This book was Al Ghazali’s Ninety-nine Beautiful Names of God. I was surprised to realise that I held it with an odd excitement, even though I was only dimly aware of the identity, or indeed, the pre-eminence of Al Ghazali, and also had no real understanding of what he could have written about the 99 names. It was only after I had read the book that I realised that these names that I had believed only to be descriptions of a few of the many attributes of Allah, to be recited as a form of prayer, were in fact, guiding lights for the development of the human character, and, therefore, not merely to be recited, but to be understood, imbibed and lived.
Reading this book marked the beginning of a journey: outwardly, it was a journey in search of Al Ghazali, the man, the scholar, the Sufi, but inwardly, it was a journey of the soul. The more I discovered about Al Ghazali’s life, the more I felt drawn to his writings. Sadly, however, his writings remained difficult to find in Pakistan. But whenever I did find something, I realised that it was Al Ghazali, who, with his measured, rational and practical expositions of faith, had the power to touch my soul most deeply. And so, it was that over time, I came to look upon Al Ghazali as a mentor and a guide. The only difficulty was that my guide had been dead for nearly 900 years!
Al Ghazali (or Algazel, as he is known in the West) was born in 1058 in Tus in modern Iran. As a young man, he became a distinguished professor of Fiqh and was bestowed with titles such as ‘Brilliance of the Religion’ and ‘Eminence among the Religious Leaders’. Destiny, however, had other plans for him. As he neared the magical age of 40, he underwent a spiritual crisis, which has been described as a “violent internal conflict between rational intelligence and the spirit, between the world and the hereafter”. So terrible was his anguish that he became physically ill and could neither speak nor teach. When he finally recovered, he renounced his post, wealth, fame and influence and took up the life of an ascetic.
Although the second part of his career was cut short by his death in 1111 at the age of 53, it was for this that he attained immortality. He left behind almost 400 works, the most famous being his Revival of the Religious Sciences. His most important principle, perhaps, was the emphasis on knowledge and awareness rather than blind faith. In his view, only a disciplined and educated seeker could attain knowledge of the divine, and through it, true happiness. For Al Ghazali, seeking of knowledge was itself the highest form of worship — a concept that appears to have become alien to the present-day proponents of combative Islam.
Many years after my first encounter with Al Ghazali, I found him in London again. I am now reading, On Meditation, and am surprised at the mastery with which he rivals the most modern of psychologists: believe (he says) that, everything happens for a reason, there is no such thing as failure — only outcomes, take responsibility for whatever happens, learn from others, believe in excellence and know that there is no success without commitment. I read his words carefully, so that I come to know them not through the intellect, but through the true seat of learning, the heart.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 7th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Anand
My guess is it is not. But then who knows, when He knows the best!!!
Is the word 'Ghazi' rooted in Ghazali? Just qurious.
@Dee Cee: You have rightly pointed out. Deciding that there are no natural laws puts brakes on empirical inquiry and rational thinking.
Dee Cee ' s comment is correct , reason and logic has no place in the " philosophy " of Imam Ghazali. He was a theologian who firmly believed that nothing would happen unless willed by God and the famous example given by him is that of cotton ball that would not catch fire even if it is put to match . He did not believe in cause and effect and either .. Rebuttal of Ghazali ' s seminal work namely Tahafut Al Falasfa by Averroes the great Andalusian Arab philosopher did not catch Muslim imagination .
A European translator of Tahafut Al Tahafut ( incoherence of Incoherence ) described Ghazali " Ghazali is a Mumin , that is a believer , he is Muslim ,that is he accepts : his heart submits to a truth his reason can not establish , for his heart has reasons his reason does not know ." Ghazali ' s philosophy is theology of heart and not intellect .
For those of you who have raised concerns about Al-Ghazali, here is a video of a talk by Hamza Yusuf that explains it better than I can http://vimeo.com/34401389
@M: "All you brilliant, learned people on this forum...... You should be the ones coming on our television sets, not men who give away babies live on TV.... We need critical thought, now more than ever......." . Except PTV all other channels have one and only one interest. Money making. Something devised on the pattern of PBS (Public Broadcasting System, USA) can serve as a model. That would require dedicated effort by folk from the Ministry of Education, to make space available devoted specifically for serious discourse. . There is no dearth of learned people who can gladly partake in such programmes and take up worthy topics for discussion instead of the idiots who monopolise the media today churning out total garbage, day in and day out..
Although an outsider to the religion, I am trying to learn the basics of the various philosophical ideas in Islam. Al Ghazali's famous sublimation of ALL causes to God is seen as closing the door on understanding causation and, by extension, rational inquiry. If God is the known cause of all events (as in cotton is not burnt by fire, but it is burnt by God), there is no need to evaluate any other causal relationships. But, as aptly put by @Student, it is too much to put all blame on one person.
