Najam Sethi will certainly go down in history as the first journalist to get the top slot in Punjab, even if it is for only 40 or 50 days. But would he prefer to be remembered for his journalistic credentials or for his political posts?
Sethi reportedly defended his decision, saying that journalists often criticise wrongdoings in the system but shy away when actually offered the opportunity to run that system. A few years back senior journalist Rahimullah Yusufzai, declined an offer to become a Minister in the NWFP cabinet, saying: “my job is journalism and not politics. I am happy where I am.” Should Sethi have done the same?
There is no doubt that a good journalist should have an intimate understanding of politics, along with good contacts. However, a good journalist should never use his/her contacts or profession as a convenient ladder that can be climbed for political gain.
Having said that, there is no bar on any journalist to quit his profession and join politics. In fact, a good journalist can become a good politician, so long as they quit journalism first.
It is part of our job to keep close contacts with politicians, bureaucrats, military, police, intelligence agencies and a cross section of society, but only for professional reasons. Problems arise when good contacts turn into good friends and we cross the “red line” between professional relations and personal favours. Unfortunately, we often cross that line. In the past, journalists who reached the position of editor often even avoided attending official dinners held by governors or chief ministers and rarely attended functions held by presidents and prime ministers.
A journalist should not accept any positions of political power because to do so is in fact a direct clash of interest. Secondly, a journalist must look for the story but not become part of the story. Thirdly, it is among the basic norms of journalism, that we should not accept any favours, political or otherwise. Fourthly, if we considered the Media as a watchdog or, as is often said, the fourth pillar of the State, then how can we journalists become a part of any other organ of the State?
But Pakistani journalists have been joining politics and serving in government ever since Pakistan emerged on the map of the world. The Ministry of Information played a pivotal role in it, by corrupting the journalists through different kinds of ‘favours’, starting from plots and tours and also by offering money both directly and indirectly.
Over the years, top journalists and columnists have been approached by, and have themselves approached, top politicians in order to get their support and vice versa.
It all started when the late Altaf Hussain quit his post as editor of Dawn and joined Ayub Khan’s cabinet. Since then, many top former editors and journalists have also joined this elite club, such as Mushahid Hussain Syed, Dr Maleeha Lodhi, Sherry Rehman, Hussain Haqqani, and others. There are also a number of columnists who work as “advisers” for different political parties.
The names of some of senior journalists also popped up in the Mehran Bank scam for allegedly accepting money in the 1990 elections. None of them have challenged these allegations.
Sethi is an anchor par excellence and a very powerful writer indeed. He will certainly want to be remembered for his 40 years of journalistic work and not for his 40-odd days as caretaker CM, no matter how good an administrator he turns out to be.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 29th, 2013.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I think good and honest person from any profession can join politics and there is no harm to except a very responsible positon. after all profession people are striving for the good and well being of this poor country and the position of CM/PM offer perfect oppertunity to translets the words into actions!! time for Sathi Sb to translate those beautiful words into action and show the jounerlist community do not deals only with words but can do somthing on ground :)
Wasn't Hanif Ramay the first journalist to head the province? Or is it that the elected people, specially from PPP don't deserve a mention?
Wasn't Hanif Ramay the first journalist to head the province?
Najam sethi himself admitted on TV that he does not meet article 62. This is a complete failure of ECP to select him. SC-CJ will wake up after the interm government will be over as per his tradition
Najam sethi is NOT a politician, he has been just appointed as the CM of Punjab in the care taker government for about 2 months to organise the coming elections. He did not join any political party or contested in elections. Thus he is not a politician, which makes this article baseless and pointless.
To all guys appreciating this article and writer... i say following points: 1. How can a person knows the solution unless he himself wear that shoes. 2. If media is the called the pillar. but it is the relatively new pillar. Judiciary and Army is considered oldest pillars of the state. So why retired guys from there join Government and became part of the story. 3. U just feeling jelous. 4. I think after thats why the other journalist guys have became moderate in criticsm becoz they know in and out of Government and their majboris. 5. Definitely sting will be less after CTCM job against GOVT.
CHill guys and wish him best of luck.
Apart from all above... Mr. Sethi as CTCM can be questioned if other candidates are more qualified then him for the job.
Mr. Hanif Ramay, a journalist, became chief minister of Punjab during the days of ZAB. Najam Sethi is not the first one.
attributes of professionalism have been lost to us. Conflict of Interest, Ethical Integrity are those important words which have been deleted from all dictionaries in Pakistan. Rahimullah Yusuzai is the exception. Najam Sethis form part of the game.
I contradict!.
'A journalist should not accept any positions of political power because to do so is in fact a direct clash of interest."
The question is will he be exercising journalism during his tenure ?obviously Not !. So no clash of interest.
*"Secondly, a journalist must look for the story but not become part of the story".
No reason to believe that, every professional has a right to switch his career even its temporarily .
Thirdly, it is among the basic norms of journalism, that we should not accept any favours, political or otherwise
Did he choose this post to boost his career in jounalism ?I dont think so, he is already at the peak of his career.
*Fourthly, if we considered the Media as a watchdog or, as is often said, the fourth pillar of the State, then how can we journalists become a part of any other organ of the State?*
Again no reason to believe that ,every professional has a right to switch his career even its temporarily .
@gp65: Fully agree with your comments. In fact more journalists who are critical of political system in Pakistan should join politics to bring changes for its betterment.
I am a fan of Sethi saab from across the border.I do not see a conflict of interest as long as he is not pursuing journalism during the time that he is in his current post AND as long as he has signed a non-disclosure agreement to ensure any confidential information that he comes across at this time remains confidential, he should be fine.
His role is restricted to providing necessary executive support to the EC to ensure free and fair elections.
Calm your horses. He's just a caretaker PM, it's not a political post. He's not running for anything.
So what if he's a journalist? He didn't ask for any favours. He himself was approached. In fact, it can also be argued that it would be hypocritical of him to decline since he spends so much time criticising (correctly) the performance of the government. If he shows the way, and does his job to the best of his ability, it will be an invaluable service he is providing.
I am a fan of Mr Sethi from across the border, but I feel he could have served Pakistan better by continuing with what he does best and educated people about the importance of their votes so that his country could redeem itself. With the respect he commands, he could have invited party leaders to his TV show and made them debate on important issues. Anyways, it is his decision and I wish him all the luck.
Very good analysis BUT the question arises, What would have the writer done if he was provided the same oppurtunity like Najam Sethi
Good article! Relevant issues raised but my question is slightly on the ethical and personal plane. Given Mr. Sethi's views on Pakistan and Pakistan ideology (of which we only have a glimpse through the media) should he have accepted the postion? Or is it just a case of 'having the cake and eating it as well'.
He is not being appointed in a political government, so most of your concerns should be allayed.On the other hand, if he sticks to what he has been assigned to, it will further his reputation of a man of integrity.
cannot agree more..spot on