Wishful thinking versus reality

We may see rotation of political parties through elections, but we're far from seeing a new vision or positive change.


Ayesha Ijaz Khan May 28, 2013
The writer is a London-based lawyer and tweets @ayeshaijazkhan

The elections are over. Many thought Nawaz Sharif’s PML-N would emerge as the winning party but few could have predicted a sweeping victory. On the other hand, the PPP has seen a rout in the 2013 elections while the PTI has won enough seats to form the government in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) but could not rival the PML-N nationally. Post-elections commentary is mostly optimistic, some even euphoric. Yet, I see little cause to celebrate. It may be well and good that a civilian government completed its term, was booted out electorally due largely to poor performance and that the incoming government is not a weak coalition cobbled together but one that has a clear mandate for an established party that could theoretically deliver. However, there is much to despair as well. The recent elections were the bloodiest ever. Certain parties were targeted, their workers and candidates killed and kidnapped, reportedly because of their liberal and secular stance.

Although much ado had been made of an impartial Election Commission, headed by a widely respected figure, Fakhruddin G Ebrahim, little action was taken by him or the commission to level the playing field when some parties could not campaign for fear of their lives, while others canvassed unabated. In the public at large as well, there was little love lost for those politicians who suffered the brunt of the targeting. Perhaps, they were so despised for not delivering basics that the average citizen could not muster any sympathy for those widely believed to have usurped state resources for personal aggrandisement, while the rest are left to 15 hours of power cuts. But there is a danger in such apathy, for it emboldens those who target and the culture of violence takes root. It may be Yousaf Raza Gillani’s son or Ghulam Ahmad Bilour’s brother today but tomorrow, it could very well be those who have just been voted in.

Much is being written on the enhanced voter turnout and the increased awareness and politicisation of the historically apolitical, often referred to in good-natured Pakistani humour as the ‘burgers’. This is all good for democracy and the country we are told, but I am not sold on this logic. Rigging is not new in Pakistan. Surely, it shouldn’t happen but shouldn’t the priority be pre-poll rigging in the form of target-killing or signed agreements disenfranchising the entire female population in certain areas of our country?

Imran Khan is often credited for mobilising the ‘burgers’. Previously disinterested in politics, they fell for Imran’s mantra that the choice was “no longer between left and right but between right and wrong”. His followers, whether 16 or 60, seem to have imbibed that rhetoric and viewed this election as a choice between good (Imran/PTI) and evil (tried and tested parties). The reality, however, is that politics is not about good and evil or right and wrong but about ideological positions. Granted that it’s not just the PTI that is ideologically wanting, Pakistan’s other political parties have also lost their way ideologically, relying instead on patronage and constituency politicians, who hover from party to party, remaining in government incessantly. Thus, though we may see a rotation of political parties through elections, we are far from seeing a new vision or positive change.

The PML-N has rightly been talking about fixing the economy on a priority basis but I wonder if their better minds are able to make the connection between combating terrorism and improving the economy. Often, they seem to have the cause and effect reversed, thinking that an improved economy would result in less terrorism, when in fact it may be very difficult to revive the economy without first tackling terrorism. What’s worse is that since both the PML-N and the PTI are soft on terrorism and have cultivated populism by promising an end to “America’s war”, a wishful segment of the population will continue to expect this of them. It remains to be seen whether they will change their stance when reality strikes or continue to call each other out on showing some ghairat.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 29th, 2013.

COMMENTS (11)

Ali S | 11 years ago | Reply

In the article, the author said "The reality, however, is that politics is not about good and evil or right and wrong but about ideological positions."

The reality is that politics in Pakistan is largely divided among ethnic and demographic lines. PML-N is admittedly the most popular party in Pakistan by far, but that has very little to do with their ideological stance.

Raja Islam | 11 years ago | Reply

In my opinion the biggest fallout of this election was the ethnicization of politics in Pakistan. PPP being the only national party was put to rout. If you look at the voting patterns, Punjabis voted for PML, Pathans for PTI, Sindhis for PPP, Balouchs for nationalists and the Mohajirs for MQM. This does not bode well for the country.

In terms of priorities, nothing will change. The focus needs to be on law, order and justice, elimination of corruption and then liberalization of the economy. As long as vested interests rule, whosoever is in government will continue to pander to the interests of individuals and the state of lawlessness and corruption will remain.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