Pakistan-India relations

Better relations would force a cut in military budgets on both sides. New Delhi should take the initiative.


Kuldip Nayar January 18, 2013
The writer is a syndicated columnist and a former member of India’s Rajya Sabha

When I received the Mother Teresa award, this year, for working towards improvement of relations between India and Pakistan, I was happy to believe that there must have been some tangible evidence of it to get me the recognition.

Then comes one Rehman Malik, interior minister of Pakistan, and nearly severs everything. He did everything possible to spoil relations through his statements and remarks. He stayed in the capital for only three days last month but reignited the fires of suspicion, bias and hatred.

First, he compared the demolition of Babri Masjid with the terrorist attacks on Mumbai to suggest that the demolition was the job of Hindus and the 26/11 attacks of Muslims, thereby renewing the memory of the holocaust during Partition and reiterating the two-nation theory, which even the founder of Pakistan, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, abandoned after independence. Then, Malik brushed aside the agony of Captain Saurabh Kalia’s father, who received his son’s mutilated body 20 days after the Kargil war. The Pakistan Army has denied the inhuman act but it could have at least held an inquiry to allay India’s doubts on Kalia’s case.

Malik, when pressed, said that his ministry would probe but I doubt if he can dare do anything against the army’s wishes. In any case, no one has taken his visit seriously. The anger was so deep that India did not agree to a joint press conference or even a joint statement.

Malik’s disastrous visit eclipsed the welcome gesture that the Supreme Court of India had made. It had freed Dr Khalil Chisti, a Pakistani doctor, who was mistakenly implicated in a murder case when he had travelled to India in 1992 to see his ailing mother, who died while he was there. In contrast, the government, given the facts, was rigid and too legalistic. Some human rights activists put before the government the negligible role, if any, played by Chisti.

Initially, the Rajasthan government saw that Chisti was not to be blamed and recommended Governor Shivraj Patil to pardon him. Patil was adamant and rejected the state’s proposal. Mahesh Bhatt, a famous filmmaker, and I, met Patil at Chandigarh and pleaded Chisti’s case, stating that he was 80 years old and suffering from a heart condition. But this did not appeal to the governor who argued that Chisti had been on bail and must spend some time in jail to serve the purpose of justice.

The Pakistan media does not take up the case of excesses committed against minorities as forcefully as the Indian media does. It was because of the media that the Bharatiya Janata Party leaders could not hide their faces when the Babri Masjid was demolished.

I can see a change in the attitude of Indians and Pakistanis towards each other. They never harboured hostility despite the sterile attitude of the two governments. Now, they make bold comments and feel repentant on the massacre of millions during Partition. The public in both countries must force their governments to cut the military expenditure. Better relations would force a cut in military budgets on both sides. New Delhi should take the initiative.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 19th, 2013.

COMMENTS (20)

Arijit Sharma | 11 years ago | Reply @A reader: "...Let me put this another way – would Pakistan allow Hindus, who are a majority in the Indian subcontinent, have a plebiscite to decide if they want their native lands in Pakistan back?..." If you ask Muslims, they will say Jerusalem belongs to them because they had it, before the Jews begain to control the city. Why not extend the same logic to Kashmir - it was totally Hindu/Buddhist before it became mostly Muslim. Unlike Jerusalem, which was Jewish before it became "Muslim" and then "Jewish" again; Kashmir was ALWAYS Hindu/Buddhist. Go figure.
sanjay | 11 years ago | Reply

With great respect to Mr. Nayyar, I would like to mention here that as a citizen of India he has right to suggest very well to the Govt of his country to cut down the defence budget and increase the budget allocated for education and health. It may be possible that a serious debate can be initiated in budget session of Parliament, and whatever decision may be taken is accepltable by the Indian Defence Ministery as well but I doubt that same thing will happen in Pakistan where supremacy of Parliament is always in question. The truth is no body wants to share the power and prvilage in general.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