None of this should be personal, although it is hard not to think of it as personal. Opportunities like these do not present themselves very regularly. A military dictator caused this country to be amputated, ordering mass killing. Another military adventurer also denied Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto a proper funeral. The Commando did not allow Mian Sahib to attend his father’s funeral. One should not kick when someone’s down as a general principle, yet it is trumped by the greater principle of fairness. General (retd) Musharraf has to be held accountable for treason and most significantly insulting us as a people. The Commando has been granted bail in BB’s murder case and will probably get it in Nawab Bugti’s case. The prosecutor in BB’s case was mysteriously murdered and that has already been forgotten, it seems. To be fair, it would be extremely difficult to hold him immediately criminally responsible for these murders due to requirements of proof. As far as treason is concerned, no formal proceedings have really started.
The formal legal arena is, perhaps, not the best place for deciding what is treasonous and what is not? Treason is a political issue and needs political determination. The logical culmination will indeed take place in the court, and hopefully, if and when that point arrives, the courts will be up to the task. Yet, the moral force has to come from the people, from parliament. An example is Yahya Khan being declared a “usurper” by the Court, without the requisite national consensus on military intervention. The Commando has already been humiliated and more importantly rejected, so why bother now? Why risk “institutional conflict”, argue the realists. There is a lot of merit in this argument. However, what really is “institutional stability”; does that mean beware of upsetting certain quarters too much or else, you know, the system might be “derailed”.
Once we agree that it is not personal, a logical corollary is that no one person has the right to forgive and forget. Let us have the national conversation on what needs to be done with General (retd) Musharraf and those directly complicit. ‘Moving on’ is sagacious advice and we should but only once clear responsibility has been fixed.
Why the Commando has to be held accountable by us, as a people? Firstly, it is the right thing to do. Secondly, the people need closure. Finally, that challenge has not faded away yet. While free and fair elections were being conducted and now as the post-electoral euphoria goes on, bullet-riddled dead bodies keep getting dumped in Balochistan. Mian Sahib has made all the right statements on forming a Kargil Commission, normalising relations with India, making known the findings of Abbottabad and Saleem Shahzad Commissions. It is important that everyone in parliament urges him to keep his word and support him when he does. It might be useful to read the appropriately named report, “Roots of Impunity” released by the Committee to Protect Journalists. Amongst other things, the opinion of the establishment on politicians, politics and democracy is disturbing, yet fascinating. The views of some powerful people in the country are exactly what the stereotype would lead you to believe.
Mian Nawaz Sharif has displayed signs of maturity in the past five years (barring the representative failure of his role in the Memo proceedings) and has displayed some clarity on the civil-military relationship question. Truth and reconciliation works both ways. The onus is also on Mian Sahib to come clean on the Asghar Khan case. He already has the mandate of the people. A statement made to the people of this country on his past follies, particularly the formation of the IJI and the 1990 election, will only help him, and the people of this country.
As far as the argument of institutional harmony is concerned, trying the Commando will only help in the long run. Our armed forces at present fight for the survival of this country and need all the support of the parliament and the government. Yet, the drawing of lines which cannot or should not be breached will bring clarity.
Mian Sahib’s opening statement on the willingness to negotiate with the Taliban is not a confidence-inspiring start. His view is admittedly milder than that of Mr Khan. Yet, the difference seems to be quantitative and not qualitative. The TTP has extended the customary response to the “offer of peace” by Mian Sahib at the centre and the PTI in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, with bomb blasts in Quetta and Peshawar. The soft line on extremism during the campaign was electioneering, and even if one forgives it (very, very hard to do, mind you), there are absolutely no excuses post elections.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 26th, 2013.
COMMENTS (44)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
ET: This person has written to me. Please allow a response.
@Raham Dil: "As far as your comment “Wrong analysis and wrong conclusion,” please stop posing as know-it-all. Be more circumspect in your comments."
I have never claimed o be a know it all. However when you draw incorrect conclusions from my comment that I never intended, then it is not difficult to point out that the conclusion was wrong. You said that I am against anything that is positive for Pakistan and hence have an anti-Pakistan attitude, merely because I disagreed with YOUR statement.
