Firstly, let’s take a look at the high turnout factor. Besides being a watershed event in the political history of Pakistan, where the rare occasions for voting had never brought such huge numbers to the polling booths, the turnout was more pronounced for the presence of the elite as well as the educated middle and lower middle class voters, not fervent about voting prior to these elections. The first-time voters, women voters and the overwhelming involvement of the youth are significant milestones that form undeniable pointers for an active and energised future electoral road map in the country. The urban voter ecology can be seen and understood by the nexus between youth mobilisation drawing its strength from the demographic “youth bulge” in the population with around 60 per cent of the population below the age of 30 and fresh links in the chain, including first-time adult voters and women, the female factor before now, almost non-existent in the voters quantum. Voting during these elections came across as more of a collective family affair in its occurrence, although diverse in mandate with each family member voting for the candidate of his or her choice. The fact points to the evolution of “independent thinking” and the “choice factor” carving its place in politico-socio decision making. These two outcomes by themselves are worth any voting exercise.
The youth factor in the population, expected to continue for the next few decades will ensure an effective future workforce presence, their capacities, capabilities and opportunities, however, dependent on the policies of the successive governments in power. The awareness of their very presence, the heightened significance of their role after these elections and the realisation of their strength and force so awakened will be hard to ignore by any future government. This should give enough reason to political parties to be wary of their future performance. The price of incompetence or mismanagement may well be high and with consequences this time around; the terms of accountability though apparently silent but extremely effective in the long term.
Secondly, the envisaged real-time presence of a strong opposition in parliament may be another strong incipient force. Although the PTI has not been able to garner majority vote as it vociferously claimed all along, it has emerged as a solid political presence which can neither be ignored nor undermined as a power to reckon with by the newly formed government and other political players. If the PTI decides to lead the opposition, that it so far is determined to do, it might as well be the inception of a new era of “constructive criticism” in the political framework of the country. Opposition for the sake of opposition or a dummy opposition — without any real effect or influence on the decisions of the elected government — have, so far, been the safe choices of the oppositions we have seen so far. The new government is definitely faced with a new force to weigh its actions against, despite the ramrod capability available at its disposal. For the first time, the opposition may have a real chance to play a positive, constructive and effective role in the political decision-making of the country.
Both factors are wholesome and portend well for Pakistan’s democratic, political and social evolution. They are essential ingredients required for mature, balanced, inclusive and informed decision-making — factors which have been badly missing from the political arena so far.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 17th, 2013.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Is there any particular reason that a number of your OpEd writers also state their college degrees and where they got them. Is this at the behest of ET? Is it meant to legitimize their views, or impress us about the quality writers corralled by ET? Are you catering to a foreign-educated expatriate readership? Any OpEd should be evaluated for what it says, and how it presents the arguments. I would proffer that ET at most present the profession of the author.
Just sayin'.
@Ahsan Raza: It is the number of seats won that count not the total or % votes. There are Baluchistan assembly seats that PML-N has won where only five hundred votes were cast. Even if PTI would have won more % of votes still they would have zero seats in the senate! You know and I know and everybody's dog knows that in its worst day PPP has gotten more seats than PTI in its best day. Being a student of science all my life, I believe in numbers rather than perception and personal likes and dislikes. It is the number of seats won not the total votes that determine the PM and leader of opposition in the NA. Regards, M
The challenges will remain in a democracy and these need to be taken in the stride. The next government will have to continue working towards strengthening democracy. The challenges continue to remain with regard to fighting against terrorism and religious fundamentalism which are the greatest enemies of democracy and reviving an economy that has been passing through a not very good phase. The next five years therefore remain decisive which will determine the future of democracy in Pakistan.
@Mirza PTI got the 18% of the total votes cast. Which places it at the 2nd
" (PTI), which has risen as the second largest political force with its predominant presence in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) as the leading party and also the mainstay of opposition at the center." Based upon the election results PTI cannot even take leader of opposition's post in NA. In KPK it has to include the likes of JI, independents and Sherpao to barely form govt. Where is the force? NS can form govt in Punjab and center without compromising with the likes of Sherpao who was Mush's interior minister. PPP can make govt in Sindh without any compromise if it wants, yet you only see the third party who could not form govt in any province no matter how small on its own as the victorious! No wonders people have no respect for Pakistan Customs. It is not surprising that IK and independent EC are going after 5 more NA seats (which should not mean much for a third party) to gain the status of opposition leader.
well written i agree with you