Overseas Pakistanis and the victimised parties are concerned by the increasing plight of those who support democracy and the liberal way of life. They have been protesting and pleading for protection and calling for the establishment of a level playing field.
While strikes and protests are frequently being observed in Quetta, Karachi and Peshawar, a similar rally was held outside the Pakistan High Commission in London on April 29. The British media, too, is not oblivious to the dangerous situation and doubts are being cast about the legitimacy of the elections. Some are even describing it all as deliberate pre-poll rigging to defeat liberal elements and secure victory at gunpoint for the obscurantist forces and their supporters.
The three parties most affected by the violence are seeking a common strategy to secure themselves, in what they describe as premeditated terrorism to keep them out and their voters away from polls, threatening democratic transition in Pakistan. The daily acts of terrorism have made it clear that it is more of an ideological war — a war between progressive forces and those who want to Talibanise Pakistan. More so, it is a battle between liberal forces that want to revert to the Quaid-e-Azam’s egalitarian Pakistan and save it from being captured by the Taliban.
While one can understand the predicament of the liberal forces that are undeterred so far and bravely facing the bloody onslaught, it might soon also be time for others who continue to run with the democratic hare while hunting with the Taliban hounds. These short-sighted elements — blinded by their pursuit of possible immediate electoral gains — do not realise what could ultimately be in store for them in the longer run.
History is a great teacher for those who are willing to learn a lesson from it. To carry the point home, it needs to be realised urgently that today, the liberal elements are targets and those opposing them could win at the polls.
What matters is to understand the endgame of the Taliban. It is not just victory against those who oppose them ideologically. The Taliban want to capture the state of Pakistan, first by defeating their opponents and then by having pliable elements in power who could pave the way for them to attain their ultimate goal of converting Pakistan into a Talibanised island cut off from rest of the world.
Our political leaders and all others who matter must stand up and speak out before the Taliban take over. Their strategy is self-evident. They are trying to prove that the state of Pakistan is toothless and they can bulldoze their ideology and impose it as an alternative to democracy. It is better late than never.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 3rd, 2013.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Oye Yaro !!! I can not explain but why ALLAH gave all the CHAMCHAAY to Pakistan?
At best we can look forward "Never" as option of "late" is nearly gone. Collectively we have to reap what was sown, what was put in curriculum to produce pure Islamic souls and develop model Muslims in this so-called, self-proclaimed Fortress of Islam. Its our turn not just to taste but digest the bitter fruit we chose for Afghanistan and Kashmir. There is least we would even repent at our blunders.
@ toticaling
Sorry sir, democracy is not support of the masses. This is superficial. A dictator can also have support of the masses or a theocracy or something else. Democracy is much much more than that.
What is definition of secular,liberal parties? If we go by High commissioner's analogy and of so many columns written on the same theme,than liberal secular parties would mean inefficient,corrupt,apathetic,mediocre,ruthless and selfish group of elite,who ruled Pakistan in last five years with disastrous consequences. Is his exellency defending this elite. Turkey had undergone similar change,people were ruled by pseudo secular,liberal parties who were corrupt to their bones,finally people got fed up and brought the right wing party,which has turned it into economic powerhouse.His exellency,you need some rest,winds of change have already sweapt Pakistan from Karachi to the Hindu Kush,you have to be in Pakistan to feel the heat,unfortunately you have never been in Pakistan in last two decades or so.
@BruteForce: Implement SHARIAH !!!! are you serious, Brute Force ji ?
Will not such a plan merit a free and fair referundum ???
Does the present situation show any hope of anything * FREE, FAIR AND HONEST*
What would be the advantages of the Shariah ?
Are there not different sects in Pakistan who swear by diverse interpretation of the Shariah ?
one one hand we hv taliban on the other we hv so called liberals............ news for mr wajid this time ppl r going for the third option............ so pls enjoy ur long stay in london...............
I don't why Pakistanis, like the Author, are so scared of Sharia. Isn't that Jinnah wanted too?
