According to recent estimates, only 58 per cent of 180 million Pakistanis can read or write. Nearby Sri Lanka, despite surviving a violent civil war, has managed to educate 98 per cent of its population, whereas India, despite being the second most populated country in the world, has an impressive 74 per cent literacy rate.
In Pakistan, however, the few that are educated seem to be divided on the basis of gender, ethnicity and influence. For instance, Balochistan stands as the least educated province and women, who form more than half of our total population, are largely illiterate, especially in the rural areas of the country.
The emphasis on education is important because illiteracy plays into the hands of corrupt politicians who try to win votes on the basis of affiliations and biradari systems, rather than on their contributions to the nation.
Lessons are to be learned from history. During the Dark Ages of Europe, the Church purposely kept the people uneducated so as to continue its influence without facing any accountability. One dreads that the pattern in Pakistan is similar, where the ruling elite keeps the people uneducated in order to exploit them for their selfish motives. A glimpse of the budget allocation on the education sector is reflective of this fact.
Closely linked to education is public awareness. The mass media in Pakistan has made remarkable progress in recent years. It has played a pivotal role in keeping the public informed and bringing the ruling elite under the umbrella of accountability and scrutiny. However, the achievements have been far from ideal. There are still certain sections of the media that cater to the demands of a select few, thus influencing people to formulate biased opinions. With the elections looming, the media’s role is of utmost importance. Considering the fact that the majority of our population is uneducated, the votes cast will be largely influenced by the mass media. It is imperative that the media portrays an unbiased opinion through print and television programmes so that the public can make an informed decision.
Otherwise, the next elected government may continue to push the country towards an abyss of turmoil and underdevelopment through self-serving policies that continue to enslave the people. For the right people to be elected, our people need to be informed and educated. This is where the real challenge lies for the country. Let us hope that come May 11, 2013, votes are cast not on the basis of sects, castes, biradaries and political affiliations but on the basis of a thorough, logical and comparative analysis of the contesting politicians.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 18th, 2013.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
"in the Indian experience it is the educated who do not vote while the poor/uneducated do and make very rational choices."
You are only half correct. While the poor/uneducated vote in larger numbers, they don't necessarily make rational choices. The poor and illiterate are easily manipulated by the corrupt politicians by bribing them with gifts and/or getting them to focus on narrow issues such as caste, religion etc.
@Nadir: best analysis.... agreed fully with you on this matter.... infact these so called LITERATES are hurting the democracies... ....they elect corrupt politicians by NOT voting...
Poor uneducated or semi educated Hindus defeated BJP Party (India) who was supported by rich middle class "Educated Hindus". Religion did not matter either in the latest Bihar election where Educated semi educated and illiterate Hindus elected Muslim representatives in State assembly. Do not underestimate this mass of people that forms majority in both countries.
In pak o hind eductaed classes are more dangerous than uneducated peoples they have divided us in ethanic and reliegous pilitics and result we can see in karachi, sindh, kp baluchistan.
This situation prevailed in rural areas mostly while urban areas are not exempted as well. We have to raise our voice to educate the people so they will be able to cast vote by their way. The current system hijacked the minds of people due to poverty. 1st provide them bread to the people so they feel free. Our people think about the bread and butter 1st then any other thing. For example if i don't have any thing to eat then how come i get my kid admitted in school. Every poor person aims good education and better jobs for his kids but if he is not in a position to fulfill their basic needs then it would be impossible.
@Nadir: the educated participate because they have made themselves able to. Providing education facilitates individuals in participating in a healthy environment for the overall good of the nation. What good is the "wisdom" of the uneducated if he/she cant participate in the overall good of the nation. IF the educated few have been able to take advantage of the mass uneducated in pakistan it is largely due to the latters disconcern in improving their state of living. Read IQBAL 's poetry for a bit of insight. Secondly its true that not all the people of every county make an informed analytical decision but that doesnt mean that it shouldnt be done! Education FACILITATES wisdom, doesnt hinder it in any way. So what is the fuss all about against education ???? The comments of most people seem like a case of Complete Misunderstandings. Very well written article.