@faraz: Complete ban on greek philosophy ? Ghazali uses Greek philosophy in his arguments! read his book Faysal- al-tafrika. You can get a good english translation of it.
np, can you prove that the sun rises in the East? Have you read the Origin of Species, the original edition, before it was purged on the orders of the Christian church? Have you read the the Imam and Proof of Islam and the Incoherence of Philosophers? Even Newton has acknowledged the absolute mastery of Imam Ghazali on the intricacies of scientific method and process of scientific discovery and refutation.
Imam Ghazali and Maulana Rumi two great scholars and Sufis.
@Noor Nabi: Damn right! This is who she is talking about and sadly with such reverance that it supercedes even The most revered, she seems to be almost worshipping him which obviously is the norm & the rule here, individuals first and the last and in between.
@kaalchakra: "Galileo and Darwin came upon many of their most important ideas after studying Ghazali’s works. Please give credit where it is fully due. "
Please provide verifiable reference.
The title he was known for was 'Hujjat-ul-Islam" i.e. "Proof of Islam" meaning the proof that Islam is the true religion.
very beautifully written. i felt as i was reading Ghazali myself.well done mis amber
I am pleased at the comments, there are so many people in Pakistan who read serious books and indulge in intellectual discourse. May this trend catch further wave.
Read your own self, you will get to the soul.
nice read.
All you brilliant, learned people on this forum. Where are you? You should be the teachers and lecturers in our colleges. You should be the ones coming on our television sets, not men who give away babies live on TV. It has been a joy reading your opinions on the matter and I just wish that you could all impart all that you know to the youth of this beautiful country of ours. We need critical thought, now more than ever. Thank you author and thank you commentators.
It is as wrong to say that Ghazali hurt reason as it is to claim that Islam hurt science. Ghazali transcended reason to provide a basis of super-reason, just as Islam had transcended all science to built the foundations of a global super-science. Popper was a student of Ghazali, Galileo and Darwin came upon many of their most important ideas after studying Ghazali's works. Please give credit where it is fully due.
@Khalai Lota: Came to say this. Ghazali had a purely negative impact on Science and learning within the muslim community. He had a towering personality, and that contributed to the overarching effects of his thinking on muslims today. This has been discussed in detail in 'The closing of the Muslim mind' by Robert Reilly.
I agree with @ Khalai that Ghazali is one of reason for downfall of Muslim intellectual journey. As he decreed fatwas and useless statements againts Muslim scientists and philosophers, like Ibn Sina and others who used reasoning and rational thoughts to understand religion.
Ghazali is good figure, who look religion through orthodox style and religion stays around "99" names or few fundamental things...
here is a good article, author may like to read about Ghazali's contribution to reverse the intellectual journey of Muslim world.....Muslim world needs to revive its philosophical journey, rather than Ghazali's advocacy, we already see extreme elements in our society..
http://www.academia.edu/4121989/TheNeedtoReviveIslamic_Philosophy
Ghazali, singlehandedly, did more damage to the progressive trends in Islam than anything else. His war on reason and the crusade against the Mu'tazila essentially eliminated reason from religion. The 'bila kaif' (don't ask how) slogan that his school preached for all religious edicts, was the final blow to the thinkers within the religious scholars.
@Sa It's sad that his take on greek rationalism closed the door on rational thought (which isn't really true). But apart from its political ramification, Algazel did destroy greek rationalism as a philosophical discourse, and his works have been read and reread and critiqued a thousand times by western philosophers who mostly end up agreeing with Algazel. Even today, a new philosophical discourse is taking place in the west which is exploring the flaws in greek rationalism based on ghazalli's works. Popper and Taleb are the latest edition of philosophers who have been exploring his ideas.
Ghazali is the chief architect of the decline of Muslim science. He declared that Ibn Sina and Al Farabi are heretics. His shut down the doors of ijtehad, and his fatwas led to complete ban on Greek philosophy. Which Ghazali are you talking about
The idea that Ghazali's critique closed the doors of innovation in Islam has been criticized and discarded within the academic field of Islamic studies over the past decade or two. You can read any of the new work that has come out to refer to this. Also, his refutation of philosophy and philosophers was not complete in its scope, he criticized them selectively and for specific reasons and in the same breath affirmed certain aspects and roles of philosophy. Also, it's kind of a bit much to put the responsibility for the end of innovation in religion on the shoulders of one man. What would everyone else have to be doing for that to be possible? Ibn Rushd, Ibn Taymiyya, the Illuminationist School of Philosophy, etc., all happened after that. And later Islamic theology also absorbed many aspects of the philosophical tradition. These issues are complicated and we need more than pedestrian knowledge when speaking about them on such a forum,
Feels more like a breath of fresh air. Thank you, Ms. Amber!
Is the author talking about the same Ghazali who hammered permanent bolts into the door of "Ijtehad" that has, unfortunately opened the doors of intolerance and terrorism?
Beautifully written. His eminent contribution lies in reconciling sufism and Muslim orthodoxy. However, his refutation of philosophy and philosophers in 'Incoherence of Philosophers' closed the doors of innovation in Islam. What is your take on it?