Information and communication technology is a fast-moving high-tech sector where policies get outdated quickly. The government should take up the job of creating the new ICT policy urgently, with inputs from all stakeholders. However, there is no need to wait for the policies to be in place before starting the long-delayed, vital ICT development programmes.
Broadband deserves a special treatment because its impact on the Millennium Development Goals is now widely acknowledged. Since 2010, the UN Broadband Commission for Digital Development has been actively helping countries prioritise the roll-out of high-speed broadband networks through National Broadband Plans to support their goals of inclusive economic growth and competitiveness in the information age.
Most countries have realised the importance of Optic Fibre Highways and are working feverishly to increase fibre penetration. When I was working at Universal Service Fund, we made good progress in the programme, “Optic Fibre to every Tehsil”. Now, the need is to extend the fibre to all the 6,000-plus Union Councils, terminating at the community tele-centres there. Even in the short term, thousands of jobs will be created through this effort.
High-speed broadband connected community tele-centres could become a source for all kinds of information for villagers. Each centre, equipped with PCs, allied equipment, Wi-Fi hot spots and renewable sources of power, should be run by rural development organisations that have roots in those areas, with professionally trained trainers. The broadband connectivity available at these centres could then be extended to neighbouring schools, healthcare centres, post offices and government offices, etc.
Out of all the destinations of broadband, none is more important than in schools. Information and Communication Technology is all-encompassing since it impacts every sector of the economy. Therefore, if our new generation does not grow up with the knowledge of using ICTs, they will be left behind. It has been learnt that connecting schools with broadband is not the only need of the hour. In fact, the provincial education and school administrations should be on board to develop/provide relevant local content (with links to the curriculum), create portals, implement child protection policies, and train the teachers. The need to train cannot be stressed enough.
It is a pity that even Afghanistan has 3G and we do not! Worldwide, there are more than two billion 3G subscriptions. The PML-N manifesto favours 4G (100 million users worldwide). It is the private sector that then goes for the most viable technology in the given spectrum band. But there is simultaneous space for 3G as well as 4G. Therefore, the spectrum for both should be auctioned, with less emphasis on the price and more on widespread, time-barred roll-out obligations.
Fortunately, in ICT, government budget constraints are not something to worry about but the government has to provide clear policies, fair regulations and a level playing field to promote competition and let the citizens enjoy the fruits. If at all the government has to intervene with cash, it is in areas that the private sector doesn’t find lucrative enough. And, for that, there is the Universal Service Fund. It is the private sector which brought the 2G revolution in Pakistan, along with massive amounts of foreign direct investment, and it is the private sector which should be given the challenge again.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 11th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Thank you all for very valuable comments. I would like to respond to 2 issues: 1. Afghanistan - Randomstranger, as understood and mentioned by some of the commentators above, the intent was in fact to praise Afghanistan - that despite being in a war for 3 decades now, they have gone ahead of us in this domain. Superb! 2. Energy and other crises - AHmed, we cannot postpone developing ICTs till some other important crises get resolved, not only because we cannot afford the time, but also because ICTs are actually going to help in resolving those other crises! Ever heard of "Smart Grids" for efficient management of Energy and "Education and Information" to the farmers and other villagers to make them more productive for themselves and their families? One problem is that we cannot stop thinking of Broadband as only YouTube and Facebook. That is why I have stressed in my article that it is important to develop/provide relevant local content and provide training on how to use it.
Pervaiz Sahib, You have brought the ICT issue at the right time. I believe the new Govt. has the motivation, capacity and talent to manage several of the priorities in parallel. We can define the the 'Top 10' priorities and work in parallel. Gone are the days of serial processing. Already within days of taking over we have seen Govt's action on multiple areas -- energy being one of them. If the challenges presents themselves now, then this is the right time to act, not some other time. We should consider these challenges as opportunities. It is time to grab these opportunities and benefit the Nation.
In fact, with USF funding available and 3G/4G auction potential (USD 1 Billion) ICT would be low hanging fruit which can have a significant positive impact on the ICT, Education and Economy.
Broadband access can change the world for our rural population. We all know the positive impact of education. 'Khan Academy' is a case in point, and there are many more examples in spreading education. Today, even the Ivy Leage schools have accepted the fact that Online education is the best means of spreading education. We have to bring our literacy rate at par (above 90%) with the developed nations.
Your comment on Afganistan should be taken in the positive sense (as I believe was the intent of it). If Afganistan, with so many problems and in a' war like' state can see the benefit of 3G then the case for Pakistan is very clear.
If we consider the impact of ICT on our neighbours economy than there is a lesson to be learned. ICT related revenues of India are projected to be US $ 100 billion this year. A growth from US $ 65 billion last year. Even if we take a 'fudge factor' of 10-15% of the quoted figures, it is still a significant number to reflect upon.
