

The US State Department’s 2010 Country Reports on Terrorism criticises Pakistan as being “plagued by an acquittal rate of approximately 75 per cent” and a legal system “almost incapable of prosecuting suspected terrorists”. Police officers and legal experts note that the threats to witnesses, and also policemen, who may choose to give evidence in a case, was a key ingredient of this problem. Other experts in their presentations and studies have also identified defective investigations and problems in the prosecution process as main reasons why persons accused of terrorist offences manage to get away.
All this is, of course, not entirely new to us. We have heard often of the mediocre police investigation process, the lack of ability to gather solid proof and the reliance on witnesses — who we see, often back away out of fear. A witness protection programme has been talked about, but it is hard to foresee this being especially useful, given our overall situation. Effective witness protection programmes are never easy to run, in any country. However, given the security situation of the country, this is something that is now of utmost necessity and must be devised as soon as possible.
The overall situation needs, however, to be urgently reviewed. Tough laws, such as the Anti-Terrorism Act, become ineffective when they are not backed by the justice system as a whole. It is clear that, for us, terrorism is a major problem. It can be solved only if we look at all the factors in a holistic fashion and find ways to ensure terrorists can be brought to justice and not simply allowed to walk away scot-free.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 3rd, 2013.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