First, Lady Thatcher was a person of principles. Whether you agreed with her or not, you knew what she stood for and almost nothing could change her mind from what she resolutely believed in (not without thought and investigation). While everyone remembers her famous “this lady is not for turning” comment, one statement by her has been resonating with me since her death. Lady Thatcher one said: “If you just set out to be liked, you would be prepared to compromise on anything at any time, and you would achieve nothing.” And this is the crux of the problem in Pakistan. Politics in Pakistan is one of “liking” the leaders and there is little debate on policy. People vote not because Nawaz Sharif has a better economic policy, or because Imran Khan is sound on defence, but mostly on how much they “like” the person, mainly without much critical thought.
I was further struck by her comments on “consensus politics”, a familiar buzzword in Pakistan these days. In Pakistan, politicians see consensus as something of an achievement. However, speaking in Australia in 1981, Thatcher said: “To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies in search of something in which no one believes, but to which no one objects — the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved, merely because you cannot get agreement on the way ahead.” Doesn’t this quote aptly explain our politics of the last several years? In the name of “consensus”, all specific policies have been abandoned and the country left afloat with random ideas which no one owns. It is time to change.
Secondly, Baroness Thatcher believed in the free market. While I agree that some form of government regulation and support is needed, I do believe that she was right that the market should take its own decisions within a certain framework. In her time as prime minister, she privatised several state-owned organisations simply because the government did not have the ability to properly run them. As time has shown, privatisation not only saved these firms from bankruptcy but also improved efficiency and productivity. Just imagine if we privatise a number of the state-owned giants in Pakistan, like Pakistan Steel, Railways, Wapda, etc. Given the example of the successful de-regulation of the PTCL, similar positive changes could easily come in those organisations and for once, we might have trains running in Pakistan and maybe even get some electricity! Her reforms in opening up the City and allowing council house ownership were decisions which led to a great boom, and are policies that should be followed.
Thirdly, and ultimately, Lady Thatcher’s policies were based on self-responsibility. Having worked her way up through sheer hard work, she strongly believed in individual responsibility and work. Speaking in 1987 she said: “And, you know, there’s no such thing as society. There are individual men and women and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look after themselves first. It is our duty to look after ourselves and then, also, to look after our neighbours.” This is the simplest, yet the most fitting way, of understanding society and how it works. No grand plans will work, unless individuals are empowered and can take the responsibility of first changing their lives and then of others. Pakistanis are very good at “passing the buck”, blaming others for their misery, and we generally shirk from taking responsibility. However, without personal responsibility and action, no amount of good governance can improve the lot of the people and the country.
Lady Thatcher is no longer with us, but her ideals, sense of purpose, strength of character and her simple yet critical and accurate assessments, will always remain with us. I just hope that we Pakistanis, leaders as well as the people, can learn from her.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 16th, 2013.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
If you have 45 minutes to spare try and watch Thatcher's Soviet TV interview - first time a Western leader was allowed to talk unedited to the Soviet people. The Soviet journalist have subsequently admitted they were instructed to ask her tough questions designed to embarrass and defeat her - they failed. First time the Soviet people learned that their nation was the aggressor having more missiles/nukes than any other country and had initiated intermediate missiles before any other country. A striking embarrassment for the Soviet leadership. Many argue that Thatcher's performance was the seed that started Glasnost which revolutionized the Soviet Union.
if anyone Know about PTV's Anchor Mr Mustansir Tarar? plz give me his contact Detail. i have some Historic Question,plzzzz
Thatchers funeral will cost tax payers £10 mil.. Even in her death she continues to steal from the working class
For the real face of Thatcher watch what her free countrymen think -- Watch it http://couchtripper.com/forum2/page.php?page=6
This is why I say we have no liberals ... The real liberals in UK are thrashing her, her policies and the money UK Govt. is spending on her funeral.
@author You are obviously impressed by MT. On the plus side she dealt with the chaos created by unions in industry and framed effective laws. On the negative side, she created a yob culture and divided the society between haves and have nots and imposed 'Poll Tax'. She was too arrogant and autocratic and was thrown out by her own party. It is also telling that on her demise some people, sadly celebrated and had parties. In declaring her the 'Greatest female politician' you are ignoring those who came before her and had a greater understanding of the need of their nations and their people. Golda Meir and Indra Gandhi certainly had a greater impact on the world scene. I cannot understand 'her ideals' as you put it. She was a politician in power but not a 'Leader'.
Funny that you say that. Most working class Brits hate her with a passion.
The lady was a tramp, who trampled on friends and foes alike, a leader of Britain in post war Europe which was embroiled in cold war with Soviet Union and its allies.. She was divisive and had no apathy for consensus She opposed.the unity of two Gemanys and was a reluctant member of the European Economic Union. She was the proponent of free maket economy and alowed a free hand to the Major Banks. In Britain she opposed Labour unions head on, and followed the policy which led to the closing down of mining industry and weakened the manufacturing base in the land. She was not a homo sapien of our tmes.? Rex Minor
Good too see some ppl here understand and appreciate what she really did. Is very annoying hearing her quotes out of context, specifically the one on "there is no such thing as society".
To sum it up, she was a "leader". All the rest since (including in Pakistan) are just "Politicians"..... and there is a big difference.
Well said! We may not like MT but we can definitely respect her dedication to her country. Wish we could say the same of any of our leaders we have today.
@M Baloch: All she did was for the people of of England. Afghans and Argentinians were not her people.
Umm, she was an ice cream seller from interior England, had zero vision and absolute apathy for the poor and needy in her country. Her recipe for success was ultimate submission to Corporate interests to help the rich get richer. So what exactly is there to learn?
Oh Yeah, personal responsibility counts only when it becomes some one else responsibility. Her husband and son were involved in corruption and her son was even involved to overthrow a government in Africa. Her principle just faded away when it came to her son. It is said that Reagan and Thatcher were kind of soul mates, they reflected each others political philosophy, both supported multi-national corporations. When it came to benefit them, they surely received the benefits. I recall Reagan coming to Topeka,Kansas during his primary elections, he spoke to a Small gatherings and I was there with a staunch Republican friend. All he spoke was about responsibility and hand outs, after his speech I asked him if he would receive the matching funds from the government and I pointed out that it was a hand out from the government while his opponent Governor Romney( Mit Romney's father) refused to accept the hand out. He got very upset and for a moment I thought he was going to hit me but he controlled his anger as a good actor would do and said that Romney was richer than him. To me Thatcher was as much of a hypocrite as Reagan was, The conservatives whether in GB or in US, they always were and are for the rich class and big corporations. She did go too far in privatization and who got most of the benefits, it was certainly not the average person in England
There is no doubt that 'Ronny & Maggie' finished USSR for the better of the mankind. Reagan (or his aides/caninet members) made many wrong decisions that affect us till today, they must be lauded for ending the Cold War.
So the lady was the person of the principles, from Afghanistan to Argentina she showed her principles, give us break Dr. sahib..!