What kind of heroine would Pakistani audiences rather see on TV?
For the past three months, my mother was vigorously rooting for Team Behlul-Bihter, the adulterous couple that graced our television screens in the 9-10 pm slot, along with images of the scenic Bosporus, pixellated cleavage shots, and lots and lots of orange juice for breakfast. A regular homemaker, my mother has the typical middle-aged Pakistani woman’s outlook towards television soaps: she sympathises with the doormat underdog heroine of local television dramas, and heaps copious anathema upon the western-styled English-spouting husband-stealing vamp who stalks ingenuous men.
And yet, when it comes to these Turkish dramas, her stance takes a 180 degree turn.
Things are no different in living rooms across the country. Such is the power of the tidal wave of Turkish dramas sweeping across our TV channels that aunties, grannies and spinsters have swooned over the charms of Behlul and wept bucket-loads when Bihter finally commits suicide when her cowardly lover refuses to elope with her.
What explains the popularity of these poorly-dubbed shows among our audiences? Of course, the new faces, the European lifestyle and exotic locations in a sleekly produced package are a big draw. But beneath the glamorous surface, don’t these soaps follow nearly the same plots as local shows, with the same family politics, the same rivalries, and the same penchant for eavesdropping to move the story forward? Aren’t the women still pining away after men they love, while domestic violence is still at hand, if somewhat rarer?
But look closer, and you’ll spot a crucial difference. Whereas Pakistani drama ratings are famously proportional to how much the heroine cries, the strong, liberated woman of the Turkish soaps who sets out to get what she wants topples all notions of what a heroine beloved of the Pakistani audiences must behave like. The Turkish heroine is not the ideal woman, but she certainly has a spine and is a far cry from her Pakistani counterpart whose weapon of choice is tears and who cries harder and harder in each subsequent episode to win the audience over.
On the other hand, the heroines in the Turkish dramas aired so far in Pakistan pretty much tend to make their own decisions. They don’t need men, parents, society or their own children to affirm what they do with their lives. There are no status quo-reinforcing characters telling women what kind of behaviour is expected from them “for their own good”.
Another difference is that in these shows, there is no idolisation of men as some kind of unerring, out-worldly deities who are above sin and transgression. No man will parrot the “I am male and therefore I will womanise incessantly” line with bravado. There are thankfully fewer images of the crying woman left at home, while the man philanders around. If anything, women are as actively involved in extramarital affairs as the men. While this is not necessarily an indicator of women’s emancipation, it does break the stereotype that fidelity is a given when it comes to women, while men have a wildcard to be ‘men’ and get away with it, like they do in local soaps.
Most refreshingly, there is no internalisation by the female characters of men as some kind of demigods who must be pleased, whose favour must be won, and whose word is the Final Word. There is no wronged woman, who must suffer in silence, and can only redeem herself by winning the favour of some central male figure. Thankfully, Turkish dramas, by and large, bin the concept that whoever has the ‘man’ on her side is the queen of the world. This is how they do away with the doormat heroine who is used, abused and rises above all by finally winning her husband’s heart.
While Turkish soaps do often feature violence, in all the Turkish soaps that have been aired in Pakistan so far, I have yet to see a woman hit by a ‘nice’ guy. On the other hand, it is quite common to see even the upright hero in Pakistani soaps strike the doormat heroine if she is suspected of infidelity (or, worse still, if she errs in performing her housework ... intolerable!). There is no bashing of women without consequence, and in contrast to what happens in local soaps, men do not just slap and shove women, and get away with it by mouthing a measly apology.
Then, there are no women being nasty witches just for the heck of it, simply to make the lives of other women in the household miserable. Rather they have real, tangible motives which makes the plot more credible. If a woman is being evil, it is safe to assume that it is to a purpose (like greed for money) than just winning a man’s affections; or worse, some kind of botched reverse Oedipus complex, a la Humsafar.
Very crucially, there is no depiction of polygamy as a perfectly acceptable, religiously-sanctioned arrangement in Turkish dramas. Rather, Turkish soaps show love triangles involving one man and two women to be serious, irreconcilable problems. In our drama serials, the ‘one man-two wives’ scenario is treated as something almost normal and quite common, which is resolved by the old wife coming around to the new wife; the debate is usually about how well the women come to terms with the arrangement. Also, in Pakistani dramas, polygamy happens when the ‘good’ boy is lured by the ‘bad, western’ girl. If, on the other hand, a married woman has feelings for someone else, then she has to be a ‘bad’ girl to begin with. The same is not true for men: married men may initiate affairs without being ‘bad’ by default.
