The victory, with a day to spare, gave South Africa a winning 2-0 lead in the three-match series. It came after a dramatic Pakistan collapse in their second innings.
Pakistan were bowled out for 169 after starting the day on a relatively comfortable 100 for three. They lost their last six wickets for 22 runs on either side of lunch. At one stage four wickets fell in 13 balls, including three off successive deliveries.
The collapse was engineered by left-arm spinner Robin Peterson and opening bowler Vernon Philander, who took three wickets each before Dale Steyn finished off the Pakistan innings.
Peterson finished with three for 73 and Philander took four for 40.
The result was a disappointment for Pakistan, who had seemed on top after two days before a strong fightback by South Africa's lower order batsmen on Saturday.
Pakistan off-spinner Saeed Ajmal took four for 51 in South Africa's run chase to finish with match figures of ten for 147.
Set to make 182 to win, South Africa lost Alviro Petersen ten runs into their chase, when he was leg before wicket to Umar Gul for one.
Captain Graeme Smith and Hashim Amla put on 53 for the second wicket before Smith was leg before to Saeed Ajmal for 29 shortly before tea.
Ajmal gained a second leg before decision when he dismissed Jacques Kallis for 21.
Amla and De Villiers shared a rapid 62-run partnership for the fourth wicket before both batsmen perished playing attacking shots. Faf du Plessis became Ajmal's tenth victim of the match before Dean Elgar hit the winning run.
Pakistan made slow but solid progress at the start of the day, seeing off the threat of fast bowlers Philander and Dale Steyn.
But they had only added 14 runs in 8.2 overs to their overnight total of 100 for three when captain Misbah-ul-Haq top-edged a sweep against Peterson and was caught by Smith at short fine leg for 44.
Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq added 33 for the fifth wicket before Shafiq was unlucky to see a defensive stroke against Philander bounce up and then back on to his stumps. The wicket fell five overs after the umpires called for a replacement ball after the original ball went out of shape.
Peterson bowled Sarfraz Ahmed, who padded up to a ball pitched outside leg stump, with the last ball of the next over. Philander then took wickets with the first two balls of the following over.
A long vigil by Azhar Ali ended when he edged an outswinger to wicketkeeper AB de Villiers. Ali made 65 off 193 balls with seven fours. Umar Gul edged the next ball and Alviro Petersen flung himself to his left at third slip to take a spectacular catch.
South Africa were without fast bowler Morne Morkel, who left the field with a hamstring injury on Saturday, but Peterson bowled accurately for all but two overs from the Kelvin Grove end, enabling Smith to use Philander and Steyn in short bursts.
Philander, who took five for 59 in the first innings, had match figures of nine for 99.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Pakistan's openers have proven to be extremely reliable, they fail to score 9 times out of 10. What they need to do is send their bowlers to open the batting; since it is patently impossible to score less than zero, the bowlers cannot do any worse and the inevitable loss of a few wickets early on may not be so bad then.
Well I agree with most of you on below par performance from our openers, fast bowlers (only in this test) and from Wicket keeper. But there are other points which I would all the readers to think about:
Taking of the new ball by Misbah, when we were about the wrap up the SA innings and Ajmal was bowling really well, why do you take the new ball? We all know that new ball brings runs on the board and our fast bowlers were not bowling well at that time. Decision of Umpires to take the new ball, when Pak were batting, well before the 20 over quota? They could have take a semi - old ball and then taken the new ball when it was due? Decision to play Tanwir instead of Abdul Rahman... I really think that we should have played to our strenght i.e. spinners in the absence of Junaid. Lastly, our prepratoins for the TESTs, why our openers did not batted against Fast bowlers on a bouncy wicket?We need to take a lot of learning from this episode... some positives though.. our middle order is coming back and need support from all of us.
Match was lost when Misbah and Azhar Batted defensively for whole day@ . They should know how to play attacking cricket , But i dont think that they are able to play any sort of cricket.
Where are those who were all praise for Hafeez and wanted to drop Misbah and make him the captain? Like Afridi, Hafiz is a great all rounder against mediocre oppositions and on docile wickets. If somebody needs to be dropped it should be the two openers who have been the weakest link in our weak batting line.
Now PCB will boast that our team's performance is ever improving in South Africa. In the first Test they lost in three days and in the second Test our team lost in four days. This reminds me of an old joke wherein, a school inspector asked a student answer for 3+3 and the reply was 5, upon which the headmaster (read here the chairman PCB) intervened and said Sir, this student has improved since last year, when he answered your same question and replied 3+3 was = 4.
South Africa is the world's best Test team. Pakistan was playing them in their backyard. Having lost the first match they competed throughout the game and won quite a few sessions this time. Pakistan team should be realistic and take the positives out of this match. Ajmal's performance was superb.
Tanvir and Sarfraz were playing just to fill Karachi quota. Otherwise both should be playing some club cricket and not the international .
This should mark the end of below average cricketers like sarfraz and tanvir.
hopeless openers.did nothing so far.
SA - 2nd Ini - 100 all out.
The difference is SA's wicket keeper and ours.
SA will win.