But why is the circle not complete? Simply because the man who dismissed an elected government; sacked and imprisoned the superior judiciary; said he would “kick” Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif; arrested Nawaz Sharif when he returned home after the Supreme Court, no less, had allowed him to return; and sent him abroad on the same plane that brought him to Islamabad, and generally misruled the country for well on nine years, sits not in a jail cell awaiting trial, but in a sort of confinement in his 17-star luxury farmhouse in Chak Shehzad.
I might as well tell you that after his accuser in the judges case withdrew his charge, I wrote a letter to My Lord the Chief Justice of Pakistan as one whose human rights would be trampled upon if Musharraf was let off scot-free. For, alongside others, my wife and daughter and I had been harassed by Musharraf’s goons who literally shoved still and video cameras into our faces while “recording” our presence at demonstrations demanding the restoration of the judiciary, and generally made a nuisance of themselves.
As one who had been lathi-charged and tear-gassed by the Islamabad police led by an absolute oaf of an SP whose name escapes me, and who seemed to take pleasure seeing women and children tear-gassed and then lathi-charged, and who sat or lay on the road leading to the Chief Justice’s House, gasping for breath.
But I did not mail it: for the simple reason that this is a time of immense joy for all of our countrymen and women: when an elected civilian government handed over power seamlessly to civilian caretaker governments, who in their turn, are now in the process of handing over to other civilian elected governments. Allah be praised. Masha’allah.
I did not mail it because the so-called Commando, now a sorry figure who actually escaped from court — I ask you — a man who once also threatened Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto in the following words: “The last punch will be mine”, has punched himself out cold. There he sits, surrounded by luxury and 20 batmen and official cooks and gardeners and chauffeurs and telephone operators (being a former full general) with nowhere to go, no one to call.
I had suggested in “What goes around, comes around” in this same space on April 25, ’13: “So, I say ... what goes around comes around. Personally, I abhor unfair behaviour towards anyone, and will always stand up for those who are dealt with unfairly.
“Which brings me to the matter of the Commando wishing to go to Dubai to meet his dear mother, a lady I have admired ... may she have good health and may these days of peril for her son go easy on her. Indeed, may the Commando himself stay safe.
“But we could all do without Ahmad Raza Kasuri’s histrionics on live TV when he pretended to cry, … pleading for Musharraf … to see his mother. May I remind Kasuri of the time when his leader (until 1976, when Kasuri stood in line for a PPP ticket for the ’77 elections despite having registered a murder case against ‘Saab’ — his word for ZAB — in 1974!) was the victim of judicial murder and his wife and daughter were not even allowed to attend his funeral rites by an army dictator?
“ … That Nawaz and Shahbaz and (the late) Abbas Sharif were not allowed … to bury their father? …That Asif Ali Zardari was not allowed to visit his mother … because he was in the Commando’s prison? What goes around, sirs, comes around, remember that.
“As to the Commando being allowed to go to Dubai to visit his mother, I am all for it ... if he doesn’t come back to face the charges against him, good riddance: he could be tried and sentenced in absentia if found guilty. The country could very easily do without him and his malevolent influence … ”.
So there we have it friends, indict the Commando for his crimes; send him on parole; give him a date of hearing. If he doesn’t come back, try him in absentia and make him a pariah in the rest of the world.
And now to the Tyrannosaurus Rex in the room: the Deep State, in regard to Pakistan’s diplomatic and security-related dealings with the rest of the world and particularly with Afghanistan and India, in that order. I disagree with those (e.g., author and journalist Ahmad Rashid in today’s IHT) who say that the new government should not “wrest” policymaking but “create a partnership in which the establishment concedes negotiating power to a civilian prime minister”.
Why should the onus of creating this “partnership” be placed on the shoulders of the elected prime minister? This is by no means to suggest that the establishment’s input is not essential in the making of foreign/security policies. Of course it is critical.
An excellent starting point are the peace overtures the prime minister has already made to our neighbours by saying Pakistan’s soil will not be allowed to be used against any other country. This is the way to go: to live in amity and brotherhood and stop playing our silly little games.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 7th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (35)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Memories of convenience. Perhaps he could spend some energy and time on the 'whys' of Musharraf. it off course does not matter that NS played around dangerously with this country or that the CJ still has cases to answer . How can they even sit , let alone pass judgement on some thing they are themselves a party to. Musharraf was more democratic than these so called democrats
Excellent article. Mush should be treated in the same way he treated NS! Why this 17-star luxury? And where are Taliban volunteers to guard from whom he is not in prison cell but under house arrest?
come with something new,, commando is so much in ur mind....or i dont know what sort of grudges u have for him
@ET.....Where credit is due.........Thank you for posting my comments on Kamran Shafi,this is for the first time.
