No, it was not, at least, where travel was concerned. There were, to be sure, documents issued even during the medieval period telling foreign powers that the traveller was their subject (they were not citizens then). Muslim countries gave bara’a, which were simply receipts of taxes paid that gave one the right to travel. Henry V of England issued a paper telling all concerned that so-and-so was his subject. The Japanese issued a passport in 1866 and the Chinese one in 1898. Other European powers, too, had passports but nobody insisted upon them except states, which were considered authoritarian and ‘backward’ like the Ottomans and Tsarist Russia. And by the time the railway became common in Europe during the late 19th century, passport controls were in abeyance in the western and central parts of the continent. Moreover, there were no visa restrictions. Thus, though fiction, it was possible to go with Jules Verne around the earth in 80 days.
But sanity cannot prevail long so World War I shot all ideas of less control on the borders. Passports were imposed with a vengeance and to make life difficult, visas were also imposed. As the visa was issued by the host country, it was not always easy to get it. In theory, this was to keep out spies, undesirable characters (like communists in the US), economic immigrants and potential terrorists. In reality, however, spies get visas through their own networks; communists need not be kept out of any country; economic immigrants keep coming at the risk of life and limb, and the capitalists actually profit from their cheap labour, so they allow them to stay later, but only after a great deal of avoidable misery for them. A better alternative would have been to develop the immigrants’ own countries but this will not happen because the ruling elite of these countries are both dictatorial and corrupt. And, of course, those giving aid are also corrupt, so most of the money is siphoned off by the external consultants and the host elite. Even so, in my opinion, the restriction on human movement creates more problems than it solves.
There have been moments of sanity, too. The Benelux Economic Union, for instance, had abolished visa control between Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands in 1960. In 1985, this was extended to France and Germany (West). This agreement was signed on a riverboat called the Princess Marie-Astrid on river Moselle in Luxembourg but, as this is near the town of Schengen, it is known as the Schengen Agreement. By another two years, all the members of the European Union except the UK and Ireland joined in. Later, Swizerland and other newly emerging former East European states also joined it. If you are travelling in Europe, the borders are a treat to cross. The flag of the country will tell you that you are crossing the border and you may have to slow down at some point, but that is all. It is a truly sane and civilised way of travelling. And the irony of it is that such an arrangement can be made for the whole world. For instance, when the 2007 cricket World Cup was held from March 13 to April 28, 2007, the Caricom Arrangement was made, allowing people from Antigua, Grenada, Barbados, Dominica, Guyana, Jamaica, St Kitts & Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent & the Grenadines, Trinidad & Tobago to travel freely in each other’s countries. But this lasted only till May 15, 2007. As I said, moments of sanity are few and far between.
In South Asia, we need a Schengen type of no-visa regime for citizens of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. We cannot compensate people for their sufferings of the past when daughters could not visit their dying parents (my mother could not!) but we can ensure that this barbarity should not occur in the future. This free movement of people might even pay off by promoting good will and peace. Can’t we ever be sane?
Published in The Express Tribune, August 5th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (36)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Mirza: ”The Mumbai attackers did not need a visa or port of entry. Terrorists do not apply for visa they can cross the border at will and do. It is the peace loving people who suffer and cannot visit their forefather’s home.” Just because a thief does not need a key to enter a home, does not mean that the homeowner leaves the front door open.
@sabi:
"It is our humbleness and great manners that force us to seek friendly relations with our neighbors including India but people like you think it other way round you are wrong."
The biggest target for these Jihadis is not far away West, but neighbouring India.
I am not basing my opinions on hearsay, nor am I a "victim of media hype".
There was a PEW survey not too long ago. And, this is what it had to say.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/05/07/chapter-2-the-fight-against-extremists/
24% of the people in Pakistan support LeT. That is 1 in 4 people. In a plane which carries 100 people(say), you will have 24 people supporting Terrorists.
And, you want India to ignore those 24 people? They don't carry a badge saying they support LeT or are part of it.
If the shoe was on the other foot, would you ignore such threats? Tell me honestly..
@Mirza: ''The Mumbai attackers did not need a visa or port of entry. Terrorists do not apply for visa they can cross the border at will and do. It is the peace loving people who suffer and cannot visit their forefather’s home.'' Very rightly said agree with you. @BruteForce: ''India should not let emotion get in the way of reality and give free passes to Pakistanis''
It is our humbleness and great manners that force us to seek friendly relations with our neighbors including India but people like you think it other way round you are wrong.There are millions of Pakistanis who make Europe, north America as their holiday destination and still people with lesser choices and less resources turn to south east Asian countries with far better tourist infrastructure the choice is big and we have nothing to worry about that.Humanity is suffering in this part of the world and we people of Pakistan(excluding fanatics) believe in serving mankind without prejudice and people to people contact is prerequisites. We believe there is no shortage of such good people across the border.You seem to me a victim of media hype.Would you pleas revisit your thoughts about Pakistan and Islam.
