The symbolism of the Hazara protest on Alamdaar Road in Quetta Feisal Naqvi has already penned. He cannot be outperformed so I will stick to the banal and the prescriptive.
The Raisani government has been sacked — finally. The man was not only remarkably incompetent, he was also heartless. His sacking, as did his government’s departure, has come four years too late. But now that he has better reason to live in his G-6/3 house in Islamabad, the question is: what next?
The federal government has put Balochistan under Governor’s Rule, given the Frontier Corps police powers to apprehend and investigate the accused and made the Corps Commander, Southern Command, the head of operations.
Raisani’s sacking is a necessary but not sufficient condition for addressing the problem of sectarian terrorism, as also other problems in the province.
Has the government done the sufficient? No. Neither the FC nor the army is geared to conduct the kind of operations required to deal with the problem. Also, the army cannot be pulled in to do something it is not trained to do at a time when it has other problems on its hands.
I have said this before, repeatedly, and I will say it again. Terrorism requires, for effective CT operations, a very high degree of intelligence expertise and a force, whether part of the police or a separate one, which is equipped and trained exclusively to deal with acts of terrorism. This does not mean that other elements of the security apparatus will remain inert but that they will be supporting elements of this force.
Terrorism has been the single deadliest threat to Pakistan for the past decade. Dealing with it requires a national, proactive strategy that must be overseen and implemented by an umbrella organisation. There’s no strategy that I know of — unless it’s the best-kept secret — and the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (NACTA) remains stillborn. The government’s interest in this matter is, of course, evident from the time it took Islamabad to acknowledge the Hazara killings and do the necessary. As for the sufficient, I am unhappy to report that neither the government nor the security apparatus is prepared to counter the terrorism threat.
Who does the government call upon to train the police; who does it call upon to run day to day administrative affairs in a conflict zone? The army. Problem: the army doesn’t know anything about eithertraining a modern, effective police force or running the administration beyond exhibiting better managerial skills.
Counterterrorism is not just about getting the police to practice shooting weapons, conducting raids and mounting snap operations. That’s just one part of the game. This is what the army trains the policemen in. More important is gathering intelligence, collating and analysing that data and then creating a picture. This part of the game requires a very high-level of investigative and analytical skills that the army doesn’t possess. It also requires equipment that, for the most part, we don’t have. There is a very small cadre of police officers who have learnt on the job. But our capacity, currently, is woefully inadequate on all counts. I know of no effort to address this dismal situation.
Corollary: do not be surprised if the necessary doesn’t translate into the sufficient.
Now, to the situation at the Line of Control. Pakistan and India are at war — on Indian television screens. In fact, one important CBM between Pakistan and India would be to send a major part of the Indian electronic media — honourable exceptions aside — on long, paid leave. The problem with these jumping-jack warmongers is that I suspect not many have ever fired a bullet in anger or held a weapon, unless for an awkward pose before the cameras.
Put things in a perspective, fellas. Remember the facts that have come out in your own press by those who are discerning. India provoked. Pakistan retaliated. India, through its construction of bunkers and observation posts, is in violation of the LoC agreement. As for beheading and slitting throats and the moral outrage, who are you kidding? Ask your special forces about the best way of silently disposing of a sentry or a patrolman. You will find the answer to be throat-slitting. As for beheading, I personally find the practice unacceptable but before you raise the moral standard, ask your army units to return the trophy scalps of Pakistani soldiers. Oh, and don’t forget the trussed up bodies of Kashmiris, picked up, tortured and brutally killed. Remember Jaleel Andrabi and Major Avtar Singh?
Help build peace, not make war.
Since drumming sense into these TRP-captured warriors is unlikely, I suggest that they be put in a solid bunker fired upon by weapons held by an infantry company which merely consist of assault rifles, LMG/MGs, RR and an odd mortar round. The experience should have a salutary impact on their war morale, thank you! [NB: artillery/armour fire or aerial bombardment will be excessive for these brave souls.]
Finally, as I write these lines, Dr Tahirul Qadri is fulminating at Islamabad’s D-Chowk. The PPP and the PML-N say Qadri’s march has failed. Qadri says it has succeeded. The truth lies between these two extremes. Some of Qadri’s demands are right. The system needs reforms (as I said in a previous article). Others are excessive. In any case, he has made an impact. If he hadn’t started his campaign, he would have returned to politics with a whimper. His success: he has created a momentum. Now he needs to exploit it in the elections.
By the way, the politicians who are arguing that this is not democratic are bullshitting. Non-violent gatherings are perfectly democratic. In fact, they are called for when a ‘democratic’ government begins to ignore reforms, takes zero interest in public policy and continues to middle-finger those asking that it better begin governing.
Stop Press: The Supreme Court has ordered that Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf be arrested in the rental power case. This puts a different hue on Pakistani politics, Qadri’s movement and MQM’s support to that movement. If this is part of a broader plan to not just get rid of the PPP but also delay the elections, the country will plunge into another crisis.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 16th, 2013.
COMMENTS (27)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
This is so much better than readers comments... Good writing...
Till such time that the state is not separated from Religion nobody can save the country from destruction and imminent collapse!
