legal threat looms over govt

Published: September 4, 2013
Email
On Tuesday, Chief Minister (CM) Pervez Khattak had appointed two special assistants and 32 MPAs as parliamentary secretaries. PHOTO: PPI

On Tuesday, Chief Minister (CM) Pervez Khattak had appointed two special assistants and 32 MPAs as parliamentary secretaries. PHOTO: PPI

PESHAWAR: 

The Awami National Party (ANP) has submitted an adjournment motion against the provincial government for inducting 32 new parliamentary secretaries. By virtue of this move, all Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MPAs now have a government position.

On Tuesday, Chief Minister (CM) Pervez Khattak appointed two special assistants and 32 MPAs as parliamentary secretaries, insisting they were only there to “represent different government departments in case of absence of concerned ministers during assembly sessions.”

“The provincial government has violated the Constitution by inducting these secretaries. Under the 18th Amendment, the cabinet cannot exceed 11% of the total count of the house,” said ANP parliamentary leader Sardar Hussain Babak. He was addressing the media after submitting the adjournment motion at the K-P Assembly Secretariat on Wednesday.

The government, however, insists that the parliamentary secretaries are not part of the cabinet and that the decision comes under the CM’s ambit.

Babak alleged the provincial government has taken to adjusting its strength through backdoor channels as the Constitution does not allow for “an army of ministers, special advisors and parliamentary secretaries.”

The ANP will soon approach the Peshawar High Court against the provincial government’s decision, stated the ANP leader.

Lawyers too, have decided to challenge the government’s decision. “The PTI-led government’s decision is in violation of the Constitution and we will challenge this in court,” said lawyer Latif Afridi.

Besides the 32 parliamentary secretaries, the government also had 24 District Development Committee chairmen, seven special assistants, six advisors to the chief minister, two senior ministers, one speaker and one deputy speaker.

There were rumours that the PTI government may be toppled down. Qaumi Watan Party, who is a coalition partner of the PML-N at the centre, was allegedly trying to oust the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government with the help of Maulana Fazal Rehman’s Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam.  PTI chief Imran Khan had also said the government could dissolve if pushed to the wall.

PTI MPAs who were not given a government position intended to make a forward bloc in the assembly. There were rumours that these MPAs would bring about a no-confidence motion in the assembly against their own chief minister and topple the government.

It was after these rumours surfaced that the CM announced to appoint the parliamentary secretaries. These secretaries will have the authority to both assist and interfere in the ministries’ affairs.

PTI MPA and newly-inducted parliamentary secretary Mohammad Arif defended his party’s move. “Every MPA who is elected by the people is expected by the voters to work for them. If he is neglected by his own government then he will be unhappy and this is why the PTI has taken a bold step and appointed 32 parliamentary secretaries. This way an MPA will be able to meet the expectations of the voters.”

Published in The Express Tribune, September 5th, 2013.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • MAD
    Sep 5, 2013 - 9:41AM

    The sad part is that most of the MPAs forming a forward bloc were old members rather than electables. It seems the ideology never really made an impact on them. end goal was power, power and more power. Imran Khan may actually do justice by dissolving government here. It is better to lose than be blackmailed by political non-entities

    Recommend

  • Reply
    Sep 5, 2013 - 4:22PM

    PTI Central Secretary Information, Shireen Mazari, today stated that the noise being created over the appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa was totally without any basis. She pointed to the following facts:

    1) These Parliamentary Secretaries will not be getting any financial benefits/salaries normally earmarked for these positions,from the public exchequer so it will not cost the government anything. They will only be receiving their MPA salaries.

    2) The appointments have been made to allow MPAs to develop expertise in the various ministries and their work, so as to better be able to serve the public and understand governance more holistically.

    3) Through these appointments, the elected representatives can also act as informed MPAs holding the bureaucrats and ministers accountable effectively.

    It is unfortunate that before seeking an explanation or examining the issue, some people in the media criticised the KP government. In fact, these appointments add no financial burden on the public exchequer but give shape to the true notion of public service by the elected representativesRecommend

  • ET post this
    Sep 5, 2013 - 4:23PM

    PTI Central Secretary Information, Shireen Mazari,today stated that the noise being created over the appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa was totally without any basis. She pointed to the following facts:

    1) These Parliamentary Secretaries will not be getting any financial benefits/salaries normally earmarked for these positions,from the public exchequer so it will not cost the government anything. They will only be receiving their MPA salaries.

    2) The appointments have been made to allow MPAs to develop expertise in the various ministries and their work, so as to better be able to serve the public and understand governance more holistically.

    3) Through these appointments, the elected representatives can also act as informed MPAs holding the bureaucrats and ministers accountable effectively.

    It is unfortunate that before seeking an explanation or examining the issue, some people in the media criticised the KP government. In fact, these appointments add no financial burden on the public exchequer but give shape to the true notion of public service by the elected representatives.Recommend

  • Khan
    Sep 5, 2013 - 9:43PM

    ” 2) The appointments have been made to allow MPAs to develop expertise in the various ministries and their work, so as to better be able to serve the public and understand governance more holistically.

    3) Through these appointments, the elected representatives can also act as informed MPAs holding the bureaucrats and ministers accountable effectively.”

    So changing the name from MPA to Secretary means the member becomes an “informed MPA”?

    If they are to remain the same what good would a change in name do?

    Wait … did I say Change? — Well, this might just be the change IK was talking about!

    Recommend

  • Riaz Siddhu
    Sep 12, 2013 - 10:56PM

    Naya Pakistan – Old wine in new bottle

    Recommend

More in K-P