FIFA approve fourth goal-line technology

New system uses 14 high-speed cameras around the pitch.


Reuters March 01, 2013
England defender John Terry clears a ball which the referee adjudged to have not crossed the line, sparking a debate on goal-line technology. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

ZURICH: A fourth system of goal-line technology has been approved and granted a licence, confirmed football’s governing body Fifa yesterday.

Fifa said that the German-produced GoalControl 4D used 14 high-speed cameras placed around the pitch and directed at both goals to determine whether the ball had entered the goal.

“The position of the ball is continually and automatically captured in three dimensions as soon as it approaches the goal-line,” said Fifa. “When the ball has completely crossed the line, the central analysis unit sends an encrypted signal to the referee’s watch in less than a second. GoalControl 4D can be used with both standard goalposts and balls.”

The systems previously approved are Hawk-Eye, which is used in tennis and cricket and like GoalControl is optical-based, and GoalRef, which uses magnetic fields.

Fifa approved the use of goal-line technology last year following a number of controversial incidents where teams had legitimate goals disallowed because officials wrongly judged that the ball had not crossed the line.

European football’s governing body Uefa has yet to adopt goal-line technology, preferring to employ an extra linesman behind each goal.

The four systems will all participate in a tender to provide goal-line technology at this year’s Confederations Cup and the 2014 World Cup in Brazil.

Fifa used both GoalRef and Hawkeye at last year’s World Club Cup in Japan, when goal-line technology was used for the first time in professional matches. However, only one system is likely to be chosen for the World Cup.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 2nd, 2013.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