Congratulations Ejaz for being honest and accepting the fact about the LOC incident. I wonder why no one else in pakistan has said it earlier? So it is clear from the writing that the firing was started by Pakistan in order to stop Indian army from building bunker on indian side of LOC.
This kind of issues don't need escalation and specially beheading of other army's soldiers. Also author justifies the killing of a soldier by slitting the throat claiming it to be a legitimate way of silencing someone, but he doesn't explain why there was a need to do it in peace time? Why pakistan army unit has to cross LOC and slit the throat? Are they thinking that this way they can stop building of bunker. Are you serious here?
If this is part of a broader plan to not just get rid of the PPP but also delay the elections, the country will plunge into another crisis.
Just remove the 'IF' from the beginning of the senrence and it becomes a statement of fact.
Nothing new, and waste of an Op Ed. These are five minutes of my life that are wasted forever.
@author When you write: "India provoked. Pakistan retaliated"...did you mean ...that Indians built bunkers on their side, and Pakistanis fired and killed them ? Your go to great lengths to appear precise, but give away by hiding the clarity.
Atleast our so called experts should re-read and check what they write! First, author argues that killing of Indian soldiers was a "revenge" attack. But Pakistan army has officialy denied that they have anything to do with that ambush. So who excatly is lying here? Second, think a bit more before throwing in "special forces" procedures. Silencing by slitting throat is possible only with static targets like sentries. Its nearly impossible with moving targets like petrol parties. Such illogical analogies might be great for 14 year olds, but they won't do your reputation any good. Such a job is possible only by a team 2 to 3 times the size of the target petrol party. Inital ambush would have killed/injured both the soldiers; superior fire power of attackers would have ensured that petrol party stayed in defensive mode, separated from those killed/injured; the head was severed and taken away as trophy when attackers found the dead soldier, who must have been the one closest to the attackers anyway. Indian army chief is right when he says that such an operation is not possible without planning. Third, talking about Indian atrocities in Kashmir in this context is childish. We are setting our own records in Balochistan and FATA.
Ejaz, You can say what you want, but this time Pakistan will not be able to hoodwink Indian politicians. Manmohan Singh has given an unequivocal message that after the brutality at LOC, it CANNOT be business as usual with Pakistan. In line with this, the visa liberalisation plan that was to go into effect today has been put on hold. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Manmohan-Singh-talks-tough-says-there-cannot-be-business-as-usual-with-Pakistan/articleshow/18034520.cms
The Indian Air Chief's speech also put Pakistani army leadership on notice that Indian top leadership IS noting the increased LOC violations and that India would explore other options to ensure compliance if the existing mechanism did not work. There were 57 cross-border violations by Pakistan in 2010, 60 in 2011 and 117 in 2012 . http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-01-12/news/362963301ceasefire-violations-lance-naiks-sudhakar-singh-territory-in-poonch-sector
Pakistan needs to realize that the nuclear umbrella does not give it a carte blanche for one provocation after another. IT should be kept in mind that Kargill too happened after 1998. While India never has and never will start a war, Pakistan's nuclear blackmail can only work upto a point.
@John B: Troll #1: Right on cue.
@Arifq: "Religion is a personal matter and it should be left at that."
Well said. The issue is not limited to Shia Sunni - which is the latest manifestation . The general notion that kafirs are worthy of killing started with decimating the Hindu and Sikh population in the country. Next there was interfering between man and God when COnstitution declared Ahmadis non-Muslim. And now the label is being extended to Shias.
IF the principle followed was that all lives are valuable - kafir or not and personal faith is between man and God then mullahs would not be in the business of certifying who is kaffir and who is not then these issues would not arise.
@gp65 .: Facts are immaterial, no one cares for it in PAK. When US sent counter terrorism experts, PAK was in an drunken frenzy that they were there to steal their nukes and OBL was watching the drama from Abbottabad.
& There are so many foolish citizen`s of this country posting comments appreciating sacking of the Prime minister, while there are many corrupt judge/Army Officers/Dictators who plunder the country. Not even one was held accountable for Osama Raid by US, Raymond Davis, land scams, anything else..
& Fools are celebrating...
"As for beheading, I personally find the practice unacceptable but before you raise the moral standard"
Ejaz... Atleast express some regret over the killing...
"If this is part of a broader plan to not just get rid of the PPP but also delay the elections, the country will plunge into another crisis."
Well, you too know all too well about the broader plan. No Judge was never dismissed by the Court. No Military Officer has ever been arrested, for imposition of Military Rule nor Corruption or Osama Raid or Shia Killing or Missing Persons.. Two Prime Ministers have been kicked out by the Judiciary... This says it all.
Mr Ejaz Haider needs to spend some days with Pakistani Taliban and then he can talk about 'be-headings'.
Accurate, unfortunately in the case of Pakistan's COIN strategy, analysis as always.
@gp65 .: "US had sent people to train Pakistani forces in counterinsurgency. Instead of keeping the trainers and monitoring their activitties better, in the wake of the Raymond Davis mess all the trainers were sent back. US said that if the trainers went, the equipment would also go and Gen. Kayani agreed to that. So in a sense this is a self inflicted wound." People have short memories and that serve the purpose!. You are right.
