"It is important to let them (the new Pakistan government) settle down, and let them take stock of the situation. Hopefully, they will start giving us signals that they mean business on those issues which are of immediate concern to us, and that includes accountability for the 2008 terror attack on Mumbai," Khurshid said.
"That is something we cannot wash away and should not wash away," Khurshid said in an interview to Straits Times in Singapore.
He also noted that the messages given out by Nawaz Sharif both during and after the campaign, publicly as well as privately have been very positive and meaningful and that the Indian Foreign Office had responded to that in a meaningful way.
Talks between India and Pakistan had halted for over two years in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks that were blamed on the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Seven Pakistani suspects were been charged with planning, financing and executing the attacks that killed 166 people in Mumbai.
Responding to a question on whether there had been any new movement in the Indo-Pak peace process, Khurshid said, "There's a lot happening. But the actual dialogue, the resumed dialogue, has to be re-resumed because, as you know, there were events that caused matters to come to a virtual halt."
"Many of the important decisions we were taking as confidence-building measures were slowed down. As far as the actual dialogue is concerned, we will get back gradually," Khurshid said.
He also said that India was also looking at Pakistan's growing energy demands.
"Due to the urgency of supply of power and gas in Pakistan, we sent an experts team right way and they are now sending their team back to us. So we are already looking at one major area of importance to them," he said.
When asked whether he sees better ties with Pakistan under Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, when 1999 Kargil War started, Khurshid replied, "The Kargil War is now history, we don't want to go into that. I think he (Nawaz Sharif), like anyone else, comes with a lot of experience from his time in the opposition."
"I think that he is showing signs of great statesmanship. He has certainly become a focal point of tremendous amounts of hope in Pakistan. He has given out a good message all around.We are responding to it with an open mind and with a positive attitude and hope that we can move forward rather than look back at what happened in the past,” Khurshid said.
On a question on whether Prime Minister Manmohan Singh would be able to visit Pakistan before the end of his tenure, Khursid said that he could not make a statement.
“I cannot predict and cannot anticipate anything. But obviously, I think the story would remain incomplete if there wasn’t a face to face meeting between him and Nawaz Sharif. But there has to be a considerable amount of background work done. Once that work is done and we place it before the prime minister, he will make the call," he said.
COMMENTS (32)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Why only Pakistan and why not India?Because on various occasions/times even many times India showed cold shoulder,laziness and used delaying tactics and accused Pakistan of baseless allegations to prolong the important issues' solutions and now expecting that Pakistan has to respond immediately on India's concerns..........
@Naveen: "@Water Bottle: No, you are just another loud mouth who is yet to figure out the decency needed while posting on public forums."
Interesting comment coming from someone who makes it a habit of making personal attacks on others.
A couple of weeks back you ticked @Strategc asset off for speaking on behalf of all Indians. Yet you have no hesitation in arrogating that privilege to yourself where you feel you can decide which Indians should be allowed to speak. See here : http://tribune.com.pk/story/572972/americas-diktat/
@all trolls of both sides of the border... It's just an old record used to play occasionally... That's it..
looks like hatred is mutual on both sides,and god forbid, possibly non-reconciliable Satish Chandra?-never heard of him;ever been elected?must be some demi-god with a loose tongue;studying in america makes one CIA-agent?a fancied joke.(100,000 indians study in usa yearly,that would make close to a crore cia-agents in india by now.9-11 was an event watched live world over.I guess everyone has a right to denial,whatever purpose it might serve.Bangla-desh episode- it is better to listen to Bangla-desis as to who the culprits were.Only major issue is kashmir,and needs to be worked on
India's government is a proxy for the CIA. The requirement, put in place by Manmohan Singh, for mid-career Indian civil servants (sending Indian military officers for training to the United States has the same purpose) to go to United States universities for training so their future career prospects, promotions, etc. are controlled by Americans is meant to make India's government as a proxy for the CIA more perfect. There has been a long-standing requirement in American and British universities that to receive a Ph.D. degree from them, Indians -- this included Manmohan Singh -- have to agree to work for American or British intelligence agencies. India's legitimate ruler -- Satish Chandra -- has been systematically suppressed using 24-hour satellite surveillance for the past 36 years. IndiasLegitimateRulerSatishChandraDOTblogspotDOTcom
@Water Bottle: Shouting loud and making emotionally charged, prejudiced rants does not account for evidence. Why don't you send me a link to even one Indian newspaper that reported this statement of Khurshid on front page (or any page) and another link for a politician campaigning in an election on the plank of relations with Pakistan.
