Lootera: A period film that almost never ends

The film fails to keep the rather clichéd mystery intact as the story drags on for an ‘ideal’ end.

Rafay Mahmood July 07, 2013
The film fails to keep the rather clichéd mystery intact as the story drags on for an ‘ideal’ end.


Any film that tests your patience and doesn’t deliver anything worthwhile is a bad film. The unreasonably long saga of love and deceit, Lootera, does not fall into that category. Unfortunately, it is far worse. Despite a clear plot that makes you think that the film is nearing its end at many points, it is an anthology of pointless sequences collectively termed as a film. It is unfortunate, that a film, with such a compelling first half, can make you regret sitting through the rest of it.

Directed by Vikramaditya Motwane, and partly based on author O Henry’s book The Last Leaf, Lootera is a period film based in the ’50s. The film is about a happy-go-lucky landlord who lived with his daughter Pakhi (Sonakshi Sinha), until an archeologist Varun (Ranveer Singh) comes to initiate an excavation around one of the temples owned by the landlord. As fate might have it in a clichéd setting, the handsome boy and the pretty girl start talking and the boy steals the girl’s heart. With Pakhi’s father’s blessings, the two eventually agree on getting married. However, Varun never makes it to the marriage, and what follows is a sharp turn in the story which you are likely to have figured out already through the title of film. The title perhaps plays the biggest role in revealing the main storyline. If it remains at the back of your mind then you’ll easily predict what the rest of the film is all about. A different title or rather a more subjective one could have been way more suitable for the film.

Although Ranveer’s character is rather flat and composed, it somehow manages to save the mystery from being blatantly revealed at the very beginning. While Varun is a handsome young man with perfectly made hair, you can hardly feel the presence of his character. This is the reason why it takes you some time to absorb the beginning of the film because apart from clichéd moments like Pakhi accidentally pouring tea on the boy’s hand or dressing up like him in his absence, it has nothing much to offer. Supporting characters like Varun’s friend played by Vikrant Massey, and his uncle played by Arif Zakaria, help building up the story. The script isn’t bad but a better actor, probably Abhay Deol, would have made the much-needed impact.

Sinha, surprisingly, suited the role to perfection and you will be able to see a more unidirectional, focused and evolved version of the character she played in Dabangg. For a change, her character as Pakhi actually develops with time, and her physical presence accompanied by a natural stubbornness in her dialogue delivery makes her the ideal sari clad girl of the ’50s. Unfortunately, for all those who were happy about Sinha getting rid of her nose ring in the film should know that she gets it back in the second half — sigh!

After an immaculate film like Udaan, Motwane disappoints us with Lootera because it seems that he was way too occupied in having an ideal and complete ending to the film (which was not really needed) that he ended up losing the real gist of the story half way through.

Regrettably, Lootera falls victim to a common tragedy — a director making a mess out of a well-plotted story by relying on a typical Bollywood technique of ‘more, not less, is more.’ Other than the never-ending story, this film is no more than the director’s infatuation with crisp Urdu/Hindi dialogue delivery and vintage looks. We have seen much better period films from Bollywood such as Zubeidaa and Parineeta.

Verdict: Although we do not recommend it as a must-watch, if you are so amazed by the trailers then go ahead but don’t hesitate to leave only 10 minutes after the interval because from there on  it’s just a mere waste of time. Our pick for the week remains to be Ghanchakkar!

Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2013.

Like Life & Style on Facebook, follow @ETLifeandStyle on Twitter for the latest in fashion, gossip and entertainment.


JSM | 8 years ago | Reply

@Wassim: I am a post 47 born who has heard stories about partition from his mother who was at Amritsar in 1948. That defines my mindset. For me, till the Mumbai attack, Pakistan was a country beyond the moon- very far away from my home. During my travels, if I met a Pakistani, I had no interest in him- though speaking the same languages, I did not feel inclined to enter into a conservation with a Pakistani who in my mind was from an extremely distant land in which I had no interest. After watching the 3 day attack on Mumbai in 2008, I was curious to learn what were Pakistanis like, what was their thinking process, how did they treat their own people, what was their perception of the world and what did they want to be. Since 2008, Pakistani English newspapers and clips on YouTube have given me a window to look into Pakistan. I summaries my assessment- there are wise people in Pakistan who do speak their mind on various issues in a logical, balanced and sagacious manner and there is media a which gives them a platform to do so. I am sure your country has better days coming and a bright future.


Sam | 8 years ago | Reply

Totally agree with the author. He has it spot on!

When I saw the movie, I lived the female lead, Sonakshi,, but I thought that other actors could have done a much better job than Ranvir, even Shahid Kapoor.

I found the movie loosely associated too, and the sound track could have been better.

What I loved were the costumes and chance to regress to yesteryears!

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read