While debate on the Turkish dramas currently raging across Pakistan focuses on the skin show and alcohol consumption, I think it is actually the empowered woman of Turkish serials that secretly scares our men. I say this because most of them seem to be okay with bare midriffs and more in Indian soaps and films that promote the retrogressive mindset where the good girl/bad girl demarcation is very black-and-white. On the other hand, Turkish soaps with their liberated (yet Muslim) women challenge our social insecurities and push the boundaries. They might be a fad, evaporating by the next season, but they will hopefully raise the bar for the portrayal of the ‘ideal’ woman from homely doormat to a more emancipated individual. Maybe the sequel of Humsafar will feature a Khirad who takes a few notes from Bihter, and walks out on her husband next time he shoves her to the floor in a fit of rage.
Published in The Express Tribune, Ms T, January 27th, 2013.
Like MsT on Facebook for your dose of girl talk.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Saif Ali khan Nice article, very well written. Agree with most of your points. Enjoy Fatima GUL on Urdu 1. Cheers.
@pakistanigirl: "RUBBISH" isn't the best word to start a mature cicilized debate.
@oooh: Tunnel vision is the word that comes to mind.
@pakistanigirl: Khirad from Shehr e zaat was annoying, depressive character. It portrayed misguided spirituality. If your husband dumps u for ugly vile women, weep and cry for six months and go back to him. That's the idiotic message it teaches us. Sorry I can't relate to this retrogressive approach. Turkish dramas have high production value, good acting and nice way of good story telling. They show fresh new faces and our drama industry can learn o lot from them.
I am amazed at the rubbish the writer is propagating in the name of "women empowerment". i am a married woman in my early thirties, with two beautiful kids and 8 years of marriage behind me. i chose to be a home maker despite having a graduate degree from an Ivy league university. i adore my kids and husband but we do have the casual tantrums and fights but that does not make me a slave. the idea that a woman who gives time and attention to her family is a slave too her culture or wishes of her husband is barbaric to say the least. Moreover comparison of pakistani dramas to turkish is like deciding what to feed your family, guns or butter? lately pakistani dramas have come up with intelligent story writing, exceptional acting and outstanding directorial work without which both the acting and writing lay flat. More over the underlying spiritual lesson or story in some of the dramas leaves anyone with a little senstivity for things of higher vale spellbound. A crying heroine, or one who remains quiet over her circumstances is not a woman who is defeated and enslaved but is a symbol of the foundations of spirituality, and its called sabr meaning patience. Sabr has mentioned more in Quran than Salaat. Sabr is something our religion preaches again and again for it takes us to the path of the sufis and the mystics, people who get the treasures of the world beyond human comprehension and respect from this worldy populace. on the other hand the turkish woman you are so ardently passionate about is a symbol of everything this worldy alone. "My myself and I" for this woman her desires are the only thing important. she can do anything and everything to fulfill them. Rumi calls such people running after their carnal desires no better than animals. To be a human demands of us that we subvert our carnal desires and prove ourselves better than God's other creations. What moral is Bihter teaching to our viewers? and to what level of spirituality is Khirad inspiring our women? To me the answer is obvious. To you, its the dilemma of this world, its treasures and temporary satisfaction more important.
Ishq-i-Memnu may have been called a hit because it had a scandalous story with good-looking people, but many people watched it simply for superb subtle acting and good story telling. It was a glamorous production. Asi, on the other hand, is a farming community's story and didn't become a hit the 1st time it was shown on TV - because it didn't have a 'salacious hook' and had slow-paced romance. Freshness will always sell big for a while and that's why Turkish is badly needed right now on Pak TV. As for everyone commenting about the 'bad dubbing', I don't know why everyone keeps harping about it - all the faces match the voices, in age and in emotion - what more does one want???
I don't agree with this: completely different drams coming from completely different cultures. However, I love and respect Turkish culture. That does not mean we forget ours. That is a question of identity. If it is not Turkish, is it is Indian, if not that, then- American. Pakistan needs to embrace its unique identity and grow up. Pakistan is beyond its adolescent years and it is time that it embraces its adulthood and stop aping different cultures and identities like a confused teen.
ok...after reading the article and comments i have one thing to say...
go to turkey ...because u like their imported culture....simple... turkey has taken up western culture because they have no choice.....EU membership demands it.....
