Here is a person who had made a commitment to serve his country and was put in the difficult situation of deciding whether to follow protocol and turn a blind eye to abuses and war crimes carried out in his country’s name or to do the morally right thing and bring atrocities to light.
Bradley Manning chose to follow his conscience, knowing full well the consequences of going against the military machine and political landscape.
He decided that when he took oath, it wasn’t to serve his superiors in the army or the politicians in Washington, but his fellow countrymen who deserved to know that they were being misled and lied to. This is why he allegedly leaked classified documents to WikiLeaks that lifted the veil of secrecy on US foreign policy for the entire world to see, revealing the true nature of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Rather than being appreciative of his sacrifices, he has become a pariah in the eyes of a large segment of the US population.
Similarly, Edward Snowden, who had to leave the US in order to bring to people’s attention that their privacy was being violated indiscriminately by their own government, has also been castigated.
It is disconcerting to see how far the government has succeeded in brainwashing the masses to letting slide almost anything under the guise of national security. In fact, after its treatment of whistleblowers and prisoners of war, it would be highly impudent and hypocritical of the US to lecture any country about its human rights record ever again. This whole scenario is Orwellian in nature, evoking memories of 1984, which should be made mandatory reading for all young adults.
It seemed that rather than learning a lesson from the run-up to the Iraq war, where media organisations seemed to be acting solely as mouthpieces of the US government, instead of actively investigating its claims, the local media in the US once again seems to be repeating that very misstep. Most of the local American media has been outright hostile to Snowden and Manning.
From Joe Scarborough claiming Snowden looks like a weasel and asking his face be covered up, to David Gregory attacking a fellow journalist, asking Glen Greenwald on live television why he shouldn’t be charged with a crime for “aiding and abetting” Snowden, it seems as if the US media was engaged in their ‘Two Minutes Hate’ against the current Goldstein.
Despite the harsh treatment and all the hatred directed towards those who have done so before them, there will always be people who will try to expose evil and bring attention to the truth.
Bradley Manning sacrificed everything in order to bring to the people the truth, and that selfless action transcends all borders, nationalities and religions.
For this very reason, I am Bradley Manning, and you should be too.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 21st, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Tania Takiariam: That sort of humour only appeals to the lowest common denominator.
Bradley Manning: I want to live as a woman named Chelsea Mani Khawaja: I am Bradley Manning I want to live as a woman named.........
Once again, would the author think that a Pakistani who released all the Pakistani government and military secret documents and correspondence over the years should also be considered a "Hero"???
@Kashmiri-American: completely agree with your point. My comment was mostly addressed to Strategic Asset's comment in regards to whistle blowing in Pakistan
@mani k: Why drag Pakistan into this?Just because the writer is a Pakistani that doesn't mean you have to drag Pakistan into every issue.
@John B: so the video where us fighter pilots killed a civilian news crew and made jokes, the video that disturbed Bradley, was within the confines of us ethics and laws? You must be joking or ill informed!
Manning is a misguided youth who leaked /released information which did not violate any ethics or US constitution.
Snowden on the other hand acted within the human ethical limits and within the US constitutional window. Snowden action is akin to Pentagon papers of Vietnam era.
It is shame that Manning is a hero and not the Snowden to the author.
What truth or unethical information came out from Manning other than the gossip?
All governments operate on the fringes of human ethics and constitutional rights. What manning did is unwarranted gossip and had no human value whereas what Snowden did has universal ethical and constitutional values beyond the US borders.
Everyone knew that the US is monitoring the communication but under what authority and whose supervision are the issues for the US public and it is of no concern of others.
In any case, both manning and snowden issues are for the US people to decide. None of their work has any international political value. Let us be clear on this distinction.
The difference between Pakistan and the United States is that one is a firmly established self proclaimed bastion of democracy and freedom of speech and transparency, while the other has been teetering on the brink for a while now having been plundered by corrupt politicians and military dictators. So pardon me for having higher expectations from the US. I would like whistleblowers who are highlighting the wrongs of their respective countries to be given blanket immunity and commendations, regardless of the fact that they are Pakistani or American. The term I am Manning Bradley is meant to show solidarity with him, not an attempt to make a martyr of myself, for Bradley has shown himself to be a far braver man than most of us.
@Indian Wisdom: "So we can expect some explosive secrets and classified documents of Pakistan military getting leaked by Mr. Mani Khawaja, that would lift the veil for the entire world to see, revealing the true nature of the wars in Kashmir and Afghanistan"
You can't really expect Mani Khwaja to do what Bradley Manning did, because Bradley Manning worked for the U.S military and Edward Snowden worked for the NSA, whereas this writer is not connected to the Pakistani military/intelligentsia.
Only an Insider can expose them
If you are Bradley Manning, I would expect you to make some revelations and to bear the punishment for breaking the law. . Unfortunately, you are just another Pakistani whose only sympathy towards Bradley Manning derives from the convoluted relationship of your country towards America. In a democracy, citizens are expected to be critical of their government and whistle-blowing is a natural tendency arising from it. Please reflect that how is it in Pakistan, we hear people critical of their government and yet there are no whistle-blowers? The closest whistle-blower I have come across yet was Salman Shahzad yet he paid the penalty with torture before death, a far cry from Bradley Manning. . Please bear in mind that I went through Wikileaks and it gave me a lot of insight on the US, India and Pakistan relationship. I thank Bradley Manning for this information. However, the fact also is that he broke the law and must face the penalty. I would hope the judge would be lenient or he would be given early parole. But to not penalize him at all would not be right. This is the same as what many people posted in the US after Edward Snowden's escape.
It just worries me that despite articles like this, people dont realise the severity of the situation.
@Mani Khawaja, That's very moral and idealistic of you to say. But can say, "I am Dr. Shakeel Afridi" in the same tone?!
Comments are more interesting here.
"I am Bradley Manning"
So we can expect some explosive secrets and classified documents of Pakistan military getting leaked by Mr. Mani Khawaja, that would lift the veil for the entire world to see, revealing the true nature of the wars in Kashmir and Afghanistan................
Hi Tom, when this article was written and submitted a few weeks ago (as can be gauged by the opening paragraph) the possible sentence of 136 years accurately reflects the fact as at the time. whether it is 136 years, 90 years or even the 60 years that the prosecution are asking for, it does not change the fact that he will essentially be spending life in prison. And yes, while there might be Americans like you who support manning, there is a very significant if not larger segment of the population that does not. You can obviously verify these facts through a search engine of your choice
People like Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, Amber Lyon, Julian Assange, David Miranda etc `are the heroes of humanity. We place them in highest of respects just like our heroes; Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Martyr Mustafa Chamran, Imad Moghnia, Martyr Sibte Jaffar etc. All of them stand against tyranny and bravely exposed themselves to the tyrants of this era.
@Tom: Before going nuts:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10212583/Bradley-Manning-faces-136-year-jail-sentence-for-leaking-files.html
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/06/bradley-manning-sentence-reduced-90-years
Way to distract from your country's abysmal treatment of whistle blowers by attacking the author.
@Tom: Quite an angry rant there Tom. Looks like the article hit a nerve.
Oh, how pathetic! You don't like to be undermined. Your facts about the sentencing are wrong too. If you can't state facts you shouldn't be writing bogus material. This makes you no better than the American government & the NSA! Quite your job.
Hold on! We, the citizens of America, praise Bradly Manning for his honesty & integrity. He is a hero to the American people. The government is a shameful representative of this country. Many Americans have signed a petition, willing to serve part of his sentence in respect of Broadly Manning: http://rt.com/usa/manning-petition-serve-term-011/#=