Having said which, and knowing two wrongs do not make a right and all that, let me say to those who are now propagating this on the internet, particularly my course-mates on our course discussion board: Gentlemen, recall that another army dictator, Ziaul Haq, elevated an avowed enemy of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s, Maulvi Mushtaq, to be the chief justice of the Lahore High Court, a post that Bhutto had refused to give him, to preside over Bhutto’s trial.
A criminally wrong move ab ignitio, for the High Court is a court of appeal, not a trial court. A move made, obviously, to deprive Bhutto of one court of appeal. Recall too, sirs, the way in which Maulvi conducted himself in that kangaroo court: the slights and the abuse that he aimed at the former president and prime minister of this poor country on a daily basis, even going to the extent of asking the accused if he was Muslim and then remarking that Bhutto was a Muslim in name only, a remark so very injudicious that even the loaded-against-Bhutto Supreme Court of Anwarul Haq expunged these remarks of Maulvi’s.
I write what I do for the information of the hundreds of thousands of young people who are alleged to have been energised this time around to make their presence felt in these elections: young people who know jot about this country’s democratic leaders’ travails and tribulations under army dictators and their henchmen. And the personal hate and rancour that informed the agenda of these dictators.
So, I say to the Commando’s supporters: understand that whatever is going on is due to the kind ministrations of the people you hold in high esteem; and that what goes around comes around. Personally, I abhor unfair behaviour towards anyone, and will always stand up for those who are dealt with unfairly.
Which brings me to the matter of the Commando wishing to go to Dubai to meet his dear mother, a lady I have admired since long for being the working woman that she was. May she have good health and may these days of peril for her son go easy on her. Indeed, may the Commando himself stay safe.
But we could all do without Ahmad Raza Kasuri’s histrionics on live TV when he pretended to cry, dry-eyed, in front of the Supreme Court, pleading for Musharraf to be allowed to go to Dubai to see his mother. May I remind Kasuri of the time when his leader (until 1976, when Kasuri stood in line for a PPP ticket for the ’77 elections despite having registered a murder case against ‘Saab’ — his word for ZAB — in 1974!) was the victim of judicial murder and his wife and daughter were not even allowed to attend his funeral rites by an army dictator.
May I remind Kasuri of the fact that Nawaz and Shahbaz and (the late) Abbas Sharif were not allowed to come back to the country by another army dictator, the Commando himself, to bury their father? May I remind Kasuri of the fact that one Asif Ali Zardari, now the president of the country, was not allowed to visit his mother when she was gravely ill because he was in the Commando’s prison? What goes around, sirs, comes around, remember that.
As to the Commando being allowed to go to Dubai to visit his mother, I am all for it: he has already made enough of a fool of himself by first coming back and then by his cowardly behaviour. If he doesn’t come back to face the charges against him, good riddance: he could be tried and sentenced in absentia if found guilty. The country could very easily do without him and his malevolent influence, now blaming x and then y for his own actions.
As an aside, and because the Commando has himself accused Shaukat (Shortcut) Aziz of triggering the 2007 emergency, our courts would do well to indict him too and issue Red Warrants for his arrest on charges of treason and worse. Serves him right for first doing the Commando’s bidding and then ditching his boss.
As to the Commando being delusional about the amount of support he enjoyed, whilst I know that my platoon-mate Brigadier Abdul Haque went to the Karachi airport despite his bad back (respect!), could someone enlighten us as to how many of the “over 150 Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals” who gathered in a five-star facility in Islamabad in support of the Commando a year or so ago, went to the Karachi airport to receive him, or were present in court when he appeared, or protested outside his house against his arrest? Precious few, I’ll bet.
Now then, while this little diversion provided by the Commando’s arrival and subsequent antics was quite hilarious, it has also led some to think that the elections might be postponed due to the flurry of judicial activity generated. Additional fuel for this theory is provided by the deteriorating security situation in the country with the TTP trying to influence the elections by threatening to, or actually carrying out acts of extreme terror against the MQM, the PPP and the ANP.
Now then, whilst it is absolutely unfair that the JI, the PTI, the PML-N and Maulana Fazl’s JUI run open campaigns while the three others cannot, it is imperative that the elections are held on schedule so that the winning party/combination too face the problem presented by the seemingly all-powerful TTP. It is only then that they will understand the magnitude of the problem.
All Pakistan must get together to rid this country of the murdering terrorists, otherwise this country is done for.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 26th, 2013.
