Officials have revealed that Islamabad has insisted that increased reliance on drone strikes for combat operations may cause serious harm to global peace and stability.
When the head of the United Nations team investigating civilian impact of drone use travelled to Pakistan last week, Ben Emmerson was not only conveyed Islamabad’s strong opposition but was also told that the use of pilotless aircraft must be discouraged.
A senior foreign ministry official told The Express Tribune that Islamabad was making all efforts to develop consensus at the UN against the unilateral drone use for counter-terrorism operations in any country.
“The drone technology is now very common and if its unilateral use is not discouraged, it will set a dangerous precedent,” said the official requesting anonymity. The official was part of Pakistan’s team which had briefed Emmerson on the implications of the continued US drone attacks in the tribal areas of the country.
Islamabad’s opposition to the use of combat drones stems from its fears that other countries may emulate this policy particularly in South Asia where certain states have festering political disputes.
“Therefore, we don’t want this technology to be used for combat operations,” the official explained.
Even within the United States, which was the first country to use drones for counter-terrorism operations, there has been continuous debate on the legal implications of the controversial CIA programme.
“People say what is going to happen when the Chinese and the Russians get this technology? The [US] president is well aware of those concerns and wants to set a standard for the international community on these tools,” said a White House spokesperson recently.
But Pakistan expects that the final UN report to be tabled before the General Assembly later this year will help develop consensus against the use of drones as weapons.
The UN launched investigations into the impact of counter-terrorism efforts, including the use of drones on civilians at the request of several countries, including Pakistan, in January this year.
In a statement issued after his previously unannounced trip, the head of the UN panel concluded that US drone strikes did in fact violate Pakistan’s sovereignty.
He made this observation after reported being convinced by Pakistani authorities that there was no secret understanding with the US on drone attacks.
It was also for the first time Pakistan revealed that at least 400 civilians have died in drone attacks since the campaign was launched in the country’s tribal regions in 2004 by the Bush administration.
But his successor, President Barrack Obama stepped up these attacks causing widespread anti-American sentiment across the country.
Despite Pakistan’s repeated opposition, the US has thus far refused to halt these attacks as it considers the programme crucial to eliminate ‘high value’ targets associated with al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 18th, 2013.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Pakistan should be happy and thankfull to US for making Pakistan Safe as drones only kill Terrorist not civilians as it had been prove
UNO could never coerced and convinced India to resolve Kashmir issue in the light of the UNO's resolutions and discharged Kashmir issue from UNO's agenda then how can running under USA's umbrella UNO can refrain USA from conducting drones' strikes on Pakistani tribal areas?????? Pakistan even should never like to cerebrate about it that UNO shall coerce and convince USA to stop drones' strikes on Pakistani tribal areas.....
Sovereignty is not just a right but also a responsibility, A sovereign state is not suppose to harbor "strategic assets" for proxy wars either.
I am perplexed as to why Pakistan is insisting on fresh international law when existing international law is already in place. Existing international law is clear that Pakistan is well within its right to shoot down any drone violating its airspace.
If I were a citizen of Pakistan I would be insisting that the Government first take action by shooting down drones violating Pakistani airspace and quit wasting time and resources to obtain an international law in order to stop drones violating airspace when there already is an international in place to shoot down such intruding drones.
Get over it. Obviously Pakistan can't be trusted to keep its own house in order.