Many of the new entrants, on the other hand, must have also been intrigued by the two different — nay, opposite responses by the recipients of the offer. I, for one, was not surprised by either of the two responses. The two did exactly what I thought they would do. Najam is perhaps, a couple of years senior to Talat but both entered the profession after about a decade-and-a-half of my entry. So, I followed their careers in the media almost from the very beginning, at times from very close quarters. In fact, at one point in time, Talat and I worked in the same newspaper. I found both to be highly talented, academically sound and professionally exceptional. Both had more than a decade-long print media experience before they entered the electronic version. Talat soon matured into an excellent columnist and then blossomed into a high-grade anchorperson. On occasions, I have also seen him conducting high-quality media workshops for young journalists.
I came to know of the multidimensional qualities of Najam gradually as we developed a fraternal affinity for each other. Being the owner of a highly successful publishing house (Vanguard) and the owner-editor of an English-language weekly, The Friday Times, he was more of an entrepreneur when I first met him. In those days, he was a rarity as until then, perhaps, no foreign-educated person with a degree in economics had entered the media business. In part, he was a converted rebel with a cause as just after completing studies, he had joined the Baloch guerrilla warriors. He was, perhaps, at that impressionable age, a true disciple of Che Guevara. But then, this also reflected his political aspirations.
That he would accept the offer made jointly by the PPP, the PML-N, the PML-Q and the ANP is a matter seemingly inherent in the career goal in-built in the very route that Najam traversed to enter the media world. And his decision to be a caretaker once again, after having admitted that the first time (accountability minister in Mairaj Khalid’s interim cabinet of three months — 1996-97) was a mistake, underscores, like nothing else, his longings. On the other hand, Talat, I believe, knows that his forte is media and media alone, and also perhaps, knows that the level of integrity and credibility he has attained is the result of years of hard work, which, as I understand, he does not want to put on the line for a temporary job of no more than a month. And by the way, the constitution of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists defines a journalist as a person whose main source of income is journalism.
A media person without sources inside the decision-making community or among those who witness the process from very close quarters is like a man on the war front without weapons. It is the demand of the calling that one needs to cultivate people in high and low places in politics and power and also be exposed, knowingly or unknowingly, to manipulation by powers that be. Nevertheless, with sources in such high places, one can even turn into an influence-peddler, promoting his/her own interests. That is the reason why most successful media persons become highly vulnerable to attacks from detractors and are often, rightly or wrongly, accused of being on the take in kind or cash or even in terms of office.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 3rd, 2013.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@asim: Any Pakistani with a sense of integrity and loyalty should be angry with the damage inflicted by few scoundrels on this unfortunate country, unless of course he has been a beneficiary of this corruption. He does not own expensive apartments in Manhattan, pays all taxes and all his assets are accounted for. That Sir is the difference which makes a MAN.
@Ibrahim: So thats why Arif Nizami is your new Information Minister!!!!!!!!!
@Falcon: " @Abid P. Khan: Thanks."
No problem.
I am glad that Sethi Sb accepted it and more than glad that Talat Hussain delined it :)
@Abid P. Khan: Thanks.
Both are good journalists but Najam sethi seems more learned and well read. Talaat Hussein is also a well reputed but sometime he gives the perception of an angry man which is not good for an anchor to conduct as fair and unbiased. Both have their own qualities and weaknesses - Najam sethi's acadamic background gives him significant edge over Talat
@asim: "Yes Talat is great.'
Talat Hussein has always criticized ( rightly) politicians for their mis governance and corruption but when an opportunity came to prove what is governance he opted out. This means he is shaky and not confident to accept the challenge.( It may be said that he does not have the expertise aptitude and capability for such job rather his expertise lies in media) Then where lies his greatness and how can he be termed as great?
Dear Sir, I have great respect for you being Objective and factulal ,have been reading you for long time. In addition to qualities of TH u mentioned here, you should have mentioned that he is rabid Pakistani nationalist, loses objectivity when it come to that. If you get chance to read and listen him during bombay attacks . There was no difference between him and zaid Hussain. Similarly his views about Mulla from Canada suddenly changed from one end to other as key was switched I agree that he is talented. But talent can be used either way. He has treaded path carefully but blaming this government for extremist by him repetitively is intellectuall dishonesty that he commits everyday. As he is knowledgable and he knows well that umbilical cord of killers in Karachi and other parts of country comes from where. It is not acceptable to get your liver lacerated blaming right quarters but blaming wrong people raises many questions.
Zia Saheb thanks for bringing ET and adding spice to English media.