I feel sorry for sindhi peoples who became Palestinian in there own country ... after wave of migrants..
@someone I think its not too late go back...
Kuwait does not issue visas to Pakistan passport holders.
A few facts here: A very small part of Turkey is in Europe and most of it in Asia. Europeans do not discriminate against it because of religion but its location and its policies and death penalty. Pakistanis can get visa of very few countries including our beloved S. Arabia, Kuwait, and other Muslim countries where they are treated as sub-humans. It is hurtful to see so many hostile remarks from both sides of the border. There should be easy visa depending upon the applicant. For example there have been no terrorism incidents when visa was given to say 50 plus years old couple or small children. The Mumbai attackers did not need a visa or port of entry. Terrorists do not apply for visa they can cross the border at will and do. It is the peace loving people who suffer and cannot visit their forefather's home.
The author misses some important facts. It is people from Muslim countries, especially Pakistan, that experience great difficulty in getting visas to other countries, especially the western ones. The reason for this is the fear of terrorism emanating from Muslim lands, with Pakistan being the epicenter of global terror. So, it is not a surprise that other countries want to be careful not to let in potential terrorists.
Also, there is the case of people from all the third-world countries who want to get a visa to prosperous western countries and then, in violation of their visa deadlines, disappear once they manage to get in.
@Naz: And it looks like you never studied at all. If you hate Pakistan that much than GET OUT of a Pakistani newspapers website. Also it's laughable to be reminded of women's rights by a country which has the highest rate of violence against women. Try to be more reasonable next time. @ Insane: You're name really fits your description. @ RAW is WAR: You really sound like a RSS doctrinated loser. So stay out of a Pakistani news website. @ Ali Tanoli: No they won't but every Pashtun dreams of settling in Karachi and bringing their primitive culture in it. Try taking the seventy million Pashtuns and illegal Afghani brothers out of Karachi.
@Ali Tanoli: And they ( from U.P) were made fools once..i don't think they would repeat the mistake again of migrating to Pakistan.
@Ali Tanoli: Looking at the floods in Karachi, it may be other way around.
@khan ali: Have you ever tried to think the reasons behind such discrimination ? Image
" in my opinion, the restriction on human movement creates more problems than it solves."
Yes it may create problems for some ( willing to travel from Pakistan) But it helps to solve many avoidable problems for the host country to keep some at bay.
@Ali Tanoli:
all Indian Muslims are supposed to move to Pakistan. As per the partition arrangement. We can throw in Kashmir- if you take in all Indian Muslims.
@Writer have you remembered your forefathers had read lines of burial for Indian muslims when they divided and left India . Now why do you want to come to India ? or Are you realising your failure and want to make India a failure Islamic country like urs.
free visa regime for south Asian peoples hahahahahha whole U.P will migrate to Karachi please done be insane man..................
@Nadir:
I can understand you probalby read /studied in some taliban schol...You probably dont understand history of civilizations and that Indian ( read hindu) is oldest living civiization because of the tolearance...
You perhaps know India only for the women ( whom you can capture or enslave) and Money....I think you need to reorient your self to saner view otehr than the salafi Arab view....
when it comes to discrimination the real culprits are australia and canada, they prefer whites in general and irish, british in particular. if you're white brit, they issue you a visa without any question, but for asians or blacks its a whole different ball game.
" Can’t we ever be sane?"
It is utterly insane in the age of 9/11 and "travelers" like David Headley, to allow such kind of non-interrupted International Travel, especially from the Muslim world or people who have been to the Muslim world.
India should not let emotion get in the way of reality and give free passes to Pakistanis.
I do, however, add a caveat. Pakistani Hindus and Sikhs should be given easy, long-term, employment visas to India and on large scales.
They are the victims of partition and they are India's responsibility.
Reading the comments above I see too many negative thoughts about visa free travel between India and Pakistan.These are the people who have got rigid mindsets by years of brainwashing by media and by rumours going around . Such mindsets are not expected to change overnight . To get perfect insight about any place is to visit that place and meet people living there . I don't see any visa free travel between India and Pakistan very soon but beginning could be made by exchange of students and faculty . After all, what could be more better to initiate change in minds of people by targeting young population in both the countries . As for Pakistan before they ask for opening of borders they should try to reform their syllabus and textbooks which preaches hate against Indians .