@Kamran Shafi.......The readership of your articles have time & again commented to leave alone the Armed Forces of Pakistan,but MARD-E-NADA'N PER KALAM-E-NARM-O-NAZUK BE-ASAR.Now one's advice to you is that divert your time & energy on research in agriculture,epidemic of polio,education,corruption,clean drinking water,poverty,unemployment & crime against women etc. There are a number of issues being faced by the Nation on which you can dwell. One is sure that this will earn you accolades than ranting on every piece you write against Army,President Pervez Musharraf & Imran khan.One is also sure that ET will not post these comments,because they don't to receive such remarks about KS at least rom this mortal, they always do that?
@Bilal: You have to tie something to Musharraf. What will you tie to him? The state of emergency was declared by the executive branch of his government i.e. the PM and his advisers and Musharraf signed that. In a court of law, facts matter. You may not like Musharraf, but he has the legal basis for refuting the charges against him.
The 1999 takeover, the judiciary acquiesced to the takeover by signing the PCO. Sometimes the doctrine of necessity has to be given its due and things cannot be considered totally black and white.
Pakistan was in dire straits when Musharraf took over. Without clear evidence against him, its best that Pakistan turns over a new leaf and let the past be.
With all due respect to Mr. Shafi who is afflicted with a dease called Musharraf paranoia. What comes around is not good here. So PPP looted the country and dragged it down into the ditches in the 90's and then came around in 2008. PMLN looted the country, left it penniless, 2nd most corrupt in the world and has now come around in 2013. How is that good for us? Are we so stupid as a nation to believe the the 3rd time around is going to be so different? I am one who is not thanking his lucky stars. Next time please talk about something else. Thank you.
@Pathan:
before i die,, i want to see one article by Mr Kamran Shafi, which has a topic other than Pak Army or its ex Generals
@np:
@Pathan: Check out the article last week. No reference to army or generals.
Looks like your wish is granted. Go Ahead.
if judiciary too is seen as an aggrieved party then the only arbitrator of power remaining would be anything but the law. we either come around trusting the judiciary to interpret the law and do their job, or we don't. the point is, just because the law-breaking general threw out the judiciary and played havoc with all national institutions from parliament to armed forces and took us for a ride doesn't mean the we import impartial aliens to sit in judgment over his wrongdoings. surprising thing is that with so much publicity, vitriol and debate not even once the counsels for musharaf have ever said that their client is innocent. they just go around condemning, complaining and threatening. they don't have an argument to defend his actions as there is none.my sympathies for Musharraf's mother. I wish no mother would have to see her son fall from grace. but she as Pakistani ought to be aware of his wrongdoings. after all she's a mom! let our judiciary decide his fate alike any other individual's. the court is doing a fine job. and I wish he gets justice, something that he has denied others for a long, long time.
If some how we could just respect and uphold constitution of Pakistan and the laws of the land. The main question comes to my mind is if indeed Musharraf has violated the Constitution of Pakistan then he should be tried in the court of law and see to it that fair trial takes place and if found guilty then he should face whatever comes his way.It is heart warming to see another civilians government taking over and perhaps time has come that the military do what they are paid to do to safeguard the borders and let an elected government run the country they know best. Thank you for such a heart warming article.
Dear Mr. Shafi,
I have admired your guts and gumption for the many years you have spent writing of the woes of Pakistan and its generals, and the unfairness of it all.....corruption, high handedness, lack of accountability, atrocities committed on the innocent and the journalists, the Establishment, the ISI, ...the list goes on.
You, yourself, have literally been subjected to intimidation and serious threats to you and your family's safety and well being.
And now, something has happened... you did play your part in exposing the merciless underbelly of Pakistan, and ought to be congratulated for the same, and staying safe to see the transition to some sort of civility to this troubled land. Perhaps a new baby is born.
However, while you smile at the baby results with hope, you need to nurse the baby with some gentle stories, like perhaps being a senior, I am sure you have some nostalgic stories to tell from your past, and make a shift from your usual articles. Everyone needs a bit of variety and a mix of seriousness with the love for life, and its exquisite moments.
Mr. Shafi, dig back into your Punjabi background and spin a few tales of the past. Your readership will not fade away. Tell us some of your person, and your experiences.
with best wishes.
SS
Why our learned columnists feed disinformation to public? Zardari was jailed by Nawaz Shareef not Musharraf. In fact Musharraf let Zardari go.
One big mistake Musharraf did was he never become a dictator he is blamed for otherwise Mr Shafi would not be complaining Cameras shoving his face, it would have been bayonets scaring his face.