COMMENTS (41)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Muhammad Musa Khan: Where is the contract for allowance of drones? Have you seen it? Can you prove that the strikes that were carried out in Musharraf's time did not kill TTP terrorists? Lastly, what was stopping Kamran Shaffi sahib's PPP government and now the caretaker government from halting these strikes?
Why just blame Musharraf, Khan sahib? In Musharraf's time, there were less than 10 strikes, how about the hundreds since then?
@Brig Harwant Singh (Retd): ” Those who live by the sword , die by the sword” . And that goes to prove that MK Gandhi was an Ahimsa Warrior.
" Those who live by the sword , die by the sword"
@Abid P. Khan: Indeed!
@author I love your articles. This is why I visit the Tribune. Please continue writing.
@nadeem: The link nowhere states/suggests that the alluded Musharraf statement was made in regard to the Sui rape. Anyway, Musharraf did make that statement and I still believe it was against the backdrop of the Mukhtara Mai episode. Such was Musharraf's "enligtened moderation," which actually is a phrase loaned from Henry Kissinger.
@v: "Ab ignitio’? What is that? A spell from Harry Potter? That should read ‘ab initio’ " . No, it is not. This is how you start the Water Kit Car.
@Mirza: - very true. TTP is a monster which allows the political parties to ride him to help reach the destination of power but will not allow them to get down. journey of the political parties to power riding on the monster also makes the monster stronger The moment rider tries to get down he will be attacked viciously to eat out .Army has tasted it..
@Peace Lover:
No, I was referring to Dr Shazia Khalid case at Sui: http://www.petitiononline.com/SuiRape/petition.html
Parvez Musharraf left the country after nine months of resigning as president also with a guard of honor. Nobody dared file a case against him. He came back with his own will and submitted himself to justice. Nobody wants to arrest him even upon courts order. We will see what author has to say once the drama of courts is over.
with all due respect Mr. Shafi had this "what goes around comes around" analysis been done by a street corner intellectual i would ve tolerated it, but this shallow analysis coming from your side makes me think twice about your intellectual depth.
@nadeem Musharraf's statement that you are alluding to probably was made in reference to the Mukhtara Mai episode?
@WB: People's Party is great in creating myths of martyrdom.
@Cobrajock: How apt!!!
What Musharraf will get only time will tell but ZAB got what he deserved because of political atrocities committed under him were done by an allegedly democratically elected govt. We all know he was not a champion of democracy otherwise he would yielded power to Shaikh Mujeeb ur Rehman.
@nadeem: couldn't agree more ... as for Musharraf, the way he betrayed Pakistan through allowance of drones, through NRO, he should be severely punished, he was nothing more than a power hungry person for his own sake.
I agree with KS thesis but disagree with the title, what goes around comes around! If that is the case, then those carrying out these heinous acts of terror against the people of Pakistan can also be considered to be right. What is wrong is wrong, and what is right is right! Popular sentiment, hatred or biases should not dictate our judgement. Mush was wrong on many a front but he did not act in isolation and if we ignore that aspect then we are fooling ourselves. If we are to crucify Mush absolving others of complicity then that would be a travesty of justice just to please a few. Lets start with Asgher Khan case for a change, bring the Generals and politicians to court, run a parallel court for Mush and company! That can never happen in this country, so lets be honest and bold enough to admit that this is a personal vendetta carried out against Musharraf by a certain Northern segment of this country!
The saying ' an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind '...........holds good here. Comparing ZAB's shenanigans with those of Musharraf's is a debatable subject but comparing the treatment received by ZAB and now being received by Musharraf , you have made a valid point.
@v: You are right: a slip of the keyboard!! Thank you for pointing it out...:)
Quite frankly I am sick of hearing and reading of ZAB's "martydom", just get over it. He nationalized Pak industry while promoted fuedal Sindhi mindset and then rigged the 1977 elections not to mention ordered the hit on Sher Pao.
Why are you so focussed on Musharraf? What about Zardari and his men?
The above article substantiate three points:-1) The CJ and judiciary of today is not 'impartial or independent as being claimed and touted but as bad and biased as before. 2) Treatment being meted out to Musharraf is totally wrong and unfair but could be justified for the reason that the same had happened in the distant or near past to the other leaders. 3) Musharraf has shown one additional trait of strong character and a great leader ie to accept responsibility of his actions and be ready to face them.He did it absolutely voluntarily. The out come of his predicaments should also be the same ie massive increase in Musharraf's popularity and his triumphent return. True, What goes around comes around!