"Yet, minorities are well represented in the Government and the institutions". SOrry. Minorities are not well represented. Please tell me one non-Muslim who has been President, PM, COAS, Supreme Court CJ (and no Bhagwandas was acting CJ not the actual CJ of Pakistan), CEC in the history of Pakistan? Any top filmstar singer who is non-Muslim? No. But more than that it is the ongoing oppression and discrimination which has led to the percentage of minorities declining from 20% in West Pakistan (as it was then called) at time of independence to less than 3% now.
ET moderators: when someone does wrong reasoning and your do not print my response it is equally frustrating. @gp65 " Dicrimnation against non-Muslims be it Hindus, Sikhs, Christians is baked into the constitution." Yet, minorities are well represented in the Government and the institutions. Given the ineffectiveness of the Government, the non-state actors are responsible for maltreatment of minorities but not the State, the civil society, or the people at large. All and any can have a niche in Pakistan, even the TTP. Pakistan's very survival is proof enough of its pluralism as the State and the Government lets all to do whatever they like or simply the State cannot control anyone. Pakistan maybe bordering on the lawless but it does not make it any less plural. As far as your comment "Wrong analysis and wrong conclusion," please stop posing as know-it-all. Be more circumspect in your comments.
ET Mods: Wjhen someone draws incorrect conclusions from my post and you do not print my clafification, it is really frustrating. @Raham Dil: " That you get “a laugh” at anything positive that Pakistan has shows your anti-Pakistan attitude."
Wrong analysis and wrong conclusion. I got laught out of your post. I was not laughing at Pakistan the country. My earlier post made it quite clear why I found your post funny. There are many positive things about Pakistan but pluralism is not one of those. Dicrimnation against non-Muslims be it Hindus, Sikhs, Christians is baked into the constitution. The constitution also has determined that Ahmadis are not Muslims. The ongoing discrimnation and oppression of minorities is not hidden and now even Shias have joined the list. On top of that laws against women who constitute 50% of population are also discrimnatory. Calling such a society as one that promotes pluralism lacks credibility.
The PML-N and PTI have the clear mandate from the majority in the land, who want nothin short of Peace in the country which is under threat from both internal and external forces. To tackle them Mr Sharif has announced 'taks' with the Talibans and revision in foreign policy. He hsa no mandate to open the Pandora box fo the french clean up nor for vengence. Being a seasoned politician his task is to restore ''Trust' among the people of Pakistan who had to put up with an impotent PPP for too long. He should also be aware about the waining power of the USA and be conscious that his grand jesture of facilitating their departure on Pakistan highway carries enormous risks, and while John Kerry is ready to sign the surrender deal with the Talibans it is not clear if the Talibans will just let go of the enemy without any retributions. .
Rex Minor
As said, treason charge requires political will, which is not going to come by, so Musharaf has a get out of jail card already. Every other case against him is only a nuisance to him and can also become a nuisance against the govt elect if not played well. Let us not forget,- Musharaf has powerful friends in the US, unlike NS at this moment. In the end, the winner is Musharaf in this drama. NS should forget about Musharaf. NS has more than enough in his plate to chew at the moment and IK is waiting for the crumbs. If it is not already obvious, PPP and PML-N are allies in this political drama.
Taliban is hoping that now NS will give them some concessions and this is where he will be really tested. All other fronts- energy and economy and security- nothing dramatic is going to happen and it all depends on how this new govt strikes a deal in Afghan front.
@Gp65: "Your pluralism ensures freedom? That got a laugh out of me" Pluralism is seen in no one group dominating the State and the Government. That you get "a laugh" at anything positive that Pakistan has shows your anti-Pakistan attitude.
@ Humanity. Your comments are out of context. Pluralism gives freedom as regards representation of all. Killings are an anomoly, good government is needed to stop it.
@Maula Jat:
It is normal for a murderer to return to the site where the murder was committed! It is, however, not normal to find the police guard ready to arrest. Musharf is a security risk for the country within and outside the country. God almight knows about the fate of a persons who ordered the assault on God's House. Let us recall about the purpose of Ibrahim(pbuh) to build a house of God, because this is the place where God listens to the payers of humans!!!!
Rex Minor
@Gp65: What has been seen is that legislation to address the plight of the people even if made is always frustrated by poor or no implementation. The need of the hour is better and more transparent management in order to right the boat and then to go on from there. Informatively the PPP have stated that they would not be a hindrance to progress........ very early in the day to comment on that. Madam the point you are making is well taken but my view is to look at things realistically. So on that note lets close this discussion. Always a pleasure interacting with you.