@Gp65: I am pleasantly surprised and happy to see your reply to waterbottle. My apologies for the american part yesterday, though I stick to the rest of part and the broad ideological bent that I've noticed among Indian expats (incidently even Noam Chomsky acknowledged it in one of his interviews).
@Water Bottle: Salman is not Kashmiri, although why that should matter is not clear to me from your comment. The confusion may have arisen because his father, Khurshid Alam Khan, who later became the Minister of State for External Affairs, worked for a while with a transport company in Kashmir. He is a Pathan and recently retired as Governor of Karnataka. The family's base is in Karimganj, UP. KAK is the son-in-law of former President Zakir Hussain. He has a distinguished background, although when he was Minister, a Pakistani official called him a "rented Muslim", after the Minister had something to say about Pakistan in Parliament. There may be something in the rest of your comment: the UPA now looks at all issues, from foreign policy to terrorism, from food security to disaster relief, keeping the 2014 elections in mind.
@all pakistani friends..
we are not dying to sell power and gas to you,plz be informed that mr sharif has made statements several times regarding his wish to import electricity from india,,,by no means i m trying to say we r doing any favour it is just pure economic,,
yes pakistan market is significant to us ,in the same way indian market is very much significant to you...
"the whole gdp of pakistan is equal to gdp of one state of maharashtra"
@ Lala Gee: "Sir, we also cannot wash away what happened in East Pakistan and Indian Occupied Kashmir, and what is happening in Baluchistan, KPK, and elsewhere in Pakistan. Don’t think the people of Pakistan don’t know anything,despite our government’s policy to keep quiet." Sir, we also cannot wash away the Pakistani sponsored and aided tribal attack on Kashmir, 1965, 1971, attacks on Red Fort, Parliament, Mumbai and sending armed murderers into Jammu and Kashmir. Your govt is quiet because it can't find any proof of Indian involvement in the happenings in your country simply because only a fool will get into a cesspool:) peace and cheers
@ Water Bottle: Sir, we all know that politicians say one thing and mean something totally different. I read you comments and, more often than not, am in agreement with them. As a fellow Indian ( who lives in India) * I would request you not to bring in religion/heritage etc in the discourse. Regarding our Pakistani friends, I just wish to point this out.......there is a news item in this very newspaper about a large number of children having missed polio vaccination earlier this month. Sadly there was not a single comment till a short while.ago Any number of tunnels and ports to be built by foreigners in your country cannot compensate for lack of healthcare, education and self-respect. regards
Hopelessly hoping.
@Lala Gee: Don’t think the people of Pakistan don’t know anything, despite our government’s policy to keep quiet. Yeah!!! Textbooks of the entire world lie about everything in Pakistan and only 'Pakistan Studies' gives the truth and the absolute truth because some anonymous 'intelligent' man said so and it is written in 'Pakistan Studies' and apparently (and unfortunately) you were the batch topper who sincerely believed in the text!!!
I think that the Statement reflects the perception in India after Gen Kayani said in Srilanka that the Pakistani Army stands for Regional Peace ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If you believe that I would like to sell you a Tower in Dubai Marina...going cheap...
@gp65:
That was my mistake. My bad.
I based it on a news paper article I read several years ago. Yes, He is not a Kashmiri.
@Falcon:
"Is Khurshid responding in his own capacity or that of a Govt. functionary? If so, how does it matter what his background is?"
You are right that his back-ground is not important here. Any foreign minister would do the same job.
I mentioned his Kashmiri heritage because, it has got something significant in electing him the foreign minister.
I never meant to say (and did not say) that because he is a Kashmiri muslim, he is made to make this statement.
Trust me, Indian politicians are too smart to pull such cheap tricks.
