Containing North Korea

The problem with sanctions is they end up hurting the people while doing little to dislodge a dictatorial government.


Editorial March 12, 2013
The North Korean flag. PHOTO: AFP/ FILE

Former basketball star Dennis Rodman’s recent foray into freelance international negotiation would have been amusing were it not undertaken in a country where the situation is so fraught with deadly possibility. The Chicago Bulls player met with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un and declared him a friend who is popular with his own people. Rodman was either too ignorant to know or simply did not care that the leader of this totalitarian state is one of the biggest threats to the world who has little concern for his impoverished people. And as bad as the situation has been ever since the Korean War of the 1950s, Kim Jong Un has taken the sabre-rattling to new extremes over the last year.

The North Korean leader’s latest provocation was to unilaterally scrap the armistice which had been in effect since the end of the Korean War. Last year, he had moved a long-range rocket to a launching pad to coincide with a nuclear security summit in South Korea, although the rocket tamely fell to pieces and landed in the sea when it was tested. He has also threatened pre-emptive nuclear strikes against South Korea, boasted that his country’s missiles can reach the US and also refused to answer South Korean calls on a hotline phone. North Korea is obviously an enormous headache for its neighbour and the US but its nuclear capability essentially shields it from military attack and so, sanctions are the only weapon that can be used against it.

The problem, as always, with sanctions is that they end up hurting the people while doing very little to dislodge the dictatorial government from power. Negotiations have been tried countless times and any agreement has always been short-lived. Kim Jong Un is even more bellicose than his father and has shown no interest in giving up his nuclear capability in return for better relations and the possibility of aid from the US. The only way a dictator can feel safe is if he has the nuclear capability to deter an attack. This is a lesson North Korea seems to have taken to heart.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 13th, 2013.

COMMENTS (3)

Something Clever | 11 years ago | Reply

"but its nuclear capability essentially shields it from military attack" Incorrect. The actual opinion is that their nuclear capabilities aren't presently a threat. The sanctions are in place with the intent to keep it that way. Not to harm them because they can't do it any other way. Regardless of what the pudgy little monster may want people to think, the US is entirely out of reach of their weaponry at present time. They're still equipped like a military in the 1950s. He is currently making threats he has no way of backing up.

cautious | 11 years ago | Reply

The only way a dictator can feel safe is if he has the nuclear capability to deter an attack. This is a lesson North Korea seems to have taken to heart. . Rubbish - N Korea was belligerence long before it had nukes and anyone who thinks nukes is a guarantee against attack ignores the battles that the USA, Russia, China, UK, France etc have all endured after they have developed nukes.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