In my last post, i should ve mentioned that the lead role played by Ashir Azeem himself is in every way desirable for a strong pakistani woman of these times still. I bet a huge number of gilrs like Ashir Azeem's heroine would not take a second look on men like Ashar (Humsafar) though. And fir all the right reasons too. Lol
Good article! And i say that we really need to focus on the characters present in our dramas, there are some stereotypes that we really need to break and make out some decent and genuine portrays of the society.
I agree with so many points in this blog. Does someone remember the two female lead roles of Ashir Azeem's Dhwan around 20 yrs ago? The character played by Nazli Nasar was in every way presentable to any body from all over the world proudly showing how a strong young pakistani lady like her was defending her country actively by putting her life at risk and how she rounded up all the bad guys even after loosing the love of her life. She had both brain and beauty, not to mention highly sophusticated training for the kind of anti narcotics and anti terrorist work that she was doing. 20 yrs down the line, we end up with Khirad. But khirad's aim in life was just to make sure she had Ashar while the character played by by Nazli wanted to make sure so many khirads kept their husbands by making this society safer. Both dramas were huge usccess so i guess the audience did nt fail. Its the drama industry that has failed us. Every other lady writing in a women digest (sorry but they are not best of literature really), has picked up pen and writing serials for the ratings. And fir the money too. No wonder we have nt got Fatima S. Bajya and Ashir Azim anymore.
Loved the article. Our dramas could use more independent women who are not just looking for validation from their husbands or the society and these women are individuals who can not simply be classified as a whimpering wives or a husband-stealing vamps.
Maybe we did not have characters like Bihter but we did have some emancipated women on TV in PTV classics. E.g. Mehnaz in Alpha Bravo Charlie marries the guy she wants not her cousin, Another very good drama was "Bezaban" I think which was all about people mistreating women and being extremely strict with them whereas their boys are allowed a much freedom as possible and all the negative consequences this brings. Also most Maria wasti dramas etc. Infact when you watch some re-runs on PTV you will be actually surprised because Dramas back then were actually a lot more open minded and better than today. Maybe we really have moved backwards??
Good article!! TBH I never got around Humsafar's story at all. I think the acting was superb, locations great and script amazing but the whole story was very hard to digest. It seemed that the sole focus of every single person in the show was one man "Ashar". If he didn't exist maybe the women would be better off or maybe live in a pointless existence? Even the men were obsessed with Ashar in a way with one of the boys trying to emulate him so he can marry his cousin. And thus Ashar's status really was raised to that of a demigod with everybody fighting to be HIS humsafar. Is that really how it works in the real world though?? Does the life of so many people revolve around one guy who lets be honest is not that amazing.
I think Pakistani dramas are great but I want more complex and layered characters like Bihter was. Pakistani dramas are black or white. Infact in my opinion the golden days of Paki drama were the good old PTV days. Now those really were classic dramas.
I think you should need to watch Turkish dramas first then write something about it.
Owesum! i believe a woman is the strongest creature on this earth, she concieves and carries a life, which no man can do. What our society needs to learn is the stronger the women the stronger the home. A woman should have her strong ideology, a clear set of mind, a vision above the aura of style and makeup, intelligence and practicality as weapons instead of tears. Woman is not as fragile as she is portrayed and she shouldn't be either!
@Sadia Majeed: You an another extreme of our society. There is nothing wrong if some woman choose to become a housewife and her man have to take care of her. For example I love my wife and i always treat her with love and she chooses to become a housewife but i never looked down upon her rather she is the one who manage most of the finances of the house. The role of the mother could not be replaced with some man and i dont think women are considered slaves in this manner. It is a rule of the nature that a feminine character is always physically weak but mentally they are stronger at times and at the same time they are being pampered in nature as well. Just study nature and from Queen bees in hives to female sparrows in a nest they are taken care of. Women cannot replace the character of Maula Jatt and men cannot replace the character of Mother Teressa.
Pakistanis are as Racist as Arabs. So the answer is simple. The whiter the Skin the better. If worshiping of the white skin would be allowed in Islam then we will be the first to do that. Turkish are white people so obviously they would have more preference in a racist society like Pakistan.