Implement Sharia all over Pakistan and you will erase the raison d'etre of the Taliban.
Sharia was given to all Muslims and as an Indian it concerns me why Muslims of Pakistan, the followers of Islam, are not implementing Sharia, the gift given by the supreme one(only one), given for the entire humanity but specifically for Muslims?
I really hope Sharia rules Pakistan. Bad mouthing it an insult to Muslims all over the world, especially Jinnah.
@Ahmed: Sir you may have your perception about the guy as worst or pro zardari ( corrupt) but he has painted a picture, raised questions and the probable implications of attacks carried out against 3 parties mainly with a particular motive. . Either his observations are to be confronted with supportive evidences, confront his apprehensions with logic. when we can not confront with logic we shout, we indulge in personal attack and we( try to ) over power using muscles or adoptingg violent measures and this is well established fact . No offence please
He also chewed "illaichi" as he spoke on many ITV shows--an utterly revolting sight!
@Ahmed: This is the guy who when asked to come to Pakistan to appear for hearings refused, claiming ill health or some such excuse...................zero credibility and an excellent choice for a senior PPP-Z person.
@Vikash: strange statement by you: "there are other systems which can give better results if supported by the masses" If anything is supported by masses that is called democracy. Perhaps you did not mean what you wrote. Elections show what people want and who they support. The surveys made should not be given that much importance when the 'Truth' of elections results are due on 11. May. There are many wrongs in Pakistan, but holding free elections is not one of them.
A great Op Ed by an experienced journalist and diplomat. The job of a diplomat is to support Pakistan and its team from day one. You did that to our cricketers even if they were criminals. You would have been criticized if you did not. So it was damned if you and damned if you don't. I can appreciate that being a paid govt servant you had to go with the govt directions. I don't think that most Pakistani elite realize that they are playing with fire while supporting Taliban endorsed parties. Fortunately the elections are not decided by the few elites but the poor masses. The only way to defeat the rightwing onslaught is to mobilize all the voters who sit at their hands and do not show up. In addition the three coalition parties should make seat adjustment right away. What would MQM have to lose if they announce their full support to PPP and ANP candidates especially where they are not contesting? Similarly ANP and PPP should do the same in KPK and Baluchistan. One of these party leaders had to take the lead and show some leadership.
why shove down democracy down the throats of unwilling people? A recent pew survey shows that only 26% Pakistanis prefer democracy.
Democracy is no magic wand. It will only prosper when the majority supports it or else its going to fail.
there are other systems which can give better results if supported by the masses. So, think it over and go for something which suits general mindset.
I did not hear a peep out of him when 9,000 people has been killed in Karachi during the last 5years, how could one forget what happened on May12,2007 when mayhem was taking place and Musharaff raised his fist in Islamabad and told the gathering that they will know now who is in-charge in Karachi. The ones called themselves in-charge ruled Karachi with violence and now they are complaining violence by others. The writer is hitting hard on Taliban and it seems he is placating to the West specially the UK and USA, well, when he is asked to vacate , he will be accommodated either in UK or USA by their respective governments because he so much anti-Taliban. Who is he fooling, not us.
This is a shabby piece at best! No, the Taliban are not about to capture state power, your suggestion is ludicrous in the extreme and reflects an utter lack of understanding of the geo-political frame in which Pakistan operates. You think the US will sit back and watch the Taliban takeover a nuclear Muslim state of 190 million? What can you say when idiocity begins to masquerade as strategic thought, what can you say? Don't you ever exchange notes with the likes of Ambassador Rehman, Sen. Raza Rabbani and others of their ilk before spewing out non-sense that in a less tolerant political environment would render you the not-so-enviable status of a juvenile delinquent.
This is the guy who when the match fixing fiasco came up, he came to the entrance of the high commission with a cigar in hand and declared that the boys have told him that they have not done anything. This is the guy who was caught doing Zardari's hanky panky work in Switzerland by getting rid of important documents. This is the guy who cannot communicate well but was representing the country in the UK!