![the writer is a lawyer based in lahore and studied law at lincoln s inn and the london school of economics he tweets asadrahim the writer is a lawyer based in lahore and studied law at lincoln s inn and the london school of economics he tweets asadrahim](https://i.tribune.com.pk/media/images/586794-AsadRahimKhanNewagainagain-1375720050/586794-AsadRahimKhanNewagainagain-1375720050.jpg)
Granted, not the easiest of tasks — a Times of India report already blathered how Mr Kerry’s rescheduling was prompted by those Pakistanis ‘spitefully’ leaking details of his visit beforehand. In the Times’s defence, it was always better at using adverbs than reporting with substance. But despite our sly motives, Mr. Kerry somehow managed to make it to our part of the world … only to dash whatever hopes we had in person. Not that the broader trend suggested otherwise.
Year five into Obama’s sad little term, and the president has yet to visit this loyal republic of ours, besides that one trip in ’81 he refuses to talk about anymore. Visits from Air Force One have been getting rarer anyway, and we might just be blessed for it. When George Bush did swagger in some years ago, Islamabad went into lockdown, forcing General Musharraf to the edge. Fresh from clinching a nuclear deal with Delhi, Bush mumbled his way out of anything similar for us, baseball-pitched cricket balls at kids, and tiptoed out (a teensy improvement on Bill Clinton, who refused to be photographed with the general).
Gone, it seems, are the days Lyndon Johnson would throw himself into random crowds at Karachi Airport, giving out pens, hugs and handshakes as if he were back in the Deep South. Today’s Pakistan makes do with being vital enough to merit multiple visits from the Secretary of State, just not respectable enough for any by the president. Part of this is down to the smoldering volcano next door: Afghanistan and the masochists destined to sink in it till the end of time.
The other part is about as subtle: the Obama Administration’s plainly obvious contempt for Pakistan. The Abbottabad Commission Report redefines ‘intelligence failure’, while the 24 soldiers killed at Salala wounded the Pakistani consciousness forever. But as former ambassador Cameron Munter’s soul-baring makes clear, the Urdu press was actually right. Washington has squeezed and strong-armed Pakistan with awesome stupidity, against the better judgment of diplomats like Munter. “When I get calls from the White House, they say, ‘Dial up the pain,’” he said. “In Islamabad, they don’t respond well to dialling up the pain.”
In one sickening incident, Munter tried to stop then-CIA director Leon Panetta ordering a strike into North Waziristan in 2011. “It was in retaliation for Davis”, one Munter aide told the Associated Press. Angered by the imprisonment of Raymond Davis, the thug who gunned down two citizens in the streets of Lahore, Panetta dismissed Munter’s request. The strike went ahead. Ten reported militants were killed, and 19 more civilians with them. By the time the strikes slammed into innocent people, Davis was safely back home, in no small part to the efforts of Senator John Kerry.
The now-Secretary Kerry returns once more for that bit of journalese that never quite happens: ‘to smooth ties’ with Islamabad. And so Mr Kerry, a gentleman best-known back home as an also-ran, was attended by our foreign affairs adviser, prime minister, president and army chief. He declared drones would end “very, very soon”, and was rebuffed by a prissy press release by the State Department moments later. Not done yet, Mr Kerry fudged the US position on Egypt as well, appearing a tad too enthusiastic about the generals hauling the Brotherhood away.
And there lies the problem with the Kerry-as-game-changer theory: he’s not that great a diplomat. Unlike hard-nosed Richard Holbrooke types, Mr Kerry is a throwback to a Brylcreemed White America. Also unlike Holbrooke, he lacks the imagination to think out-of-the-box for a place as hard as this. Making matters worse is that the policy he’s dispensing is ill-considered to begin with. And as a mover of men, Mr Kerry was drab enough to have lost the White House to George Bush and, unlike with most of Junior’s fights, without Bush cheating. He is a walking fossil among the Democrats: another rich WASP with big hair and bad ties.
And yet an American personnel change, one that may empathise with Pakistani interests, is wishful thinking. For the time being, Washington has toned down its rhetoric, and the opportunity is meant to be seized. The new government’s harder stance on drones has yielded returns, helped by America’s crawling out of Afghanistan. As drones taper off, the PML-N and the PTI, though seldom praised in the same sentence, deserve nothing less.
