N Korea gives evacuation warning to foreign missions

Similar letters have been sent to several European embassies, including Britain and Russia.


Afp April 05, 2013
The North Korean flag. PHOTO: AFP/ FILE

SEOUL: North Korea told Russia and Britain on Friday to consider evacuating its embassy in Pyongyang, as reports suggesting the North was preparing an imminent missile launch prompted a fresh spike in global concern.

An embassy spokesperson told Russian news agencies that the North Korean foreign ministry had suggested they "examine the question of evacuating employees" from the mission.

It told the British mission that it cannot protect foreign embassies after April 10 in the event of a conflict.

The spokesperson said he believed a similar suggestion had been made to other diplomatic missions in the capital.

A spokesperson said Pyongyang had advised London that "from April 10, the North Korean government would be unable to guarantee the safety of embassies and international organisations in the country in the event of conflict".

"The DPRK has responsibilities under the Vienna Convention to protect diplomatic missions and we believe they have taken this step as part of their country's rhetoric that the US poses a threat to them," the Foreign Office spokeswoman said.

North Korea, incensed by UN sanctions and South Korea-US military drills, has issued a series of apocalyptic threats of nuclear war in recent weeks, and international concern that the situation might spiral out of control is clearly growing.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon described the daily threats from Pyongyang as "really alarming and troubling" and Germany summoned the North Korean ambassador to convey Berlin's "serious concern".

Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario said he was flying to Seoul on Saturday and would "fully vet" contingency plans for ensuring the safety of 43,000 Filipino workers in South Korea.

The spike in tensions case as Yonhap news agency, citing a top South Korean government official, said North Korea had loaded two mid-range missiles on mobile launchers and hidden them in underground facilities near its east coast.

"The North is apparently intent on firing the missiles without prior warning," the official said.

The South's Defence Ministry, which on Thursday had confirmed the movement of one missile with "considerable range", declined to comment on the new report.

But a Navy official told Yonhap that two South Korean Aegis destroyers with advance radar systems had been deployed – one off the east coast and one off the west coast – to track any missile launch.

"If the North fires off a missile, we will trace its trajectory," the official said.

The Musudan has never been tested, but is believed to have a range of around 3,000 kilometres (1,860 miles), which could theoretically be pushed to 4,000 with a light payload.

That would cover any target in South Korea and Japan, and possibly even reach US military bases located on the Pacific island of Guam.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Thursday that the barrage of rhetoric flying out of Pyongyang fitted a "regrettable but familiar" pattern of North Korean behaviour.

"We're taking all the necessary precautions," Carney said, citing "prudent measures" to respond to the possible missile threat.

The Pentagon has said it will send missile-interceptor batteries to protect its bases on Guam, a US territory some 3,380 kilometres (2,100 miles) southeast of North Korea and home to 6,000 American military personnel.

Most experts think the North is not yet capable of mounting a nuclear device on a ballistic missile which could strike US bases or territory.

On Thursday the North Korean army said it had received final approval for military action, possibly involving nuclear weapons, against the threat posed by US B-52 and B-2 stealth bombers participating in joint military drills with South Korea.

There has been speculation that Pyongyang might schedule a missile launch to coincide with the birthday of the North's late founder Kim Il-Sung in mid-April.

"A flight test would make sense," Daniel Pinkston, a North Korea expert at the International Crisis Group, told AFP.

"But I'd be surprised if they used an untested missile. At this stage in the game, they don't want to be firing off something that might disintegrate after 30 seconds."

Tensions have soared on the Korean peninsula since December, when the North test-launched a long-range rocket. In February, it conducted its third nuclear test and drew fresh UN sanctions.

The North also warned this week it would reopen its mothballed Yongbyon reactor – its source of weapons-grade plutonium that was closed in 2007 under an aid-for-disarmament accord.

On Thursday, North Korea blocked access to its Kaesong joint industrial zone with South Korea for the second day running, and threatened to pull out its 53,000 workers in a furious reaction to the South's airing of a "military" contingency plan to protect its own workers there.

The Unification Ministry said there were still 608 South Korean citizens in Kaesong, which was shut Friday for a scheduled North Korean holiday.

COMMENTS (5)

Rex Minor | 11 years ago | Reply

The Axis of Evil is live; is it North Korea or North America? The exercises simulating a Nuclear war with Korea by Obam next to North Korea is being answered by Kim, sending mobile missiles capable of carrying the payload of loly pops to USA bases ready to be launched on April 10. It is Obama turn now, who has not prepared Americans fo a wa whereas Kim has been preparing his folks since he took over. .

Rex Minor

Raj - USA | 11 years ago | Reply

@sid: "Fat Kim is useless………….I hope he attacks US that will be the end of his rule………….."

Not just N. Korea is going to be affected. World community has been keeping a careful log of how many times words such as, nuclear power, nuclear armed, nuclear capable missiles, annihilate, major cities within its missile range, etc., have been used by various countries. Generalized behavioral patterns of their armies, political leaders, extremist tendencies prevailing within their societies have also been studied carefully. The constant call by some countries to the West to give them nuclear technology for power generation will also be taken into account, particularly if the sole reason for the demand is that the West has given the technology to some others, as it makes clear that the motives behind this demand is obviously not electric power generation.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