A Pentagon study commissioned by the US Air Force attempts to measure the mental impact of fighting a war from afar. The report reveals that up to 30 per cent of drone operators said they were “burned out and suffered from high levels of fatigue”. About 17 per cent of the drone pilots fell under the category of clinically distressed; a level which is considered by the US Air Force to affect the drone operator’s life at work and at home.
Various reasons are cited for drone pilots stressing out, most prominently stepping in and out of two dimensions. Such is the unusual video game-like nature of their work, which provides a detachment from the war zone before driving back home to a different reality. Sounds like a gamer’s dream but, according to the Air Force, this lifestyle produces its own set of psychological problems. If drone operators are having issues living in Las Vegas, imagine the trauma to those living under the daily threat of drone strikes or those having lost their families to ‘collateral damage’ and suicide attacks.
Being at war for over a decade coupled with returning home to a slumping economy has given rise to PTSD and suicides in the US forces. Perhaps the futility of attacking Iraq and Afghanistan weighs heavy on the conscience of soldiers. The increase in green on blue attacks surely doesn’t help, despite Leon Panetta terming them the Taliban’s ‘last gasp’. In comparison, the Pakistan armed forces, with their inferior weapons and technology, have lost 3,571 soldiers in battle. Concrete suicide figures for Pakistani forces were unobtainable but they are considered minimal in comparison to the number of lives lost to constant conflict.
Fighting a war on one’s own borders creates unique dilemmas when troops are expected to wage battle against fellow countrymen. The US government always has the option to extract its forces and return to a peaceful home. The Pakistani military cannot rest until there is a final resolution along the violent territory bordering Afghanistan. The Frontier Corps units are not deployed on rotations and will remain stationed indefinitely at the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Add to that the repercussions of a terrible Pakistani economy, daily terrorist attacks and an incompetent farce of a civilian government in power.
One difference in the conduct and bearing between the two militaries might be a result of the coalition forces not taking responsibility for a tactical reverse and instead searching for scapegoats. Perhaps the rank and file recognise the bogus justification for failures and the obvious lack of corrective measures which, in turn, has led to severe demoralisation.
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have left deep, ingrained scars on the minds of the US soldiers, wreaking havoc within their family units and causing them to take their own lives. Meanwhile, the civilian death toll of the ‘Global War on Terror’ continues to rise, with around 140,000 civilians dying violently in Afghanistan and Iraq over the last 11 years. Despite being at war for over a decade, the issue was not addressed during the US presidential election campaigns. It is only a matter of time before compromises are made with once sworn foes in order to secure a safe withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 2nd, 2013.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Malik... I agree with your point that the Iraq/Afghan campaigns are spawning more terror. Where I differ is your line about suicide bombers. There would be no market for attacks of this kind without individuals being under some sort of duress. If all was well then religious extremists would have a tough time finding people desperate enough to blow themselves up for empty promises of defiling virgins in the afterlife.
It's obvious that war leads to trauma. The definition of "war" has changed in the recent times (as it was the case through the human history) and future generations will adapt the reality of the modern definition of war with respect to their conscience and moral outlook. Some how this article comes across as being sadistically gleeful celebration of American soldiers' trauma.
@Atif: By bringing up these issues related to allied troops, a columnist indirectly presents an idea that the war is not just - soldiers are out there as a part of their job but they cannot deny the fact that they are fighting a war, which actually ignited the spread of more terror in the region instead of wiping it out. American politicians justify the war saying that there hasn't been any attack on US soil since the war started however they don't realize that the war has actually given birth to more terrorists and terrorism in the region, which would eventually move into the rest of the world. Besides the above mentioned fact, we must admit that fighting a guerrilla war is a huge stress factor for the troops of any country. We cannot avoid these issues when a conventional army engages with a non-conventional enemy. Taliban on the other hand actually consider this war a blessing of God because of their affiliation to their religious beliefs like jihad and martyrdom that’s why there are suicide attacks to kill the forces - but there is no individual suicide victim among the Talibans because of the stress related to war.
@Balach Khan Baloch: Agreed unanimously. But also comment on the article. Is it or not good? Nothing new - right?
This is very True ...
But Why does every columnist is concerned about mental and physical conditions of Allied troops ... More than The millions of innocent civilians...
Like in all such situations, the problem begs the answer: who killed the most number of civilians? What of the trauma of the suicide blast victims?
She is cute.
The tragedy of war extends far beyond the battlefield. Thanks for calling attention to this important issue!