Imran Khan has cried himself hoarse over drones at every forum, and his protest march to Waziristan was big, brave and risky. Towards the centre, Nawaz Sharif has come down on drone strikes with the weight of a man with a hundred-plus seats in parliament. Since May’s election, firing into the tribal areas has gotten all that much harder. Without the army’s silence, it could have grown all but impossible. In any event, it’s an improvement from the days of craven old People’s Party. But precisely because of those days, there’s a long way to go before Islamabad’s outrage can be deemed authentic.
And besides drones, Pakistan must bury the term ‘Af-Pak’, re-engaging with the world in a way that shreds the hyphen once and for all. That means a fresh charm offensive (and yes, a fully functional foreign minister please). Recalling his last National Security Council meeting, Munter confessed, “The president says, ‘It’s an hour meeting, and we’re going to talk about Afghanistan for 30 minutes and then Pakistan for 30 minutes’. Seventy-five minutes later, we still haven’t talked about Pakistan. Why? Because Pakistan is too ******* hard.” It’s time we make ourselves easier to talk about, less for their future than for ours.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 6th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (40)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Visits from Air Force One have been getting rarer anyway, and we might just be blessed for it.
And how many visits from the Higher than Mountain Friend and the Keepers of the Mosques can you count, for each in the reverse direction?
Mr. Kerry somehow managed to make it to our part of the world … only to dash whatever hopes we had in person. Not that the broader trend suggested otherwise.
If the 'broader trends' were already there, why did you have any hopes to the contrary, Brother?
Without the army’s silence, it could have grown all but impossible. In any event, it’s an improvement from the days of craven old People’s Party.
Selective Amnesia of the Commando's admission regarding allowing 'few Drone strikes', will not take this argument very far.
And besides drones, Pakistan must bury the term ‘Af-Pak’, re-engaging with the world in a way that shreds the hyphen once and for all.
Ah! But that is easy to achieve. All you need is some trash removal from NWA and Quetta.
Rulers of Pakistan, be it politicians,army or the assortment of thugs steal and park their looted money and children in arab countries or western safehouses,returning periodically to continue their looting spree. We can cry hoarse, nothing is going to change.
@Mirza "..Knowing full well that most of our favorite politicians keep their own kids out of Pakistan due to lack of security who would trust us with the security?.."
How right you are. Even the commando has his son living permanently in the USA, not to mentions he spent most of his post-commando days if london and usa!
"Imran Khan has cried himself hoarse over drones at every forum, and his protest march to Waziristan was big, brave and risky."
Imran khan should stop horsing around! It is very easy to shoot down a low flying, low speed drone. Why don't we?
Kerry deserves a "thank you" from Pakistan and the author - he obviously has a full plate of real issues to handle in the Middle East and took the time to visit Pakistan knowing that Pakistan hadn't put together a meaningful agenda. Authors racial slurs and comparing a Secretary of State to a special envoy tells you something about the Author's lack of knowledge and bias/prejudice.
It's sad to see such an immature piece of writing as an op-ed in ET. The racist and derogatory language used against John Kerry is shameful. One can disagree or even shoot down the words and actions of this diplomat, but that should be based on reason and argument. Why attack Kerry on personal grounds?
As usual ET will not publish my comment. The comments section seems to have become a closed club with the same names appearing over and over again.
@Mc Clusky what a cheap shot. I think freedom of speech is only for white race.