@Parvez: So I am a little curious : if there is no need to pass legislation - why exactly did 50 million people go out and elect MNAs ? What is the purpose of parliament , if not to pass legislation? And this is not a rhetorical question, I would really like to know since you are convinced no legislation is needed.
To my rather simple mind that understands little about cars other than I put the key in ignition and it goes, your argument is difficult to comprehend. It would appear that a revised tax code which taxes all sources of income is need of the hour in order to raise the tax to GDP ratio in a progressive manner rather than the current regressive overrelianceq on indirect taxes. A witness protection act and other aspects to improve the prosecution rate of terrorists is another thing that one might assume is sorely needed. With schools being closed in Cholistan, hospitals running out of supply and thousands becoming jobless because there is no money to pay for fuel that run power plants, don't you think there is a need to rethink where the budget is directed (national security vs. social security state model) . Do you think such dramatic changes in budget can be implemented without Senate buy-in?
@author When are we going to stop calling the dead politicians (forgetting all the corrupt acts and things they did against us) Shaheeds?
@Gp65: You are talking of a case when a specialised electronic fine tuning is thought necessary for an engine that runs but you want it to purr. Here we are looking at an engine that is coughing badly and in need of an oil, filter and spark plug change something any honest mechanic would do, if the driver asked for it.
Additional legislation is absolutely not required, implementation of simple good governance is what is required.
@Np: Both Khalistan and LTTE were separatist but TTP is not however it wants to impose its version of Islam on the whole of Pakistan or at least where it holds territory. There are other important differences as well. I wished the author instead of just being critical of giving a shot to negotiating would have suggested workable alternatives.
@Abid P. Khan: You have a very valid point............but after calling them ' Ali Baba and his 40 thieves ' and a lot more on TV, he will look stupid and complicit if he does nothing. Of course your counter to that will be............do you think he cares ?? and I would agree with you.
@Khalid Mahmood: Look at how India dealt with the Khalistan movement and Sri Lanka dealt with LTTE.
@Raham Dil: Your pluralism ensures freedom? That got a laugh out of me. Please ask Sikhs, Hindus, Christians, Ahmadis how free they are. Do check with Shias as well.
@Parvez - I did not get the impression that Saroop was advocating a free pass for Musharraf. But I got the impression that he is resigned to it just in the way Ayesha Siddiqa was. I find that surprising. If this PM and this judiciary both of whom have been personal victims do not hold Musharraf accountable for the coup, no army chief will ever be held accountable and future chiefs will be emboldened.
@Raham Dil wrote ' Those who make fun of Pakistan fail to realize the economic diversity. We are not a singe crop economy. And, we do not always take dictation like banana republic’s. Our resilience is remarkable. Our pluralism ensures freedom. From every “disaster” we emerge stronger.'
Our pluralism ensures freedom. Really?
Ask the Shia and Ahmadi Muslims, the Hindus and Chrisitians, the women killed and mutilated for honor, what freedom is ensured to then.
Keep on thumping the self righteous hollow chests, devoid of hearts and humanity. Bijli and 'sharia' are around the corner. But rest assure, darkness will not be lifted unless the noose of a bigoted constitution around the 'resiliant' heads is not severed.
Let the next 5 years long act of bigotry and falsehood in the name of religion be played. Just remember the undeniable truth of how the divine plan operates. No sanctity for God given human rights, no humanity. No humanity, no justice. No justice, no peace. No peace, no light.
The choice is between enlightened and dark mindsets. Put your trust in the Saudi Bijli and and Saudi sharia and say good bye to what ever freedoms the non -TTP/non-KSA Sunnis have carved out for themselves.
Amma yaad ajae gee.
ET please allow response to someone who has written to me. @Parvez: sorry i was unclear. I did not mean legislation to ensure accountability. I meant legislation to govern effectively for the 5 years. If he wants a better governance record than the past government, he will surely have to pass some breakthrough economic legislation. He would have to also get the budgets passed in both houses - budgets that may on occasion be controversial. None of that can be accomplished without PPP support.
Mr.Nawaz Sharif becoming PM through rigged elections must by all means initiate a treason case against Musharraf and all others in any court and also constitute Kargil Commission to find out the truth. The only most important point is that the investigations/ trial should be impartial, fair and transparent. Truth will then come out whether Musharraf is right or Nawaz Sharif and his collaborators. Most likely result will be that it would open the eyes of the people as to who was on the correct path for all times to come. Propaganda will also be exposed.
