Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry took a suo motu notice on the contents of a television show that aired the attack on Quaid-e-Azam’s Ziarat Residency, on Tuesday, stating that it was a violation of the provisions of the Constitution.
The telecast had shown video footage of the attack, refuting claims by security agencies that the rockets had been fired by terrorists from outside. Contrary to these claims, the video revealed that the residency was blown up by terrorists from within, as militants were seen carrying gas cylinders inside.
Furthermore the anchor of the show, had said that the militants had entered the venue after killing two security guards and numbered 5 to 6 militants who were wearing masks and were equipped with latest weaponry.
The host also revealed that the attackers collected all photographs and articles at one place before burning them.
The disturbing images in the broadcast showed militants lowering the national flag, tearing it and raising the flag of Balochistan Libration Army (BLA), before blowing up the residency with explosives.
Taking up the case, the Supreme Court said that “such material seems an infringement of the provisions of the Constitution.”The chief justice has summoned the chief executive officer of the television channel, chairman Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), the attorney general and Balochistan advocate general on August 15.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2013.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Why kill the messenger? Take notice of the perpetrators BLA. Take security agencies to task. Taking notice of the report is ridiculous.
Why is he not taking the Sumo Motto Notice on the attack it self????
ETBLOGS1987
Truth is an infringement of the constitution? Wow just wow.
Mind you destruction of a national heritage monument is immensely regrettable but given that it has happened, don't the people have a right to know how it happened instead of deliberately being lied to? Who is the CJ trying to protect?
Freedom of speech being blown to bits.... For God's sake, it was not the TV channel that did the attack, they were just trying to highlight the heinous nature of the crime, not applaud it.