Afpak crap. We indians want you to prosper, there might be people who disagree but I sincerely want a prosperous pakistan. I am an Indian patriot but not a fool like the rss, bjp, etc. Our country is based on our secular constitution. I disagree with aman ki asha because common people are out of it. Keep in good health author, rab rakha and try to save Punjabi in west Punjab. Again...jai hind and rab rakha
What happens when 2 cats are fighting over a piece of loaf (bread)? Any 7-8 year old will tell you that monkey will relish it and cats will stay hungry. There is another scenario, what will happen when 2 monkeys are fighting over a piece of loaf and there are two cats (one wild cat and other domestic cat) siding with one monkey. The loaf will be torn in to smll pieces. One monkey will win and other (defeated) will be badly beaten. The cats will get thrashed irrespective of fact which monkey wins. India and Pakistan fight over Kashmir represent first scenario. Both countries (cats) have paid a huge price to so called mediators/monkeys (USA and Russia) by purchasing arms, planes, ships. Had there been no fight, money could have been better spent. An article in The Nation (5 august) states 58% Pakistanis are malnourished. Conditions in India are no different. The second scenario; two monkeys fighting over loaf is reflected by USSR occupation of Afganistan (loaf) and USA’s role in ending that occupation. In that fight losing monkey (USSR) is reduced to Russia. Domestic Cat (Pakistan) sided with winning monkey (USA) and proudly claims being a victor over a super power, but Pakistan is still waiting for healing of wounds it suffered being a frontline state. The wild cat(al Qaida/taliban) lives a life of wounds and suffering and is intoxicated by the fact of having defeated one monkey is ready to take on the other monkey. What is happening to Afganistan (loaf) is well known. Scenario 3.wild cat and victor monkey fighting and domestic cat not sure which side to take
"He is a walking fossil among the Democrats ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ He must be at home in Pakistan what with the ossified Foreign Affairs Adviser and the third term PM and the endlessly extended COASC.
"Year five into Obama’s sad little term +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Sitting in India I find the Year Five of Obama absolutely shining compared to the Five Year Zardari term. As they say people who live in glass houses shouldnt change clothes with lights on.
"and yes, a fully functional foreign minister please" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Patience Please. Wait till the COASC retires. Akalmand ko ishaara kaafi.
You called Kerry a WASP which I think translates as ' white Anglo-Saxon Protestant ', people who are credited with being amongst the founding fathers of the nation, people with old money.............I missed the connection you were trying to make. Yes if you spend time in the NE conrner you will meet people who have their noses up in the air and have a tendency to make subtle fun of the rest especially the mid-west.........but is that not normal, don't we see that just about everywhere ? Over all it was just a fun read.
@ Author: not withstanding all the criticism, you are pretty much right about times of India.
Af-Pak was coined to nail down the source of Afghanistan's problems, pity that the author lacked the intellectual capacity to comprehend it. I am not sure if the author knows where the Taliban leaders including Mullah Omar are hiding, not sure if he has the capacity or inclination to do some investigative journalism and find out either. Brother, are you planning on making a grand Political debut one of these days ?
@ Author Your write up definitely has a entertainment value...
"Kerry-as-game-changer theory: he’s not that great a diplomat." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ And Pakistan is not that great an ally. All in all made for each other:).
"Pakistan, just not respectable enough for any visit by the president. Part of this is down to the smoldering volcano next door: Afghanistan " ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lame excuse. Afgahnistan has seen multiple Presidential Visits.Please learn to take credit when its due:).
Pakistan lacks only one thing and that is self confidence. Its this which has been driving Pakistan from one camp to another. It was because of this that Muslims of India felt insecure in undivided India and opted for Pakistan. Nuclear arms are not a substitute for self confidence. Pakistan needs a leader who can install self confidence among people and who can move them away from foreign aid dependence and inferiority complex syndrome. Only a confident leader can do all this.
@McCluskey: Plz correct your facts. No big money is flowing to Pakistan under what you call Kerry Lugar fame. Americans are giving funds to their handpicked NGOs for purposes known to them. Most of this money is flowing back to Washington in shape of contracts to US firms and NGOs. Government is unaware of these KL fame flows.
@Author:
The article felt like pages taken straight out from the diary of a wimpy kid :)
The article started out commenting negatively on a newspaper, did a few rounds on how Americans are ungrateful to great land of Pakistan and ended with a notion that can be best described as day dreaming. You can object as much as you want but the rest of the world puts you in that Af-Pak bracket. . While I have seen some good articles from you here on ET, this one does not match up to the standards. Definitely not your best work.
You want to stand for "anti-India" don't want to follow, or look, or sound or associate with anything India ........ but you are unhappy with "Af-Pak" - but would be most happy to be hyphenated with India in the world stage and be called "Indo-Pak"??
More double doublespeak and hypocrisy??
Why all this hatred for US from whom you've been begging for survival for ever since you've been independant? If you want you hate US, fine, at least then stop accepting charity from it!! This double dealing is precisely why you are a laughing stock - a dangerous one at that....
