Advani knows the Gujarati voter and how the BJP was built in Gujarat — not through the genius of its current chief minister, Narendra Modi. The BJP took Gujarat over decades, starting with the BJP’s earlier avatar, the Jana Sangh, which got less than two per cent of the vote when it began contesting on the Hindutva platform in the 1960s.
The party built its constituency in the state with immense patience and by adding on a few percentage points in the popular vote through the 1970s and the 1980s. It was Advani’s Ayodhya gambit that finally won Gujarat over to the BJP. Gujaratis responded to the communalism of Advani’s message as no other state did and the Congress has not won an election in that state, or come close to winning it, after the Babri Masjid was pulled down.
The last time the Congress won a majority in Gujarat was, in fact, in 1985. So, it will be difficult to convince Advani that Modi is the magic ingredient for his party in that state. Advani also knows a thing or two about charisma built through a divisive and communal appeal. It was his own stock in trade till he decided, a few years ago, to moderate his image.
This knowledge is what got Advani upset at the coronation of Modi as the leader of the BJP for the 2014 general elections. Advani doesn’t buy the idea that Modi is indispensable and he might argue against the idea that Modi is even important. He was seething over the fact that people were seeing merit where, in his opinion, it did not exist or existed because of men other than Modi.
But he must pay for his own mistakes. It was, of course, Advani who saved Modi from being sacked when Atal Bihari Vajpayee wanted him to step down for his awful managing of the riots of 2002. And through all the years that Modi built his image at the cost of others in the BJP, Advani was silent. Modi finessed out first the old guard of his party in Gujarat. Men who built the BJP, like former chief minister Keshubhai Patel and undefeated six-term Surat MP Kashiram Rana, were forced to quit the party. Not because they had suddenly become secular but because Modi was threatened by them. They went to Advani, but he had no time for them. Modi then took over most of the powers of the cabinet, at one point holding the ministries of finance, home, industries, energy, mines and minerals, ports, Narmada and a few others. No other minister was even vaguely important. Advani did nothing to curb Modi’s power then, either. Modi took on, and defeated, even the RSS, by pushing away the man it had stationed in Gujarat to keep a watch on the party. This man, Sanjay Joshi, was humiliated after a sex scandal and remains on the margins. Advani did nothing.
And so, when Modi came after Advani’s job, having created his image through demagoguery in exactly the same way Advani did, there was nobody to save poor Advani.
In my opinion, it serves him right. No good comes out of divisive politics in the subcontinent. Advani took pride in building an ideological party but the problem with ideology is that a purer version of it always threatens the establishment. That is what has happened. Modi’s fresh Hindutva is more appealing for those who like that sort of thing than Advani’s faded version.
But how effective has been Advani’s short-lived mutiny? I think it will be more effective than it is thought to be. Even though Advani withdrew his resignation a day after he sent it in, the act will live on. It has already been given life by the uneasiness with Modi expressed by the BJP’s most important ally, the Janata Dal in Bihar. And every time Modi will now come out in public, he will face the question: but what about Mr Advani’s concerns?
The old man’s revenge isn’t over in that sense.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 16th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (29)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Lala Gee:
I am sure you might be happy. But, I prefer to avoid misery.
@Yuri Kondratyuk:
"@Lala Gee and @solomon, looks like you guys need a room!"
There would be no fun without you.
@Lala Gee and @solomon, looks like you guys need a room!
@solomon:
"“The cyber campaign – started before the 2007 assembly polls through the BJP IT Cell – used to be a more centralised process. But the structure has evolved into a more decentralised and amorphous one over the years,” said Shashiranjan Yadav, the former vice-chancellor of Kutch University and architect of the BJP’s cyber campaign in Gujarat in 2007. “Now a large number of net-savvy BJP party workers and sympathisers are actively campaigning on cyber space largely on their own,” he added."
Thank you for clearly demystifying the reasons, though I had the idea, for the overwhelming presence of 'Hindutava' diehards here defending BJP and Modi so vehemently that it looked like some missionary work. On the other hand, the absence of commentators belonging to center and leftist parties, even though these parties have much larger following, was a surprising enigma for many. Thank you once again for making things clear.
