The debt trap

The real answer lies in austerity, in cost-cutting. Not by the average Pakistani but by the government.


Editorial February 02, 2013
The real answer lies in austerity, in cost-cutting. Not by the average Pakistani but by the government.

Debt is not really a bad thing. Pakistan has always had a budget deficit since its inception and loans were taken as early as the 1950s and 1960s. Loans taken for the right purpose, used properly, and then paid back on time are always critical to the development of an economy.

But a loan acquired to pay off another loan makes much less financial sense and is also very risky. It is also important to gauge an economy’s ability to pay back debt. The risk increases if the ability of the economy in question to pay back the loan is also in doubt. If that is the case, then the economy is at risk of slipping into a debt trap.

In its annual report released on January 30, the State Bank of Pakistan has warned that the fiscal deficit of 8.5 per cent last year (FY-12) is not sustainable and could push the country towards a debt trap as the public debt-to-GDP ratio has reached 62.6 per cent.

The report rejected the government’s expectations for higher economic growth and low fiscal deficit for the current fiscal year. Indeed, urgent measures are needed to arrest this trend and stop a further slide into the debt trap.

There is an urgent need to increase the tax base, to stop giving tax waivers and to limit non-development expenditure. This sounds like a broken record, but it is the only way.

We need to stimulate real growth in the economy while ensuring stability, security and investor-friendly policies. There should be strict checks and balances in place before approval of any further debts. In fact, while it may seem like a financial impossibility, Pakistan is courting disaster unless it plans a strategy based on acquiring no more debt from this point on.

The real answer lies in austerity, in cost-cutting. Not by the average Pakistani but by the government. The size of the government and the bureaucracy has to be reduced, the cost of that manpower has to be reduced.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 2nd, 2013.

COMMENTS (4)

Mika | 11 years ago | Reply

Firstly we are not from Rothschild Plantation of India so things works slightly differently in rest of the world.

Default? Banksters fear customer default more than they fear debt moratorium, so it will work out nicely for both sides.

Pakistan can repatriate the looted wealth from Swiss and offshore accounts at first. If they don't want haircut, there is always default which will be messy for banksters.

If one can believe they can beat bankster's arithmetic, they can look back at 65 years of Pakistan, imported finance ministers and their love for IMFs and World Banks.

Pakistan should get debt moratorium. I hope PTI does that.

p r sharma | 11 years ago | Reply

@Mika: " Why not get a debt moratorium instead of killing whatever social welfare is left."

Seeking a debt moratorium at this stage will tantmount to debt structuring meaning / signalling thereby country's inability to service the debt on time( a position of default0. This will be a alarming situation and it will drastically curtail the capacity to raise loan in the international market and even if loan is raised the pricing will be quite higher which no country would like to encounter.

"Foreign banksters are responsible for handing money to corrupt rulers, so they should take the hair cut." hair cut is a situation where the lender sees that the debtor's ( Pakistan) debt instrument has lost credibility/ capacity to repay in farseeing period and it is better to forego some amount of the debt amount and sell the instrument at a discount. -- This situation is worse than the first one of allowing moratorium ( some more time ) to repay. in the light of above will you like to amend your original comment?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