ICT professionals can easily see the benefits and opportunities Technology can bring. It is the Planners of the nation who have to be convinced. It may be a good time to organize forums where public and private entities get together, first to bring in awarenes and then to propose practicable solutions and thrash out a 'fast track' to improved economy.
Finally, in the quest for the 'fast track to improved economy' ICT should be a key component. Technology by definition if used to speed up connetivity, rapid response and decisions and implementation, shall no doubt make a big dent towards growth.
First thing first. Anusha Rehman first should help remove the ban on youtube. Second, India is fast becoming the biggest hub for all telecom services in the region by making very huge and aggressive investments specially in the submarine cables. It looks as if after the demise of the existing SMW3 ans SMW4 cables, Pakistan cant access the IP cloud in far east, specially Singapore and Malaysia without going through the Indian infrastructure. That would be a night mare scenario for Pakistan in terms of security.
Well Said Mr. Shahzad... Electricity and telecom are two different fronts and telecom is not dependent on Govt Funds or Money, rather it brings extensive foreign investment provided. In past few year Govt policies have stopped that growth and agree with Mr. Parvez Iftikhar for the issue he raised. However it should not be 3G because 3G is going out of market and most of existing 3G operators are even planning to upgrade / migrate to 4G...
Spectrum should be auctioned independent of technology either 3G / 4G and whatever operator wants to deploy, though by this manner Govt may not get very high price for spectrum as compared to auctioning by limiting to 3G but the people of Pakistan will be facilitated in best manner.
"It is a pity that even Afghanistan has a 3g network, and we do not". Have some respect Mr.Iftikhar. How does it feel when people from western nations stereotype Pakistan as the poorest and worst place on Earth? And it is not fair to look down upon Afghanistan considering the fact that they are under a constant state of war for the past 30 years, in which our "deep state" played a major part. And this comes from a Pakistani.
Best regards.
Giving priority to Energy Crises only :::: Statements seems familiar as Pak-US strategic dialogue related to ICT development initiatives also ends up in same spirit to divert attention and funds to energy sector projects.
So now we are again stuck in old glitch. We need parallel processing in all sectors with equitable focus. For Policy Review you definitely need financing and that is not there from USF or Finance Division or Planning Division. You have sought support from World Bank as it is not the GoP priority area as far as expenses/investment for ICT policy development is concerned.
However, i wish all the best to new Minister and appreciate such proposals from experts.
May be some good proposal get noticed at higher levels. At least Parvez sb played their part properly! Thanks for sharing your valuable thoughts.
Energy sector and telecoms sector are totally different issues.
1.) Money generated from auction of 3G license ( USD 1 billion) will be used to pay off circular debt in power sector hence reduce power outage.
2.) 3G auction will create huge jobs in construction and telecoms sector which is a plus point.
3.) 3G auction will help govt to increase tax base in country.
4.) Currently our telecom engineers are not able to get jobs abroad as they do not have experience of market technologies like 3 G and 4 G. 3G auction will help on this point as well. It will eventually help to increase remittance towards Pakistan.
5.) It is insane to stop Govt from doing so.
Yes, we need electricity, justice for all, good governance, curtailing of Govt. expenses, ICT development, development in education, riddance of terrorism, and the list goes on. It is also a matter of prioritization as our means are limited. However, the article did mention that the private telecom companies and USF are enough to finance the development. So, ICT development can continue in parallel with energy development, and will not cause a burden on the Govt. All that is needed is to treat it as development and not revenue generation by license / spectrum sale.
@ Ahmed No doubt the need for addressing energy crisis is most urgent, but you can not deny the importance of development in the telecom. Energy crisis needs it own time to be resolved, and it will not at all hamper the developments in the telecom sector. As far as 3G and 4G are concerned, its the telecom operators who will have to invest not the Govt, so these are two absolutely different paths.
Do you remember the initial use of internet in the urban area, yes it was movies and something similar to facebook and it still is in most cases. Once people are provided with the service they ll eventually find the use of it to help their lives. They have equal right of the using everything we are provided with.
No doubt need for taking drastic steps for energy is most important.
Dear Parvez Iftikhar sb,
I respect your proposals but the bitter fact is that Pakistan needs electricity on urgent basis rather than your proposed 3g and 4g solutions. All the efforts and synergies should be diverted towards energy crisis rather towards these controversial issues.
Further your proposal of laying down fibre optics and broadband connections at tehsil level, is of no use; on account of high cost of installation and maintenance. Think from the villagers' mind..at max such a person can use the broadband to stream movies or to use facebook; nothing more than that unfortunately.