In democratic states who have provided ecomonic and social independence to their citizens,electoral process is an exercise of freewill of the individuals .In countries like Pakistan ,where successive governments have miserably failed to do this,assuming that electoral process is representative of free will of the people is blatantly disingenous. Now the solution is not to pack up the democracy ,but to deliver the the essentials of it i.e: social and economic independence,and education is fundamental part of this. With gradual improvement in these parametes elections will progressively become more representative of the free will of the people.
" .... illiteracy plays into the hands of corrupt politicians ...." "For the right people to be elected, our people need to be informed and educated"
So how did Pakistan's educated classes cheer every military takeover? And do the military officers who overthrew every civil govt. belong to the "educated classes" or not?
In every democratic country people vote based on purely local issues. And that requires only proactive awareness - which is present in abundance by the illiterate, since they live on the edge.
With respect to the example of India, democracy was never less secure in India when the literacy rate was 25%, and is not more secure now that it is 75%. Just because a poor person can now read does not mean that he/she will hand over their independence of mind to the media.
You don't have to read, in any case, in order to communicate, Mr Khan. The spoken word will do better, in fact. Tour some democratic countries during elections - you'll see all candidates wielding mikes in live meetings, not writing out leaflets in an office.
Democracy will take forever to come to Pakistan - even the fundamentals are not understood by the persons who hold control of the country's systems.
@Nadir: wow,all very well to give examples of developed countries ,but in pakistan context is slightly different .Education /literacy may not have direct influence on people's choice in the election ,but it has an indirect link. People in Paksitan who are illiterate also tend to be the ones who are economically and socially deprived. Now a person who does not own the land under his feet and roof over his head,how can he have an opinion in his head ,that is his own. This is the differnce between Pakistan and US/UK.
In most of the Pakistan's ward, community who give vote is itself not educated enough to differentiate good and bad. In nutshell they don't even look at the big picture who they are electing. Before polling in their votes, I don't think they even put the electable on any yardstick. Uneducated people elect uneducated/depraved/incompetent politicians and these politicians form incompetent cabinet/assembly & govt.
Totally agree with the author. This would apply to India too. Uneducated / illiterate folks produce sub-standard leaders as we witness in our Lok Sabha...
I came to gave the author a piece of my mind and was so delighted to see that Nadir and others have said what I wanted more eloquently than I could have. I just want to add one thing. If anything, uneducated people in our villages make much more rational decisions. They vote for tangible benefits they would receive instead of the so called educated class, brought up on propaganda against politicians and sold on the empty slogans of change, caught in the utterly nonsensical web of hero worship. The worst thing about these educated people is that they think they are better than the common man, just because they have a degree. During my university days, out of 1500 or so peers I had in my engineering university, political intelligence or rationality was something I rarely saw. The same imbeciles now spout utter gibberish on facebook page make me wish only uneducated people should be allowed to vote: P
@Nadir, you made my day. Bravo!
Pakistan has been a victim of its elites not the poor uneducated masses. No uneducated person ever helped the worst terrorists in the world and two timed the nation and the world.
On the contrary, in the Indian experience it is the educated who do not vote while the poor/uneducated do and make very rational choices.
Get rid of this bias specially if you are talking sustainable development.
the author:: please don't link the literacy with wisdom. The Op ed is challenging The wisdom of poor and illiterate people. which is unfair/ incorrect. It is the media people ( well educated) who are controlled by elite (owner of the media channels) for biased information/manipulation in favor of vested interest..
Just another elitist article. Nadir sums up the counter arguments very well. In support, I will add some additional data points: all 19 involved in 9/11 had very good education! So did electorate of united states and it supported invasion of Iraq based on fabrications! Education without proper leadership, ethics and governance is just a license to cheat and hoodwink.
An illiterate person may not know to read or write, but they surely know right from wrong!
This trash gets circulated every time there's an election imminent: the people of Pakistan can't be trusted with voting for the "right" candidates because they're illiterate. It is equal parts wrong and dangerously close to suggesting that democracy can't work in Pakistan and so we need some other form of governance (who else but the khakis).