@sid: Thanks for commenting on a pakistani news forum. I wonder why every news item is turned into anti Pakistani rant by you guys.
Lahore and its surrounding areas are transforming at a rapid rate. I am amazed at the industry I find between Lahore and Gujranwala. These industries are not some one room operations but extremely well run and well maintained enterprises. The only sad part is that most of these industries are non tax complying entities hence they dont exist in government logs. Lahore is also home to a vibrant and expanding packaging industry. The main clientle for this industry is Afghanistan and Central Asian Republics. I can go on and on but I concur with the author about the expanding role of Lahore in Pakistan's economy.
Problem of human movement can certainly be solved through smart technology. Sooner or later this is bound to happen as holding people in cages forever is not possible. As I foresee, smart chip will be implanted on the butts of a person. This chip will have all the information about the person including his digital picture , medical and criminal history and even his/her DNA information. Movement of the person will be monitored through GPS. I have very strong conviction that this will happen during next 20-30 years.
*"In South Asia, we need a Schengen type of no-visa regime for citizens of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives." *Thanks but no thanks. We usually don't like Pakistanis coming to India. Same case with Bangladesh. May be Pakistan and Bangladesh can have no-visa regime if they want. Pakistanis are seen with suspicions in India. I don't know why they don't understand. Does everything needs to be told on the face?**
@author: " ... In South Asia, we need a Schengen type of no-visa regime for citizens of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. ... "
The utter naivety of the author amazes me. Why would India want to commit suicide by allowing unrestricted entry to Muslims from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Maldives ?
The ball is in Pakistan's court. Unless they stop sending terrorists to India it will be insane to think that India will allow easy visa facility to Pakistani citizens. You have no one to blame but your govt.
We can and I hope India will open its borders to Pakistan, but the problem is movement of terrorists. When Pakistan cracks down on the LeT, and other terrorist threats to India, and cooperates in apprehending any who try to cross the border, what you and I hope for can happen. With the Army and the Government now on the same page, LeT may be less privileged. imho.
Even in the EU, Turkey is not allowed in to the union mainly because of the Schengen Visa. Religion is a very powerful tool to distributively overthrow governance. Could the EU have had the Schengen if it was not Christian across the board?
I agree with open borders with no restrictions whatsoever in theory but as long as countries have vast difference between their economic development (and more importantly social welfare), it is not likely to become a reality. A more practical solution which already exist for citizens of most developed countries is that they can visit almost the whole developed world without Visa for short duration.
Unfortunately since there is strong animosity between countries in Pakistan's vicinity, its not likely that we will be able to visit most countries in our vicinity without much hassle.
There was no need to have a visa in the past because travel was not easy, it required a lot of resources, determination and most people were not aware of the different regions and there were no huge economic differences. As a result only a small fraction of people could actually travel to distant countries and no country had the resources and need to control its border.
As an atheist I don't want any relations with pakistan. No need for any visa.
This will remain a pipe dream unless Pakistan changes course rapidly.
ETBLOGS1987
You mean well and it is really unfortunate that the man was not allowed o isit his 96 year old mother. Cannot see any justification for that. Hopefully with the new liberalized regime by India where Pakistanis over 65 would get visa on arrival, such situations would not repeat.
Having said that, a Schengen type of visa arrangement between India, Pakistan and Banladesh Simply makes no sense in the current situation where India already has millions of illegal Banladeshis. Also after Pakistan has even admitted what it did post the Soviet Afghan resistance I.e. push thousands of jihadis in India that not just resulted in thousands of civilians dying but hundreds of thousands Pandits becoming homeless it would make no sense to allow a free visa regime. I'm am expressing my views as an Indian and it is also possible that Pakistanis have their own legitimate concerns about such an arrangement.
Why would anyone want to go to India to begin with? Nothing to see and do there in enemy country.
Na u people wanted to leave separately so be it...........we have no visa for Nepal and Bhutan.........and visa on arrival for Sri Lanka and Maldives.........
china and ummah contries will give pakistan no visa regime...........
i'm surprised you missed out scandinavian countries they are the countries that pioneered regional co-operation in everything people in malmo sweden travel to work every day to copenhagen
Well prepared article with short history of restrictions on human movements across the world.If strong economies.i.e.Europe lift restrictions on movements of its citizens why not other counties and for that matter sub.continent can follow that sane act.Let me add that Europe had much more complex situation than what we have in this part of world.If we can not move freely in whole world we must have the choice to move without restriction in sub.continent its not a luxury but a universal right of the people of this small continent.This part belongs to 1.5 billion people not few millions hawks who continue to make humanity suffer for their vested interests.Kudos to the writer.