@ModiFornication @Bewildered
Here is something more hilarious,
http://www.hindustantimes.com/editorial-views-on/ManasChakravarty/Goa-Namorandum/Article1-1077085.aspx
@ModiFornication:
ROFL. Hilarious. Hahahaa. Imagine Modi (impersonator) performing the role of Hank Moody. Simply hilarious idea, thousand times funnier than the original one. ROFL.
After seeing the level of Modi's fanfare in this OpEd, I am sure "Modifornication" (like Californication) tv serial would be highly successful in India.
Oh my modi's cyber attack room which HE initiated operating from Gujarat for his election campaign is in full swing ... these paid commentators forgetting that general public in india can see other bimaru states like MP and Bihar have become progressive and not an already developed state of Gujarat .....
"The cyber campaign - started before the 2007 assembly polls through the BJP IT Cell - used to be a more centralised process. But the structure has evolved into a more decentralised and amorphous one over the years," said Shashiranjan Yadav, the former vice-chancellor of Kutch University and architect of the BJP's cyber campaign in Gujarat in 2007.
"Now a large number of net-savvy BJP party workers and sympathisers are actively campaigning on cyber space largely on their own," he added.
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/narendra-modi-cyber-campaign-cyber-activists-facebook-community-page-lok-sabha-elections-gujarat-chief-minister/1/262032.html
so whats the use of having "PAID" commentators from the BJP IT cell
Watch this Mr Patel. This is how Mr Modi has defined Hindutva.;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8zad0cBfSQ
Please make this video statement of Modi as the basis of your next article and educate us if anyone in the world should have any problem with this.
@Gujesh: @hindu: hindutva is identical to talibanism....preaching perverted forms of ISMS.....now dont categorise it as good hindutva like good talibanism. @MSS: whats wrong?are you embarassed if modi is shown his true place. ...in the dustbin of history just like hitler....mussolini ...
@Arijit Sharma.
The “New Hindutva” is about education, infrastructure, equal opportunities for ALL, law and order, industry, etc.
How new is this 'New Hindutva', and how it differs from the 'Old Hindutva'? And why a campaign for 'education', 'infrastucture', ..................'industry' needs a different nomenclature such as 'New Hindutva'? You think your 'ALL' wouldn't understand what 'education' is, if you simply tell them that you are for 'education for ALL'. One obvious measure of all fascist ideologies is their need to practise Demagogy.
@hindu: As far as Yeddy was concerned, I am well aware of the dynamics there. Therefore, I am not sure what the BJP could have done. Bear in mind that BJP came to power only because of Yeddy and his antics -- Yeddy shed tears at the drop of a hat and extracted sympathy from the people when he was dumped by the JD(S) after their quid pro quo arrangement. . Sacking Yeddy in Karnataka when he was first indicted for corruption would gave created a sympathy wave for him and he would used it for traction within the BJP or independently as he eventually did with the KJP. . The cardinal mistake that BJP made in Karnataka happened AFTER Yeddy resigned as CM and was imprisoned. BJP should not have given in to his pressure tactics and selected his nominee.
@ModiFied: Please do not quote facts or present proofs and above all, do not reason! Some careers at ET are utterly dependent on promoting ignorance.
Gujarat turned it's back on Congress because of its culture of corruption, sycophancy and lack of progress under its rule. Keshubhai Patel et al turned out to be no better than Congress. Advani had his chance as Home minister but he failed to impress. The average Indian voter cares for running water and electricity, roads without potholes and babus and ministers that get the job done without their palms being greased all the time. It is that simple.
@hemant
@Arijit Sharma Wonder what you will have to say about serial murder accused Amit Shah’s prominent role in BJP under Modi .
I guess, it will be the standard response as in "He has not yet been convicted in a court of law." However, they have a separate moral yardstick when it comes to UPA minister/officials. Every allegation of misconduct is accompanied by a demand for the resignation of the PM, while they showed no spine to expell Yedurappa. Yesterday a minister from Modi's cabinet has been convicted for corruption. Tell that to a BJP troll and he will hide behind, "Congress is more corrupt".
