“Who is Owais Tappi?” This was the question asked by Justice Sarmad Usmani during a hearing of the Karachi law and order case in February this year.
On Monday, that self-same Owais Muzaffar Tappi showed up at a Hyderabad court to face a returning officer (RO) as part of the scrutiny process for aspiring election candidates.
Tappi, who is vying for the PS-88 seat from Thatta and is believed to be the foster brother of President Asif Ali Zardari, never showed up to either receive or submit his nomination papers, but had little choice but to show up for scrutiny. His entry, with an escort of no less than six police mobiles, was a dramatic one and there was a brief furore as some of his guards allegedly misbehaved with assembled lawyers.
Once there, Tappi, who is also said to be the Pakistan Peoples Party’s top choice for Sindh’s next chief minister, swore under oath that he owned no property in Pakistan.
Following this, he was asked by the returning officer how many prayers are offered in a day and the number of Farz rakats in each prayer.
As for why this latter question needed to be asked, former PPP MNA, Justice (Retd) Fakhrunissa, told The Express Tribune that the RO can ask such questions from a Muslim candidate as it was clearly mentioned in article 62 and its clause ‘e’ that a candidate should have adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings and must practice obligatory duties prescribed by Islam as well as abstaining from major sins. Should a candidate fail to satisfy the RO in this regard, he can be disqualified, she said.
An official of the Election Commission of Pakistan also said that the RO has the right to ask any related question if a person claims to be a Muslim on his nomination papers. However a senior lawyer of the Supreme Court, Abid Hassan Minto, pointed to the problems this condition can cause saying that ‘adequate knowledge’ is a subjective term.
Minto said that Gen Ziaul Haq had inserted articles 62 and 63 into the constitution without providing any clarity about their interpretation. He also clarified that, according to constitutional provisions, a candidate cannot be permanently disqualified. Minto also criticised the ECP’s interpretation, saying that if it were strictly adopted then a majority of uneducated villagers would also be declared non Muslims.
Tappi, after answering all the varied questions, left without speaking to the media. The PS-88 constituency he is seeking to contest from is considered a safe seat for him in the wake of the Sherazis and Malkanis joining the PPP. The Ghora Bari taluka, which constitutes the constituency, has traditionally remained a stronghold of the Sherazi and Malkani families.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 2nd, 2013.
COMMENTS (27)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Sherazis and malkanis dont have such as large vote bank in that area, please check the facts. I know it for sure because i belong from that area
Sherazis and malkanis dont have that much vote bank in that area, tappi bhai has our support, please check the area facts
@hasan: Share in a company is not 'property'.
Ridiculous question, has nothing to do with governance.
How come the RO did not ask him about the Police Mobiles and rudeness with the lawyers?
He has no share in Abbas Steel Group in Karachi... REALLY?
Ghorabari Taluka was never been stronghold of Sheerazi nor Malkani families, please refer results of past elections for further verification.
6 police mobiles?? Fire the IG Sind and the area SP.!!
This is outrageous! The Returning officer should be immediately fired from his job. Next thing we know candidates will be disqualified for not having beards and observing purdah!
He should have asked him to recite "Dua-e-Qunoot" and I bet he would have said nothing in reply. 2 weeks ago, my 2 friends went to the hostel mosque for Isha prayer, when they returned they asked me to go to mosque and pray namaz. I asked both of them about Dua-e Qunoot and they replied nothing. They prayed namaz but they didn't know what they said and what they did.
@Mj:
The oath form has a question about adhering to Article 62 C, which asks for these
Mistake of Returning Officer made " Tapi " a hero . Pleas be careful in future .
If Tappi is back and going for elections then what's the point of voting... You know he ain't in it to loose it... And yup rightly said... God save the country now...
i am sure he already knew what questions the RO was going to ask him
Although such questions should not be asked from a candidate but than it is part of the consititution. The PPP leaders shout at the top of thier voices and take credit for the consititutional amandments they made in the last tenure.They ought to have amended these articles, they did not, so its thier fault. They need to go through these embarrassments to remind them of thier folly. These legislators need to do away with laws that are discrimatory, hurt religious sentiments of minorities and that of women. Hope the next parliament has the capacity and heart to make this transition from a pliant and meek to that which is forward looking and intent with doing the best for the downtrotten majority. Let us hope and pray for a future better than the one we have had till now.
So what did Tappi reply? O_o
swore under oath that he owned no property in Pakistan.?????????
His lose tie says it all.. :)
back to the zia era ...
The real question that must be asked by ECP "....Bhai tum ho koun.....?" For the past five years heard the name "tapi" in every case involving illegal allotments of government land in sindh and specialy karachi
After all the scandals and embarrassments we Pakistani citizens have faced every day since independence, it is befitting to know the quality of our future parliamentary hopefuls. Otherwise, we all know the despondency that will turn into desperation. Salams
For an elected representative their are criteria's, the RO is only trying to ascertain if the candidates meets these criteria. If a candidate cannot answer simple question like these how would be able to solve complex and miserable conditions faced by the people. Keeping in view our failed representatives who only came to power to enjoy the perks and increase their wealth, we should have a half yearly review of their perfromances, like we do in schools.
I can bet most people would'nt even know the answer.
How is a potential candidates knowledge of Islam in any way relevant to his potential for being a good lawmaker? What a stupid law! Another thing we can blame Zia for.
Ridiculous
This is totally unnecessary line of questioning. They are running for assemblies, not for the post of local prayer leader.
Tappi the next CM.... Allah save Pakistan.