They bring “experts” to their talk shows, who are professionals, often retired generals, diplomats and police officials with experience, even though they sometimes seem to lack the kind of wisdom, which should have come with that experience. Some such commentators are “regulars”, who privately cultivate anchor persons and programme producers to keep appearing on the idiot box.
But as television channels have multiplied, another class of commentators has come up. They are introduced as “analysts”. They have no professional qualifications but comment on any issue, from energy to terrorism.
This programme that I refer to above was a repeat telecast on terrorism. It so happened that just before I watched it, terrorists had struck at the Nanga Parbat Base Camp and killed 10 mountaineers of different nationalities in cold blood.
It was thus, with a lot of focus that I began to watch the programme. Of the three participants, one was an analyst. The man had no training or knowledge of fighting terrorism, insurgency or crimes of violence. Nor did he know the elements of national security, beyond what you can pick up from a couple of drinks with a security contractor. Among other inane comments, he announced that there was “insurgency” in the country. And, surprise surprise, there was “terrorism”, which was “bombs, explosives, etc”. At the end of the programme, he had the cheek even to suggest names for negotiations with the Taliban!
This person is a conman of the variety that flourishes in Pakistan. He is a member of the self-promoting, social climbing, upwardly-mobile-wife-in-tow class that has been aptly called the ‘cut and paste’ generation, the very antithesis of thought and reflection.
The other two panelists, both professionals, tried to retrieve the situation from banality by hinting at the complexity of terrorism and its nuanced relationship with the security situation in the region. The hapless anchor person, too, did what he could. But in the presence of a con analyst, the show seemed hopeless.
Obviously, the programme had been recorded before the Base Camp incident. And thus, for its lack of serious consideration and concern, I found it disgusting, a sheer waste of air time on a sombre subject. It was thrown to cliches and platitudes.
Regrettably, television is not the only field where confident tricksters thrive. They are also found in the corridors of power, in politicians and public servants alike. Right now, they are busy infiltrating the ranks of the new government. They are a political and administrative menace the state institutions are not impervious to at any level.
People seem not to comprehend how lawless this country has become. Somebody said recently that living in Pakistan was like living in a prison. If you pressed the light switch, you are not sure if there is power. If you turn the tap in the morning, you are not sure there is water. If burglars break into your house, they are unlikely to be caught. It is the same uncertainty before a judge. You are never certain that the law will help you. It always is “maybe, maybe not”. “That,” my cynical friend suggests, “is life in a prison. No rules.”
This is the kind of Pakistan Mian Nawaz Sharif, now the prime minister of Pakistan, is going to fix. He has a very trusted lieutenant as the interior minister. His own brother, Mian Shahbaz Sharif, is the chief minister of the largest province of the country, Punjab. Their party has just been voted massively into power. No politician could wish for more authority in Pakistan. People are prepared to trust them and give them the support they need for major decisions. But they must get on with it and do the job without listening to the conmen around them.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The best programme on television - NOT TO BE MISSED
Banana News Network.
One with Rehman Mallik with police light on head was priceles!
Some of these green horn anchors are hilarious if not pathetic. There standard opening line is "A very warm welcome"! How will you react to a warm welcome in the era of load shedding in the month of June and July in Pakistan? Then they bring security analysts.The credentials of most of these analysts is mostly arm chair generals. Then there is one who ran a shop for security of houses and premises by name of Brass track.His credentials is that he fought in Afghan Jihad and read some jihadi literature and a pathological hatred for Mossad,Us and India besides Muktibahini,Mujiburrahman and TTP.But he has knack of saying psyops,fourth generation war! Another tactics of anchors - could you reply to what earlier guest has said,therby promoting inane verbal duel without much depth. At the end it si great entertainment! Long Live talkshows. It helps bring cheer to a hapless populace.You won't find such circus anywhere in the world! PS They come up on screen by different name of the programme on different channels.That means there is a market for such entertainment programmes.
Those are 'job applications', not expert opinions or analysis. Please change the channel when irritated.
Its a common media cry
when they watch programs which don't agree with them, they say ooh media is negative.
Develop a thick skin. On media MOST people won't agree with MOST other people. Because in our country we mostly disagree.
@Falcon things are much more serious than just switching a channel this shows a more serious issue showing that such conman are appearing on the media. His views shall be heard, it is because of these "experts" the people tend to grasp things the way it should not a simple example, when there was economic recession in USA, i saw several of these "experts" saying "Oh Amreeka is bankrupt now paying the price of the war" But what they fail to realise is that there is a difference in slow economic growth and bankruptsy
Excellent but not well expressed: Maybe due to fear of backlash from the TV anchors and media. Mr. Falcon: I have excess to Geo TV in the city in live in. I prefer to watch "wrestling, Cricket or One Tree Hill" over all talk shows with one exception of "Aappass ke Baat" when Najam Sethi and Muneeb Farooq are together.
A Peshawary
This man works for RAW CIA MOSSAD ! The Sudanese intelligence is also involved.
Onto your Facebook battle stations everyone !
Ghazwaiya Hind till Lunch !
@Falcon: this is no excuse, all most all the channels are doing same.
Maybe the author was not invited to be the 'expert' on the panel, thats why the grouse. But in general yes, the experts in these shows, including India are just jokers, no nuanced arguments, no logic in debates, the person with the biggest lung and the most unshameful becomes the expert. The anchor is also after promoting an agenda or his career, not getting any views across.
Indeed, the nation is fighting 5th generation war and the analysts are the think tanks of the nation. In 5th generation war, battles are not won by tanks but by think tanks, and that Pakistan is blessed with many, including the bum
One thing is missing from this article i.e courtesy and kindness. Its full of defamatory and derogatory statements and not worthy to be published. Lets ask him how much is he or his fellow civil servants qualified when they join the institutes that formulate and implement u policies for our country. The greatest reason of Pakistan's failure is our B.A pass full of themselves corrupt civil servants.
Out of curiosity, wouldn't it have been easier for the author to just switch the channel rather than spending a lot of time first watching the show and then writing an angry article about it?