@Naveen:
"No, you are just another loud mouth who is yet to figure out the decency needed while posting on public forums.Those who live in India (do you?) know that such foreign ministry statements are barely reported in media unless somebody’s on a state visit and have zero relevance for elections which are fought on state level or constituency level issues."
I will not respond to the first part, because you lack the basic common sense to understand me or the honesty to see the truth. There are many dishonest people in India (if you are one) like you.
Your second point makes me doubt if you even read news papers regularly. Comments made by the defense/foreign and prime ministries towards Pakistan/China have a different significance.
"In my view, All Khurshid is saying to Pakistanis is that “Don’t disconnect, we’ll get back to you, Be positive, Tension Nako”. Apparently he’s quite good at entertaining people."
Yeah? That's what your knowledge of Indian politics says? Either you are too ignorant or too naive.
Hopelessly hopeful.
Meh- empty words for Indian audience now that election is coming up. He knows Pakistan will ignore because it is not meant for them anyway.
26/11 was washed away by MEA contrary to what he is saying. India made many unilateral concessions to Pakistan on trade and visa front. But Pakistan failed to reciprocate and implement any agreement on their side. Thus niether has there been a progress on the 26/11 trial nor any positive action on ground by Pakistanis on any other front. This leads to such a wishy washy statement which really says nothing.
@Water Bottle: I get the drift of your INC and Khurshid bit but it does not seem to come together based on the information provided in the comment. Is Khurshid responding in his own capacity or that of a Govt. functionary? If so, how does it matter what his background is? Secondly, putting out this statement is an expression of nationalist rhetoric to counter-balance BJP in your view? Lastly, based on my limited analysis of Pak-India relationship, it is my understanding as well that we won't be able to develop lasting peace unless there is a just closure to the unfortunate 2008 Mumbai tragedy with perpetrators brought to justice. From that perspective, I don't see this statement as a rhetoric disconnected from national sentiment on Indian side. Why do you think otherwise? (P.S. I am a Pakistani)
@Water Bottle: No, you are just another loud mouth who is yet to figure out the decency needed while posting on public forums. Those who live in India (do you?) know that such foreign ministry statements are barely reported in media unless somebody's on a state visit and have zero relevance for elections which are fought on state level or constituency level issues.
In my view, All Khurshid is saying to Pakistanis is that "Don't disconnect, we'll get back to you, Be positive, Tension Nako". Apparently he's quite good at entertaining people.
Why on earth would we care about what India says or not?
@Pakistanis
Don't worry.
This is theatricals put forth by the Indian government.
If you think that these comments are meant for Pakistan, you are wrong.
These comments are, in the heart of the heart of all honesty, meant for Indians.
We Indians are supposed to believe that Khurshid, who is a Kashmiri muslim, is fighting for the legitimate cause of Indians and we Indians are supposed to vote for INC in the coming elections.
Let me tell you an open secret.
Nobody, not another soul in this world will tell you the truth with brutal honesty like Water Bottle does. :)
That's why Water Bottle is hated by both Indians and Pakistanis alike. Good Night.
On one side Indian Mr. Khursid wants to open friendly dialog n on the other side put conditions. His selections of words does not give out friendly flavor But intimidation, Pakistan needs to tell India discuss Kashmir n water first than talk about it's humble offer of electric n trade.
“That is something we cannot wash away and should not wash away,”
Sir, we also cannot wash away what happened in East Pakistan and Indian Occupied Kashmir, and what is happening in Baluchistan, KPK, and elsewhere in Pakistan. Don't think the people of Pakistan don't know anything, despite our government's policy to keep quiet.
India has had 'immediate concerns' since 1947! It just needs to grow up and learn to move on. If you don't want peace, well there are 101 reasons to remain bogged down in the past.
@Concerned: Just take every development related news on ET and the first comment would be that of an Indian. Shows you how obsessed they are with Pakistan.
First respond to Pakistan's concerns: occupation of J&K, Capture of Siachin, Support of Mukti Bahni, sponsoring BLA, TTP and then Pakistan will respond to your concerns too!
It seems that India raises "concerns" only when Pakistan makes efforts to build economic relations with other countries.