Saudi Money has won Mr. Shareef this election but how long media will fool public. Soon this honey moon will be over.
@Historian 1: ".... Author is so much paranoid of Musharraf,..." . Perhaps he is not. KS is trying to get even with the army for his own bitter experience there by punishing someone who is an easy target and had nothing to do with him. . Musharraf is his Voodoo doll. It is a good therapy they say, for someone at this stage.
Dear Mr Shafi, If you do believe in "what goes around...does indeed come around" then when you make a conscious attempt to humiliate certain individuals then get ready for the "lathi-charge".
I have always admired your writing and look forward to reading your writing each week. You have to advocate that any one who promotes the idea of "what's good for me is good for the country" is bound to fail. This applies to politicians, army generals, police constables, teachers, etc.
Peace overtures and extending an olive branch will only go so far if the underlying foundation for a longer lasting strengthening of relationship is not pursued.
@doom: he writes on many subjects,, but when bashing Army is not the actual topic, he uses the last para of his article to do that
i think we have too much blood thirst to want actual justice in this country , it doesnt serve us well
@Pathan
Isn't that a bit like asking say Paul Krugman to talk something else other than the economy...? I presume being an ex-army man this is his area of interest and expertise (of sorts).
I have great respect for KS and his work. However, by suggesting that despite multiple acts of high treason we should let Mush go he has revealed the hidden army officer in him. How many elected leaders have been finished by the establishment, why not one general put through the judicial process? This is the only way to stop military coups against elected govt.
If the general is tried by the judges who are an aggrieved party, the trial will never be perceived to be fair. This is a difficult situation particular when the judges are not even pretending to be fair and unbiased.
How convenient? Mr. Shafi thinks the readers are naïve enough to agree that Musharraf if allowed parole would ever come back to Pakistan's courts law. We all know his respect for the Pakistani laws. Seems Mr.Shafi is pitching in for the ex-gen. The gen. should be done justice and made an example of for all would-be usurpers. Only if the food-loving mian sb. had the spine.
Kamran sahib,
Please spare us the same old. Time to move on and write about new things. Not sure what regurgitating "What goes around, comes around" helps with?
1/3 of this piece is direct quotes from previous piece. I see how this works
Such an emotional and childish article. Author is so much paranoid of Musharraf, he is making it a personal war. Kamran Shafi should calm down and wait for the things to unfold in near future. Commondo is back and we are going to get more surprises.
Such an emotional and childish article. KS is completely paranoid of Musharraf. How much hatred he shows for Musharraf, reality is completely opposite. Commondo is back and things are unfolding one by one. KS should relax and wait for the results. He is only hurting himself through such emotions.
Full circle will not complete and it will remain your wish. Mush is gonna stay in country and fight all the political cases against him. Its a tough time for him no doubt but he has been n tough time many time befores. I would call him a man of steel. Not like MNS who chickened on Kargil.
@ali, pathan I do not really agree with the intensity of author's language sometimes. But i can never forgive or forget what the army dictators have done to this beautiful country of mine. I have seen two such dictatorships in my life time. Democracy is not perfect but its the best solution to mainly all the problems of our society. Democratic countries which are developed today, are there bcoz they kept the process going. I think we need more people like Kamran Shafi who could keep reminding the generals where their place is. No one in their right mind will ever forgive Zia. And it will take us some time before we realise what kind of damage has Musharraf done to us. Untill then, i am happy someone keeps bashing the ex generals. May be some heat would reach to the current ones too this way? They have a job to do and God know they are paid thoroughly to do it (the perks of being a general!). Still we are loosing billions in a fight against terrosists who were made in pakistan in the madressas planted by a dictator. And we again recieved billions in aid to actually try and eradicate the same terrorists during another dictatorship. Who do you think is the looser in this scenario?
On the Musharraf issue - after a lot of huffing and puffing I knew that deep down you have a beautiful heart made of pink marsh-mallow. On the politicians taking control of foreign policy - your suggestion is spot on.
@Pathan
You are asking for the moon!
@Pathan: Check out the article last week. No reference to army or generals.
Musharraf made a mockery of the State of Pakistan and of the fundamental rights of the People of Pakistan for more than 8 years. He should pay the price for this.
before i die,, i want to see one article by Mr Kamran Shafi, which has a topic other than Pak Army or its ex Generals
why has this newspaper become a space for the author's vitriol...? yes, we know musharraf was evil but do need an entire article devoted to hatred?
Revenge is best served cold.And revenge of democracy is sweetyer as not a drop of blood is shed yet nemesis dies hundred deaths of shame and guilt!
Now the time has come we should put jawaans to back to there barracks for once and all.