For screwing things up, the people threw the PML-Q out in 2008, and the PPP is about to get a thumping in a few weeks. Where is the research showing illiterate voters pick the "wrong" candidate? Where is the data that shows democracy doesn't work in illiterate countries, or that it works any better in educated countries? Trotting out just one fact about our literacy rate and then not even breaking that number down with any real thoroughness is not enough.
Come back with more data to back up your position and we can have a conversation about this. Till then, you just sound like one other voice out of the cacophony of voices clamoring for undemocratic change so Pakistanis can be saved from themselves.
While the efficacy of literacy and public awareness cannot be discounted in choosing responsible legislators, these two characteristics alone are not the harbinger of an institutionalized democratic setup.
The high literacy rates in Tajikistan (99.7%), Uzbekistan (99.3%), and Turkmenistan (98.8%) have not been able to augur a democratic dawn in those totalitarian states. Zimbabwe (91%) is a basket case. Qatar (96.3%), UAE (90%), and Saudi Arabia (86.6%) are absolute monarchies bordering on being police states. Russia’s (99.6%) ‘Democracy’ has a long way to go to be truly called a democracy. Both Hitler and Mussolini were elected by a fairly literate populace.
Pakistani masses, given a free choice, have always made the right decision. Their choice in 1970 to elect Mr. Bhutto in West Pakistan and Mr. Mujibur Rehman in erstwhile East Pakistan with overwhelming majorities were both excellent choices if the non-democratic forces were not successful in derailing the democratic results. Mr. Mujibur Rehman would have made an excellent Prime Minister and would have been able to adroitly keep the dictatorial-minded Mr. Bhutto in check and you would have seen a progressive and dynamic Pakistan, which could have been the envy of the world. Just keep your military away from intervening every so many years and you will do just fine; literacy or no literacy.
With the General Elections coming up, the author has raised a very good and most timely issue that needs due consideration and deliberations by the ET readers.
An other unedited crappy piece by ET! What has illiteracy to do with democracy ?
@ Nadir, excellent comment. This article is another proof that our educated class is no better than illiterate people.
I am not sure where you get the figure of literacy level of 58% in Pakistan. I understand, Mushraff and Choudary Shujaat changed the definition of literacy to one being able to write a signature - rather than the typical grade 8 and above.
The author should be aware that PTI is the only party that has developed a complete comprehensive plan to take Pakistan to full literacy by 2025.
Plan was developed by Imran Khan and global scholar Dr Azeem Ibrahim.
http://insaf.pk/News/tabid/60/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/15617/PTI-unveils-multi-pronged-plan-to-take-Pakistan-to-full-literacy-by-2025.aspx
@Nadir I do agree there is absolutely no link between education/literacy and election. Otherwise, Jinnah won’t get a vote in 1946 when there were more illiteracy among Muslim communities.
This is yet another example of stereotyping and misinformation. Who says the illeterate do not know what's in their own interests and are easily swayed by biradari*? * Similarly, who says educated people make better decisions? Across the globe educated people have championed dictatorships, voted for racists, fascists, neo-nazis, pro-slavery parties etc. In Pakistan, military dictators are championed by affluent foreign educated people, while peasants and farmers bear the brunt of police heavy handedness as they take on the interests of the powers that be.
Please do tell me in which country in the world do people solely vote on the basis of comparative analysis of political parties position? The Republicans still struggle to gain the black and hispanic vote in America. The Tories get no votes in Scotland due to Thatchers legacy or in the North of England, and struggle to gain any votes amongst migrants. Perhaps these illiterate voters in Scotland should pick up a party manifesto rather than voting along ideological lines and perceptions based on a leader from 30 years ago, right?
Generation after generation of upper middle class, Oxbridge graduates get voted into parliament, while election after election, different political dynasties get voted in in the US.
Your assumption that illiterate people are uninformed and dont know whats best for the is flawed. They are rational actors who make choices like anyone else in their best interest. Just becase their choices do not line up with yours, doesnt make their choices inferior.