And so, when Modi came after Advani’s job, having created his image through demagoguery in exactly the same way Advani did, there was nobody to save poor Advani. Question (since this line seems to be central point around which this excellent work of journalism revolves) - Which is this "Advani's job" that Modi went after? As far as we know, Modi hopes to become the BJP PM candidate, while Advani was hardly in the reckoning. Even if Modi was dumped as being too risky a choice, it is unlikely that Advani would have even been made campaign manager for the 2014 elections. Mr. Patel has been saying repeatedly on this very site that he believes Modi will not become the BJP's PM candidate - being forced to eat his words based on recent events, he launches (yawn) yet another (predictable) personal attack with little substance.
Hilarious how the two Indian writers on ET are nostalgic and fawn over Advani now that Modi has been elevated in the BJP. . Advani is a man without a mass base anywhere in the country. I am also not really sure what he stands for at the moment as he has dithered on his positions numerous times.
This article is wrong in so many levels.
Pushing the old aside is nature's way of ensuring there are new ideas, new energy and more diversity in eco-system.
If oldies refuse to step aside, or if a single dynasty/clique holds power for too long, then the system is bound to rot. Look at congress party, or DMK/SP etc. They are ideologically moriband, they can't find new leaders or thoughts.
BJP would do well to develop a system where no one leader gets entrenched (even if it is the founder). They need a 'creative destruction' for new blood and ideas to emerge.
This is how most mature democracies work. To hanker after the old isn't the right thing to do.
"It was, of course, Advani who saved Modi from being sacked when Atal Bihari Vajpayee wanted him to step down for his awful managing of the riots of 2002." This is misconception. Arun Shourie has writtten that even Advani supported Vajpayee, but most of other BJP leaders opposed it. Worst riots had taken place all over India during Congress regimes including Sikh Riots, but no one was advised to follow Raj Dharma. Why only Modi should be isolated ? And despite being new to the administration he was able to control riots in three days and this should be appreciated considering non-cooperative attitude of neighbouring Congress Govts. who refused to send additional troops as requested. But for the media hype created by pseudo-secular gangs, Modi would not have been where he is today.
@Arijit Sharma.: You are in for severe disappointment the 3 main Hinduttava demands : Mandhir , Uniform Civil Code and Article 370 are about to return to the forefront of political discourse by BJP . Wonder what you will have to say about serial murder accused Amit Shah's prominent role in BJP under Modi .
@MSS: It is really helpful to get some insight across the border
@MSS: Aakar should realise by now that Advani is 87 and just because he formed BJP it does not give him a right to lead till death. Both he Manmohan Singh should retire and give others a chance to run the nation. The party decided in their wisdom to give Modi a chance and Advani should accept. A person is never bigger than the party. Advani seems to have forgotten it.
Dear Mr Akar Patel, here is the video link in which Mr Modi himself explains his views about religion;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=2q7v1YPDkUQ&feature=endscreen
Prove to the readers if he hates Muslims or anyone from any religion.
@MSS: Re ":Why do you write so much about Modi in a Pakistani newspaper? " Because it is part of news and analysis, which you will find in any good newspaper. Just like any good paper will discuss the elections in USA, China or Iran or politics in South Afrika. Indian papers too discuss the Pakistani politicians and the political scenario. I consider ET to be a good paper and I read it precisely for this reason : it gives a good all round coverage. You'll find editorials and analysis about other countries and people in The New York Times and The Guardian. Should these papers should limit themselves to US and UK ? As an ET reader yourself (and I would put you in the intelligentsia of your country), I'm surprised you have the proverbial "frog in the well" outlook of the world.
A piece from Aakar I would fully agree.
@Author: " Modi’s fresh Hindutva is more appealing for those who like that sort of thing than Advani’s faded version."
Will you please post a single statement or video of Modi during last 5-7 years which proves his Hindutva of any brand ? Any video in which you find his Muslim/ Christian or any other religion's bashing?
I am big fan of Modi Ji, But i can never accept a person from teli caste to lead India, it is against our ancient traditions and customs, and most definitely forbidden by scripture.
@author: " ... That is what has happened. Modi’s fresh Hindutva is more appealing for those who like that sort of thing than Advani’s faded version. ... "
The "New Hindutva" is about education, infrastructure, equal opportunities for ALL, law and order, industry, etc.
@Akar Patel, Why do you write so much about Modi in a Pakistani newspaper?