I also think that pakistan must try to negate the narrative of tying pakistan with a stone age country like afghanistan. Pakistani foreign officials should take up that issue that we do not want to be tied with afghanistan with terms like Af-Pak, we have our own unique identity and we should stick to that.
The underlying theme +++++++++++++++++++ A litany of injustices piled up against Pakistan....Times of India ....and the US President that doesnt mingle with Pakistani crowds...as if the Pakistani President does. It would have been more relevant if the author would have analysed as to why Pakistan has become the fountain head of terror and violence. Is there any hope for Pakistan to emerge out of this? The stark reality of jail breaks is not lost on the wrold. In the ultimate analysis you get what you deserve...including coverage in the Times of India.
you mean - "lying republic of ours"
Asad, you churn out crisp and eminently readable but also very insightful articles that I generally find devoid of histrionics (much to my surprise I found someone saying this article was full of them), and although I don't agree completely with ET's editorial policy, you are an asset. ... @Babloo. Seems you are more concerned with Pakistan's ideology and historical links to Saudia, Iran etc than the average Pakistani. @Iron Hand: Did you read the article? Shameful how you criticize the article for things it doesn't really focus on to begin with.
@Babloo Right word is Greater Middle East for Pakistan and central asia so please next time be refered by this name....
The US diplomats and public may have put up with the presence of OBL in a custom built safe house in Abbottabad but they cannot forget all about it and start trusting us again. With the increasing lawlessness and dozens of murders of innocent natives of Pakistan each day, why would any foreigner be happy to come and visit Pakistan? Knowing full well that most of our favorite politicians keep their own kids out of Pakistan due to lack of security who would trust us with the security? With the jail breakup and attacks on military bases and police stations only a crazy foreigner would take a chance.
Excellent once again.
Iran with out even atom are standing tall and brave and Pakistan look like a Tiger but with out Tail what a shame we feels some time sugh......
What an unseemly attack on the primary benefactor of your country in my country? If the american public would have it, not a dime of aid would go to Af-Pak given the problems at home. And not a single Pakistani who wait in long queues to get into our country would be admitted with a visa.
Kerry (of Kerry-Lugar fame) fought incessantly to help Pakistan and saved Pakistan from abject poverty and pariahdom. Now, why all this hatred, not to mention racially loaded epithets (WASPs?), against Kerry? Never a good idea to bite the hand that feeds.
---Another WASP from Kerry's home constituency in Massachusetts (and no I don't have a big head of hair)
One feels that after the Abbottabad incident there has been an institutional change in the outlook of the power that be in america - this includes political power holders, security apparatus, intelligence apparatus and think tanks that influence foreign policy.
It is wishful thinking on part of the public or Pakistani intelligentsia to expect 'normal bilateral' relations with US built on equal footing. Pakistan would do well to integrate itself and a constructive and progressive state in the neighborhood first and foremost. It does looks like your current PM recognizes this. It'll be a very slow and painful process possibly taking years but in my opinion is the right way forward.
What's wrong with Af-Pak ? Aren't you closely related to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afganistan etc with ethnic and religious ties going back a 1000 year . ?
gibberish....&.rambling histrionics with little substance or meaning
LOL - you honestly wonder why a 21st century American president won't wade into crowds in Karachi handing out pens? Hmmm, do you think that might have something to do with changes in Pakistan since the 1960's? Perhaps it's not evidence of a lack of respect for Pakistan, but more about recognizing that Pakistan is a supremely dangerous place to visit for anyone, let alone the US president. Or do you suggest the president should fly into North Waziristan and hitchhike to Karachi to demonstrate Pakistan's "vitality."
" Seventy-five minutes later, we still haven’t talked about Pakistan." So like Pakistan. In one of her visits to the US as Prime Minister, Benazir spoke so much about India, that she was introduced to the US Congress, by a forgetful senator, as PM of India. Lets hope that in the next NSC meeting with Pakistan's president, Munter doesn't end up thinking that he is talking to Afghanistan's president.
Bravo. for too long pak media has been scrimping and saving its breath in what has been clear snubbing ofPakistan since Obama took office. clear, cogent, excellent piece that takes the US to task and advocates reengaging with the world keep it up asad raheem, your articles are a pleasure to read.