@Falcon: "@Abid P. Khan: Thanks for the primer on the history of leftists in Pakistan. Is there a specific text you would suggest that elaborates on it further? "
The left in Pakistan: a brief history
Farooq Sulehria who is a member of the Executive Committee of the Labour Party Pakistan and on the Editorial Board of Links magazine, has an article, perhaps not the most informative one but still gives you some orientation, about Left's history.
Both are outstanding journalists & we Pakistanis are very proud of them!
Why to bother about who does what? The opportunists grab the opportunity and idealist refuse it.
A Peshawary
I agree with the above two comments: Najam is one of the most objective journalists in Pakistan. Though, Talat is also one of his own kind, but he is highly opinionated.
The names of 2 other distinguished media personalities have been ignored like Kamran Khan ( who declined the offer as per yesterdays programme) and Arif Nizami who has accepted. Probably all except NS were considered for Information slot. Any comments.
You have not mentioned one more pair of Kamran Khan (declined as per y/days programme) and Arif Nizami accepting. Do they deserve a separate column or just discussing in comments would be enough?
@Ibrahim: Notwithstanding your personal comments about Talat, the Ministry of Information is actually very important.
Talat and Najam are polar opposites. Najam is super objective while Talat is extremely judgmental and opinionated. Talat also has the tendency to give cheap below the belt shots at people, most recently he started a show saying "iss mulk main Najam Sethi jaisay log CM bhee ban jatay hain", a direct shot at Sethi. Shows how undignified he can be. Also, his announcement that he got offered this position shows how needy of attention he is. Let's call a spade a spade, this position wasn't a very important one at all. Any journalist would have declined Info minister!
I have seen and heard both of them for a decade, Najam is always interested to reach the high up and need their support of various connections, whereas Talat is capable of discussion and maintain a strong stance on important issues. Najam is more concern to improve opinion in the mind of the viewer on the contrary Talat wanted to bring reality in front of the viewer for the sake of information and improvement. They are the Shahrukh Khan and Aamir Khan of our Media, one likes to be attractive, acceptable and fun loving whereas the other one likes to be remembered, honored and informative. Let them do their best on their own capacities and win our hearts.
@Falcon: "On a side note, I never knew about Najam’s political past, I think if he can make for a great political asset of the nation on the leftist side."
He was imprisoned by Bhutto in 1976 due to involvement in Baloch guerilla movement. In December 1978, Zia disbanded the Hyderabad Tribunal case and released all the Baloch leaders and he was released at that time. In 1999 he was arrested by PML-N for being very critical of Nawaz government, a charge that he was acquitted of. It speaks to his credibility and maturing of the political system that such a person was selected for the caretaker role.
@Abid P. Khan: Thanks for the primer on the history of leftists in Pakistan. Is there a specific text you would suggest that elaborates on it further?
If our nation has half the backbone Talat has, things would have been very different.
Why on the first hand Talat disclosed the offer when nobody knew except he himself? What I know TH, from tv talk shows,is a person constantly bashing politicians and taking side with establishments (see episode of 12 years war on terrorism).He may be a talented person but projecting him as super nationalistic puts his credebility as un-biased journalist in doubts.
@Falcon: "...I think if he can make for a great political asset of the nation on the leftist side. "
There was never a "Left" in Pakistan except Maulana Bhashani from the East, and his followers. A few college boys like Meraj Mohammad Khan and people around him liked their names to be associated with the "Left". There was no substance in the efforts of coffee house pretenders. . Formation of PCP was nipped in the bud already in early 50s. Perhaps Hamza Alavi's analysis is more relevant than Sibte Hassan's who remained a proponent of classic Marxism. . An unshaven face, long hair, Palestinian Shawl and a pair of sandals don't a Leftist make.
Tablat Hussain is following the footsteps of journalists like you Sir, who have over the years earned respect and credibility, while men like Najam may be educated but are susceptible to temptations such as the likes of Naji or maybe even Zia Shahid
I look at the same equation from different perspective at a behavioral level. I feel Najam is talented, tactful and also humble enough to accept criticism that would come out of this exercise. On the contrary, Talat is different, he is very talented but also comes across judgemental at times. I think it is difficult for him to be the very person he is so comfortable critiquing and therefore, he chose to excuse himself from the role.
On a side note, I never knew about Najam's political past, I think if he can make for a great political asset of the nation on the leftist side.
Yes Talat is great.
Najam Sethi of Aapas Ki Baat himself admitted last month that he fails to meet standards if article 62 applied. This is also a challenge for the ECP credibility as they are asking candidates to comply with this article