"More important is gathering intelligence, collating and analysing that data and then creating a picture. This part of the game requires a very high-level of investigative and analytical skills that the army doesn’t possess. It also requires equipment that, for the most part, we don’t have. "
US had sent people to train Pakistani forces in counterinsurgency. Instead of keeping the trainers and monitoring their activitties better, in the wake of the Raymond Davis mess all the trainers were sent back. US said that if the trainers went, the equipment would also go and Gen. Kayani agreed to that. So in a sense this is a self inflicted wound.
Also, the army cannot be pulled in to do something it is not trained to do at a time when it has other problems on its hands. Tell us one problem that this army has tackeld in last ten years?- If India is building bunkers Pakistan can also do so.Why interfering with India when country is plagued with too many internal problems by non state acters. Pakistan bigest problem is the constitution which gives every abc excuses to derail democracy. persecute minorities,isuuing chracter certificates etc.etc. How long surface analysis and not looking beneath the skin.India bashing politician bashing America bashing has served the purpose only for non state acters and public awam k'alanam.,always falling in trap of right wingers.Political stability.poverty,killings why?? because you (public) asked for it.
Also, the army cannot be pulled in to do something it is not trained to do at a time when it has other problems on its hands. Tell us one problem that this army has tackeld in last ten years?-
"By the way, the politicians who are arguing that this is not democratic are bullshitting. Non-violent gatherings are perfectly democratic. In fact, they are called for when a ‘democratic’ government begins to ignore reforms, takes zero interest in public policy and continues to middle-finger those asking that it better begin governing."
Absolutely right Aijaz Bhai. These so called democrats mocked the public mandate in every possible way in these last 5 years from Nawaz Sharif to Asif Zardari to the Chaudary's and ANP even MQM; well now they have seen their fate. The public is absolutely sick of this. They took shots at the army,establishment,ISI and judiciary to hide their incompetence. Now its time public makes a mockery of these democrats who dont want the system to derail. Just cant tell you how much fun some of us are having at this stage.......
Dear Author.
Thanks for a very nice article on current situation. Please dedicate one full coulmn for the sectarian violence in Pakistan. ( I know you hvae written on it before). The fact is that Deobandi Madrassas openly teach Shias being Apostate and this is not restricted to few of them. It is almost universal with some exceptions. I do not know how a state can get rid of the terrorism if its not willing to stop this " brain washing". Some body needs to talk to Debandi Ulema of India, who are original house keepers of the Deband School and ask them to help correct the ideology of their brethren in Pakistan. I feel that Deobandi sect in India is more moderate and tolerant than it is in Pakistan. Deobandi sect in Pakistan has been heavily influenced by Wahabi thought, bought from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The mild sufi touch that Deband Ulema like Ashraf Ali Thanvi or Imadullah Makki used to have is long gone in Pakistan. Then is the issue of funding of these extremist outfits by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait. I do not understand how can we stop this menace if money keeps flowing from SA or other Gulf Countries. Are we at any point going to talk to SA and Qatar eye to eye to stop their proxy wars with Iran in our country?
Well done Mr. Haider. You have put all three points in due context particularly first one the rise of extremist Deobandi groups and how to deal with them..!
Situation at LOC: at least you don't deny the beheading of a dead Indian soldier by Pakistani Army. This in civilized societies is considered barbaric and beyond the pale. Your allegations of the same behavior on India's part - two wrongs don't make it right. Furthermore, the values and their definitions between the two countries are at odds. We use the same terms but they mean entirely different things to each party. The definition of secular, tolerance, equality, honor, civility, peace for Pakistan are not the same as they are for the democratic societies of the world. Increasingly it is becoming clear to the world that primacy of religious supremacy dictates Pakistan's worldview. All means are justifiable as long as the supremacy of Islamism triumphs. Hence we can never have the peace that India and the civilized world imagines.
Well said Ejaz, Pakistan will not be able to climb out of this extremism mess unless there is a change of philosophy at the top, "state" has to severe its umbilical cord with religion i.e., all state laws and practices must be made secular. Religion is a personal matter and it should be left at that.
Thank you once again for your solid analysis on the situation Mr. Haider. I agree wholeheartedly with you when you say that CT efforts require a subtler and more sophisticated touch than can be expected of the army.
Yet the creation and deployment of this dream team of police officers/ anti-terrorism sleuths is not possible in the short term. Even if it was, the fact of the matter is that terrorists in Balochistan are hiding amongst the people. To get this local populace to help you out in this endeavour requires you to first gain their trust and confidence, which in turn requires increased governmental spending on basic utilities in the province, along with more favourable resource allocation, job creation etc. It also requires that you be able to protect these people from getting killed by the organisations they rat out. This requires the creation of a witness protection program, which in turn requires its own set of preconditions.
Counter-Terrorism requires a two-pronged approach that must be first envisioned, meticulously planned and carefully implemented. We must look beyond quick fixes and crack squads.
So, what is new in this opinion, and why should readers waste their brains?
Spot on about the LoC incident. Indian trolls converging in 3...2.....1