NA-48 by-election: Anjum Aqeel withdraws nomination papers

On Wednesday, the ECP had allowed Khan to contest the NA-48 by-elections.


Our Correspondent August 15, 2013
Khan appeared before the returning officer on Thursday and withdrew his nomination papers, citing that the PML-N had not awarded him a ticket and he respected the party’s decision. PHOTO: INP/FILE

ISLAMABAD:


The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) candidate for the NA-48 by-election Anjum Aqeel Khan has officially withdrawn his nomination papers.


Khan appeared before the returning officer on Thursday and withdrew his nomination papers, citing that the PML-N had not awarded him a ticket and he respected the party’s decision.

On Wednesday, the Election Commission of Pakistan had allowed Khan to contest the NA-48 by-elections after a petition seeking the restoration of his nomination papers was accepted.

Later, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif  asked Khan to withdraw his papers in light of the controversy surrounding the party’s ticket, which had already been awarded to Advocate Ashraf Gujjar.

The three major-party candidates contesting the by-elections are Gujjar, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s Asad Umar and Pakistan People’s Party’s Faisal Sakhi Butt.

The seat was vacated by PTI’s Javed Hashmi after retaining his home constituency seat.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2013.

COMMENTS (5)

Jibran | 10 years ago | Reply

The two members of election commission who allowed allowed him to contest after withdrawing his papers the first time should be ashamed of their actions, issue a public apology, and then resign from their positions for bringing disrespect to their institution by their actions.

J Kay | 10 years ago | Reply @A. Khan: Agreed. This, along with nominations of reserved seats for women and minorities, should be done away with. All seats should be equally contested through polls, and only one constituency per politician should be allowed.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