How exactly should NS deal with TTP? Author should enlighten.
SI, Great as usual . Thanks for being so objective and eloquent. @ water bottle: thanks for the comment, I see the same people who supported mush are staunch supporters go IK. IK is new mush and that will manifest in full colors when and if he is in power.
@Polpot: Those who make fun of Pakistan fail to realize the economic diversity. We are not a singe crop economy. And, we do not always take dictation like banana republic's. Our resilience is remarkable. Our pluralism ensures freedom. From every "disaster" we emerge stronger.
No constructive suggesstion is given on how to deal with the TTP.
@Firaaq: "Do they, perchance, grow bananas in Pakistan??" +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ok if u insist Pakistan is a Mango Republic.
@Parvez: "If Nawaz Sharif even held the looters and plunderers of the last five years accountable and visibly so, he would have performed an admirable task. " . Do you suggest NS should risk these extremely honest gentlemen, to start singing in the court room? For all you know they may get cushy jobs in foreign lands.
@Gp65: Firstly, Mian Sab does not need any new legislation to hold looter accountable. The legislation is there, what will be required is the will to enforce it. Secondly, I did not get the impression that Saroop Ijaz was advocating a ' get out of jail free card ' for Musharraf, in fact I thougth it was the opposite he wanted.
@Bilal: Sir, I am very interested in knowing if any one is writing for Sawaab -ey Daraeen???.
@KAY: Reminds me of the classic definition of a banana republic : " a republic that grows bananas and listens carefully to what the U.S. ambassador has to say". Do they, perchance, grow bananas in Pakistan??
Servants obey masters. Whenever US ambassador meets our politicians (and that is very frequent), he is gathering knowledge for the script to be written and imposed from Washington. Everything else is mere tales.
I like the article and I like the writer for being downright pragmatic and objective as usual in his views and suggestions.
Mr Saroop this is a master piece. Very well written.
Nawaz Sharif himself was abetter and sided with Gen Zia ul Haq in second last coup in Pakistan history. Authority and mandate comes from moral background of a leader not from the fact that he won election with the support of KSA/USA/UK and Taliban (by denying activae participation from left wing secular parties)
The circle would be full if Nawaz Sharif was able to do unto Musharraf as he did unto him. Alas, that will never happen. No section 6, nothing. More likely a safe exit to his freedom.
Sharif wanted PPP to prosecute Musharraf for Treason. Now his Government can file the petition in court to start proceedings. I agree with the author that we need closure on repeated coup's without impunity. The establishment needs to know what Constitutional Government means and this will focus their minds. Jinnah was an expert on Constitutional Law, such that by its practice and application he got the British Empire and the Hindu majority to concede Pakistan. If Nawaz Sharif does not answer the call of the hour, regardless of personal issues, Pakistan will never become a stable democracy.
Musharraf equation: Pakistan First = Me x Myself x I = Musharraf First.
Musharraf holds Sharif in utter contempt for not understanding the game of power and losing as a result. How the tables have turned! But the fix - courtesy the Saudis and military - is in. Just a matter of time before he escapes the judicial system.
Sometimes i think all you ever write is to get attention!
@Parvez: PPP still has majority in Senate and will be necessary for any legislation that Mian Saab wants to push through, so any vendetta/accountability of PPP can be ruled out .
Separately it is unclear why everyone from Ayesha Siddiqa to Saroop Ijaz is advocating a Get out of jail free card for Musharraf? Many of the problems witnessed today can be traced back to Musharraf period.
Nicely argued but the line of action that you suggest Nawaz Sharif should take regarding Musharraf would require a ' bigger ' person to push through, especially at this stage. If Nawaz Sharif even held the looters and plunderers of the last five years accountable and visibly so, he would have performed an admirable task.
Oh my god! You have hurt a lot of Musharraf supporters.
Nonetheless, I guess most Musharraf supporters are now, PTI supporters. Recent converts.
To them, Imran Khan is the new Musharraf.
One who can be very confident, charming, charismatic, dashing, daring, eloquent. Notwithstanding stupid, narrow visioned, ignorant, foolish, brazen and hence a failure.
Musharraf loves to play bridge but has the streak of a poker player who likes to double too often. I guess he called his last double by returning to contest election. It turned out to be a bluff and now the game is up for him. There is the little question of how he is going to pay. The question should not be changed to whether he is going to pay. That is if we have any self respect.