Lal Masjid commission: ‘Musharraf was determined to use force’

Witness says force was used and negotiations with the government were a farce.


Umer Nangiana February 20, 2013
According to Khalil, former president Pervez Musharraf had decided to use force against the inmates of the Lal Masjid, talks were merely a cosmetic measure. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

ISLAMABAD:


Ansarul Ummah (AU) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman Khalil on Tuesday told a one-man judicial commission on the Lal Masjid incident that the operation had been pre-planned.


According to Khalil, former president Pervez Musharraf had decided to use force against the inmates of the Lal Masjid, and sending a team for talks with mosque clerics was merely a cosmetic measure.

During the operation, it was Khalil who was delegated authority to hold talks with the government on behalf of deputy cleric Abdur Rashid Ghazi during the operation.

“Ghazi wanted to settle the issue peacefully through talks. I had managed to bring him around and agree on the government’s demands but Musharraf had already planned the operation,” Khalil told the commission headed by Justice Shehzad Sheikh of Federal Shariat Court in his written and verbal statement.

Ghazi died inside the mosque’s compound, along with dozens of others, on July 10, 2007. The government’s negotiation team, headed by Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain of Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid, and the mosque’s delegation had met and agreed upon a five-point agenda for ending the conflict. However, the official delegation left at the last minute to get the agreement approved by Musharraf.

“Musharraf rejected the agreement altogether and imposed new conditions that included the surrender of 30, not five, Lal Masjid men. I managed to convince Maulana Ghazi on that, too,” Khalil said. “But just when we were holding talks, the security forces stormed the mosque.” He said it was Musharraf’s ‘hard-headedness’ that caused the catastrophe.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 20th, 2013.

COMMENTS (6)

Peace Lover | 8 years ago | Reply

The Commission should also investigate as to whether napalm bombs or other chemical weapons were used in the Lal Masjid operation. At the time, sections of the press alleged that many inmates, according to some estimates, more than a hundred, including women, were killed but all remains could not be recovered as many were burnt to ashes and even the debris was cleared before the press was let in to investigate.

Aahjiz BayNawa | 8 years ago | Reply

Taking law into one's own hand cannot be condoned. What was common between the Lal Majid leaders and students and Musharraf was that both were guilty of taking law into their hands and confronting the state, defying its writ. But Musharraf came to power by not only taking law into his own hands, not only challenging the writ of the Government but by also violating and subverting the Constitution, thereby committing acts of high treason. The Supreme Court has a responsibility to bring Musharraf to justice.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read