If mush is to be blamed and tried then what about the entire lot of politicians and judges who supported his actions. I remember, more than fifty percent Pak nation admired the 1999 action of Mush. Will we punish them who gave him encouragement to repeat it in 2007?? Mush case will draw division in our society. Let Mush go, afterall he has no place now in our country.
A man of principles the writer KS is. Thanks ET for offering such Op Ed. I agree with almost everything except the end. The rightwing terrorist killers are not going to bother the newly elected rightwing govt. Their task is to convert Pakistan into Talibanistan and each rightwing leader is similar in ideology as TTP. They are not going to create problems for Sharif and IK for the freedom they would gain by their coming to power. Why Taliban only killing in Sindh, KPK and Baluchistan and not Punjab ruled by Sharif? They would treat Pakistan just like Sharif's Punjab.
"As to the Commando being allowed to go to Dubai to visit his mother, I am all for it: he has already made enough of a fool of himself by first coming back and then by his cowardly behaviour. If he doesn’t come back to face the charges against him, good riddance: he could be tried and sentenced in absentia if found guilty. The country could very easily do without him and his malevolent influence, now blaming x and then y for his own actions." So using the pretext of visiting his mother, you believe he should be given a chance to escape justice. How can you so casually gloss over the serious implications of letting Musharraf escape, a subverter of Constitution, especially in 2007 when he was absolute ruler? Since late your articles seem to be taking contradictory positions. So what is causing you to change your stances? Clarify your own thinking to yourself then write.
I can see a wider intellectually dishonest smirk.
There are very few journalists in Pakistan who could stand up and be counted, Mr.Shafi is one of them. This article is informative and to the point, yes, what goes around comes around.I do agree with you that the judiciary should be very careful and see to it that Musharraf gets a fair trial although he has never granted fairness to others except his minions when he was ruling the country. Higher judiciary should prove to the world that it is a world class judiciary and make Pakistanis to be proud of it.Mr.Kasuri is a turn coat and the people know it well. He appeared on Public Broadcasting Service when he was foreign minister, this guy was singing the praises of his boss like a parrot, I called in and asked him 2 questions. One: what type of government Pakistan had, Presidential or Parliamentary.Second question : Did Musharraf take over and deposed a sitting elected prime minister with the barrel of the gun. Kasuri's answer was that the caller does not know what was he talking about, and then the host start asking him the same questions.How did he become a foreign minister beats me.
Great article! People who support Musharraf seriously need to understand what dictators and coup-makers symbolize. Musharraf is not being tried for the way he ran the government but the way he became the government (by the way Musharraf government's performance would also not get the passing marks but let's not digress). The point being that arguments for Musharraf on the pattern "Musharraf government did this and that" are nonsensical in the given context.
Kamran Shafi, you are a loveable son of this country. I salute your insight and integrity.
One can only agree with this writing. In spite of the point that Mush is probably not guilty, but neither were the civilians of the past.
'Ab ignitio'? What is that? A spell from Harry Potter? That should read 'ab initio'
@Ahad:
I don't agree with him in regards to Musharraf. I have read a news that some elements from foreign sources tries to exile him from Pakistan but Musharraf refuses to leave the country until the court cases are done and he does not prove himself as innocent.
Another excellent piece!
Spot on Mr. Shafi. Glad someone finally made some parallel to the hue & crying going on now with Musharraf's socalled "unfair" treatment and how my leader Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was treated and then murdered
I think the writer might have overlooked the fact that ZAB (whose wife and children were prevented from attending his funeral) and Nawaz Sharif (who was not allowed to attend to his father's funeral) were mere 'bloody civilians'. Generals cannot, of course, be made to suffer such inconveniences.
Whilst the Pak army is in your bulls-eye, pray write something about the utter pain expressed by those unlucky to live near palaces such as Bilawal House due to cordoned off roads. Isn't it an utter human rights abuse by Zardari and his ilk?
Agree with everything except the point against Shaukat Aziz, for one the burden of proof is on the accuser. If he says there is a secret letter, let it be seen.
Secondly does anyone really think Shaukat Aziz triggered the emergency ?? He served a dictator who was the ultimate decision maker. The prime minister also functions on the advice of the cabinet, the cabinet of that time should also go to jail then. So should army and bureaucratic personnel for following illegal orders ? Not sure where this will end. The buck stops at the top, and the top is Musharraf.
For the first time i would agree with mr.Shafi..